Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA C++programming~5 mins

Delete from Beginning of Doubly Linked List in DSA C++ - Time & Space Complexity

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Time Complexity: Delete from Beginning of Doubly Linked List
O(1)
Understanding Time Complexity

We want to understand how long it takes to remove the first item from a doubly linked list.

How does the time needed change as the list grows bigger?

Scenario Under Consideration

Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.


void deleteFromBeginning(Node*& head) {
    if (head == nullptr) return;
    Node* temp = head;
    head = head->next;
    if (head != nullptr) {
        head->prev = nullptr;
    }
    delete temp;
}
    

This code removes the first node from a doubly linked list and updates pointers accordingly.

Identify Repeating Operations

Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.

  • Primary operation: Single pointer update and node deletion.
  • How many times: Exactly once per call, no loops or recursion.
How Execution Grows With Input

Removing the first node always takes the same steps, no matter how big the list is.

Input Size (n)Approx. Operations
105 steps
1005 steps
10005 steps

Pattern observation: The number of steps stays the same as the list grows.

Final Time Complexity

Time Complexity: O(1)

This means deleting the first node takes a constant amount of time, no matter how large the list is.

Common Mistake

[X] Wrong: "Deleting the first node takes longer if the list is bigger because there are more nodes."

[OK] Correct: We only change a few pointers at the start, so the rest of the list size does not affect the time.

Interview Connect

Knowing that deleting from the start of a doubly linked list is quick helps you explain efficient list operations clearly in interviews.

Self-Check

"What if we changed this to delete from the end of the doubly linked list? How would the time complexity change?"

Practice

(1/5)
1. What happens to the head pointer when you delete the first node from a doubly linked list?
easy
A. It points to the last node
B. It becomes null immediately
C. It moves to the second node in the list
D. It remains pointing to the deleted node

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the head pointer role

    The head points to the first node in the doubly linked list.
  2. Step 2: After deletion, update the head pointer

    When the first node is deleted, the head must point to the next node, which becomes the new first node.
  3. Final Answer:

    It moves to the second node in the list -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Head points to new first node after deletion [OK]
Hint: Head always moves to next node after deleting first [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Not updating head pointer after deletion
  • Setting head to null without checking list size
  • Leaving head pointing to deleted node
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to delete the first node in a doubly linked list in C++?
easy
A. head = head->next; delete head->prev; head->prev = nullptr;
B. Node* temp = head; head = head->next; head->prev = nullptr; delete temp;
C. head->prev = nullptr; delete head; head = head->next;
D. delete head; head = head->next; head->prev = nullptr;

Solution

  1. Step 1: Store current head in temp

    We save the current first node in a temporary pointer to delete it safely after updating head.
  2. Step 2: Update head and fix previous pointer

    Set head to the next node, then set head->prev to nullptr to detach the old first node.
  3. Step 3: Delete the old first node

    Finally, delete the node stored in temp to free memory.
  4. Final Answer:

    Node* temp = head; head = head->next; head->prev = nullptr; delete temp; -> Option B
  5. Quick Check:

    Proper order: save, update, fix pointers, delete [OK]
Hint: Save head first, update pointers, then delete saved node [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Deleting head before updating pointers
  • Not setting head->prev to nullptr
  • Accessing head->prev when head is nullptr
3. What will be the output of the following code snippet after deleting the first node?
struct Node {
  int data;
  Node* prev;
  Node* next;
};

Node* head = new Node{1, nullptr, nullptr};
Node* second = new Node{2, head, nullptr};
head->next = second;

// Delete from beginning
Node* temp = head;
head = head->next;
head->prev = nullptr;
delete temp;

// Print list
Node* curr = head;
while(curr != nullptr) {
  std::cout << curr->data << " ";
  curr = curr->next;
}
medium
A. 1 2
B. No output (runtime error)
C. 1
D. 2

Solution

  1. Step 1: Initial list setup

    List has two nodes: 1 (head) -> 2. Head points to node with data 1.
  2. Step 2: Delete first node and update pointers

    Head moves to second node (data 2), and its prev is set to nullptr. The first node is deleted.
  3. Step 3: Print remaining list

    Only node with data 2 remains, so output is "2".
  4. Final Answer:

    2 -> Option D
  5. Quick Check:

    After deletion, list starts at 2 [OK]
Hint: After deleting head, print starts from new head [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Printing deleted node's data
  • Not updating head->prev to nullptr
  • Assuming both nodes print after deletion
4. Identify the error in the following code that deletes the first node of a doubly linked list:
void deleteBeginning(Node*& head) {
  if (head == nullptr) return;
  delete head;
  head = head->next;
  if (head != nullptr) head->prev = nullptr;
}
medium
A. Deleting head before updating head pointer causes undefined behavior
B. Missing check if head->next is nullptr
C. head->prev should be set to head->next
D. No error, code works fine

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze deletion order

    The code deletes head first, then tries to access head->next, which is invalid after deletion.
  2. Step 2: Correct order to avoid undefined behavior

    First save head->next in a temp pointer, update head, then delete old node.
  3. Final Answer:

    Deleting head before updating head pointer causes undefined behavior -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Accessing deleted memory causes error [OK]
Hint: Always update pointers before deleting nodes [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Deleting node before updating pointers
  • Accessing deleted node's members
  • Not checking for empty list
5. You have a doubly linked list with nodes: 10 <-> 20 <-> 30 <-> 40. After deleting the first node twice from the beginning, what will be the printed list?
hard
A. 30 <-> 40
B. 20 <-> 30 <-> 40
C. 10 <-> 20 <-> 30 <-> 40
D. 40

Solution

  1. Step 1: Initial list nodes

    List is 10 <-> 20 <-> 30 <-> 40, head points to 10.
  2. Step 2: First deletion

    Delete node 10, head moves to 20, set head->prev = nullptr. List now: 20 <-> 30 <-> 40.
  3. Step 3: Second deletion

    Delete node 20, head moves to 30, set head->prev = nullptr. List now: 30 <-> 40.
  4. Final Answer:

    30 <-> 40 -> Option A
  5. Quick Check:

    Two deletions remove first two nodes [OK]
Hint: Each deletion moves head to next node [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Deleting only once instead of twice
  • Not updating head->prev after second deletion
  • Printing old list without deletions
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard