Group Anagrams Using Hash Map in DSA C++ - Time & Space Complexity

Time Complexity: Group Anagrams Using Hash Map

O(n * k log k)

Understanding Time Complexity

We want to know how the time needed to group anagrams grows as we get more words.

How does the program's speed change when the list of words gets bigger?

Scenario Under Consideration

Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.

#include <vector>
#include <string>
#include <unordered_map>
#include <algorithm>

std::vector<std::vector<std::string>> groupAnagrams(std::vector<std::string>& strs) {
    std::unordered_map<std::string, std::vector<std::string>> map;
    for (auto &s : strs) {
        std::string key = s;
        std::sort(key.begin(), key.end());
        map[key].push_back(s);
    }
    std::vector<std::vector<std::string>> result;
    for (auto &pair : map) {
        result.push_back(pair.second);
    }
    return result;
}
    

This code groups words that are anagrams by sorting each word and using the sorted word as a key in a hash map.

Identify Repeating Operations

Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.

• Primary operation: Loop over all words and sort each word.
• How many times: Once for each word in the input list.

How Execution Grows With Input

As the number of words grows, the program sorts each word and inserts it into the map.

Input Size (n)	Approx. Operations
10	Sort 10 words, each of length k, plus 10 insertions
100	Sort 100 words, each of length k, plus 100 insertions
1000	Sort 1000 words, each of length k, plus 1000 insertions

Pattern observation: The time grows roughly in proportion to the number of words times the length of each word.

Final Time Complexity

Time Complexity: O(n * k log k)

This means the time grows with the number of words times the cost to sort each word.

Common Mistake

[X] Wrong: "Sorting each word is constant time, so overall time is just O(n)."

[OK] Correct: Sorting depends on word length, so it takes more time for longer words, affecting total time.

Interview Connect

Understanding how sorting inside loops affects time helps you explain and improve solutions confidently.

Self-Check

"What if we used character counts instead of sorting each word? How would the time complexity change?"

Practice

1. What is the main idea behind grouping anagrams using a hash map?

easy

A. Use sorted strings as keys to group words with the same characters

B. Use the length of the string as the key to group words

C. Use the first character of the string as the key

D. Use the last character of the string as the key

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand anagram grouping

   Anagrams have the same characters in different orders, so sorting the string gives a unique key for all anagrams.

2. Step 2: Use sorted string as hash map key

   By sorting each word and using it as a key, all anagrams map to the same key and can be grouped together.

3. Final Answer:

   Use sorted strings as keys to group words with the same characters -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Sorted string key = group anagrams [OK]

Hint: Sort each word to find its anagram group key [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using string length as key misses different anagrams
• Using first or last character groups unrelated words
• Not sorting strings before using as keys

2. Which of the following C++ code snippets correctly declares a hash map to group anagrams where the key is a string and the value is a vector of strings?

easy

A. std::unordered_map anagramGroups;

B. std::map> anagramGroups;

C. std::unordered_map> anagramGroups;

D. std::unordered_map anagramGroups;

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify key and value types

   The key should be a string (sorted word), and the value should be a vector of strings (group of anagrams).

2. Step 2: Match correct declaration

   std::unordered_map> anagramGroups; uses unordered_map with key as string and value as vector<string>, which is correct for grouping anagrams.

3. Final Answer:

   std::unordered_map> anagramGroups; -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Key=string, Value=vector<string> [OK]

Hint: Use unordered_map for grouping [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using int as key instead of string
• Using vector<char> as key (not hashable)
• Using string as value instead of vector<string>

3. What is the output of the following C++ code snippet?

std::vector words = {"eat", "tea", "tan", "ate", "nat", "bat"};
std::unordered_map> groups;
for (auto &word : words) {
    std::string sortedWord = word;
    std::sort(sortedWord.begin(), sortedWord.end());
    groups[sortedWord].push_back(word);
}
for (auto &pair : groups) {
    std::cout << "Group: ";
    for (auto &w : pair.second) std::cout << w << " ";
    std::cout << std::endl;
}

medium

A. Group: eat tea
Group: tan bat
Group: ate nat

B. Group: eat tea ate
Group: tan nat
Group: bat

C. Group: ate tea
Group: bat tan
Group: eat nat

D. Group: eat tan bat
Group: tea nat ate

Solution

1. Step 1: Sort each word and group by sorted key

   "eat", "tea", "ate" all sort to "aet" so grouped together; "tan", "nat" sort to "ant"; "bat" sorts to "abt".

2. Step 2: Print groups

   Groups printed are: "eat tea ate", "tan nat", and "bat".

3. Final Answer:

   Group: eat tea ate Group: tan nat Group: bat -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Sorted keys group anagrams correctly [OK]

Hint: Sort words, group by sorted key, print groups [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Not sorting words before grouping
• Mixing groups by original word order
• Printing keys instead of grouped words

4. Identify the error in the following code snippet that tries to group anagrams:

std::vector words = {"abc", "bca", "cab"};
std::unordered_map> groups;
for (auto word : words) {
    std::string key = word;
    std::sort(word.begin(), word.end());
    groups[key].push_back(word);
}

medium

A. Sorting is done on 'word' but 'key' is used as map key, causing wrong grouping

B. The vector 'words' is not initialized correctly

C. The map should use vector<char> as key instead of string

D. The loop variable should be a reference to avoid copying

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze sorting and key usage

   The code sorts 'word' but uses 'key' (unsorted) as the map key, so grouping is incorrect.

2. Step 2: Correct usage

   Sort 'key' and use it as the map key to group anagrams properly.

3. Final Answer:

   Sorting is done on 'word' but 'key' is used as map key, causing wrong grouping -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Sort key before using in map [OK]

Hint: Sort the key string, not the original word [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Sorting wrong variable before using as key
• Using unsorted string as map key
• Ignoring reference vs copy in loop

5. Given a list of strings, how would you modify the grouping anagrams approach to handle case-insensitive grouping (e.g., "Eat" and "tea" should be grouped together)?

hard

A. Sort strings without changing case

B. Use the original string as key without any changes

C. Group by string length only

D. Convert each string to lowercase before sorting and using as key

Solution

1. Step 1: Normalize case for consistent keys

   Convert each string to lowercase so that case differences do not affect grouping.

2. Step 2: Sort the lowercase string and use as key

   Sorting the lowercase string ensures all case variants of anagrams map to the same key.

3. Step 3: Group anagrams using normalized keys

   Use the lowercase sorted string as the hash map key to group anagrams case-insensitively.

4. Final Answer:

   Convert each string to lowercase before sorting and using as key -> Option D

5. Quick Check:

   Lowercase + sort = case-insensitive grouping [OK]

Hint: Lowercase strings before sorting to ignore case [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Not normalizing case before grouping
• Using original case strings as keys
• Grouping by length or unsorted strings