What is the main goal of the Container With Most Water problem?
To find two lines in an array that together with the x-axis form a container, such that the container holds the maximum amount of water.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
In the Container With Most Water problem, what does the height array represent?
Each element in the height array represents the height of a vertical line drawn at that index on the x-axis.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Why do we use two pointers starting at the ends of the array in the Container With Most Water solution?
Because starting from the widest container and moving inward allows us to efficiently find the maximum area by adjusting pointers based on the shorter line.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
How do you calculate the area of water contained between two lines at indices i and j?
Area = (j - i) * min(height[i], height[j]) where (j - i) is the width and min(height[i], height[j]) is the height of the container.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is the time complexity of the optimal solution for the Container With Most Water problem?
O(n), where n is the number of lines, because each pointer moves at most n times.
Click to reveal answer
What does the two-pointer approach in the Container With Most Water problem start with?
APointers at random positions
BPointers at the middle of the array
CPointers at the beginning and end of the array
DPointers both at the start
✗ Incorrect
The two-pointer approach starts with one pointer at the beginning and one at the end to consider the widest container first.
When moving pointers inward, which pointer do we move to try to find a larger area?
AThe pointer at the taller line
BBoth pointers simultaneously
CThe pointer at the middle
DThe pointer at the shorter line
✗ Incorrect
We move the pointer at the shorter line because moving the taller line pointer cannot increase the area.
What does the width represent in the area calculation for Container With Most Water?
AThe distance between the two pointers (indices)
BThe difference between the heights of two lines
CThe minimum height of the two lines
DThe sum of the heights of the two lines
✗ Incorrect
Width is the horizontal distance between the two lines, calculated as the difference between their indices.
What is the main reason the brute force approach is inefficient for this problem?
AIt checks all pairs of lines leading to O(n^2) time
BIt does not calculate area correctly
CIt only checks adjacent lines
DIt uses extra memory
✗ Incorrect
The brute force approach checks every pair of lines, resulting in quadratic time complexity.
Which of these best describes the optimal solution's approach?
AGreedy with sorting
BTwo pointers moving inward
CDynamic programming
DRecursion with memoization
✗ Incorrect
The optimal solution uses two pointers starting at the ends and moves inward to find the maximum area efficiently.
Explain how the two-pointer technique helps find the maximum water container.
Think about how moving the shorter line pointer can help find a bigger container.
You got /5 concepts.
Describe how to calculate the area between two lines in the Container With Most Water problem.
Remember the container is limited by the shorter line.
You got /3 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main goal of the Container With Most Water problem?
easy
A. Find two lines that together with the x-axis form a container holding the most water
B. Sort the array of heights in ascending order
C. Find the maximum height in the array
D. Calculate the sum of all heights
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem statement
The problem asks to find two vertical lines which, together with the x-axis, form a container that holds the maximum amount of water.
Step 2: Identify what is being maximized
The area between two lines is calculated by the minimum height of the two lines multiplied by the distance between them. We want to maximize this area.
Final Answer:
Find two lines that together with the x-axis form a container holding the most water -> Option A
Quick Check:
Goal = Max water container [OK]
Hint: Max area = min height * width between lines [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking it's about sorting heights
Trying to sum heights instead of area
Looking for max single height only
2. Which of the following C++ code snippets correctly initializes two pointers for the two-pointer approach in the Container With Most Water problem?
easy
A. int left = 1, right = heights.size();
B. int left = 0, right = heights.size() - 1;
C. int left = 0, right = heights.size();
D. int left = 1, right = heights.size() - 1;
Solution
Step 1: Understand pointer initialization
We start with two pointers: one at the beginning (index 0) and one at the end (index size-1) of the array.
Step 2: Check each option
int left = 0, right = heights.size() - 1; correctly sets left = 0 and right = size - 1, which are valid indices. Other options use invalid indices or off-by-one errors.
Final Answer:
int left = 0, right = heights.size() - 1; -> Option B
Quick Check:
Pointers start at ends = int left = 0, right = heights.size() - 1; [OK]
Hint: Start pointers at array ends: 0 and size-1 [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using size() as index (out of bounds)
Starting pointers at 1 instead of 0
Swapping left and right initialization
3. What is the output of the following C++ code snippet?
std::vector<int> heights = {1, 8, 6, 2, 5, 4, 8, 3, 7};
int left = 0, right = heights.size() - 1;
int maxArea = 0;
while (left < right) {
int height = std::min(heights[left], heights[right]);
int width = right - left;
maxArea = std::max(maxArea, height * width);
if (heights[left] < heights[right]) {
left++;
} else {
right--;
}
}
std::cout << maxArea << std::endl;
medium
A. 56
B. 50
C. 48
D. 49
Solution
Step 1: Trace the two-pointer approach
Start with left=0 (height=1), right=8 (height=7), area= min(1,7)*8=8. Move left pointer since height[left]
Step 2: Continue updating maxArea
Next left=1 (8), right=8 (7), area= min(8,7)*7=49 (maxArea=49). Move right pointer since height[left]>height[right]. Then left=1, right=7 (3), area= min(8,3)*6=18 (maxArea=49). Move right pointer. Continue similarly until pointers meet. The maximum area found is 49.
Final Answer:
49 -> Option D
Quick Check:
Max area = 49 [OK]
Hint: Move pointer at smaller height to find max area [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not updating maxArea correctly
Moving wrong pointer after comparison
Calculating area with max height instead of min
4. Identify the bug in the following code snippet for the Container With Most Water problem:
int maxArea(std::vector<int>& heights) {
int left = 0, right = heights.size();
int max_area = 0;
while (left < right) {
int height = std::min(heights[left], heights[right]);
int width = right - left;
max_area = std::max(max_area, height * width);
if (heights[left] < heights[right]) {
left++;
} else {
right--;
}
}
return max_area;
}
medium
A. The loop condition should be left <= right
B. Use max instead of min to calculate height
C. right should be initialized to heights.size() - 1
D. Increment right instead of decrementing
Solution
Step 1: Check pointer initialization
right is initialized to heights.size(), which is out of bounds since valid indices go up to size()-1.
Step 2: Correct initialization and loop condition
right should be heights.size() - 1 to point to the last valid element. The loop condition left < right is correct.
Final Answer:
right should be initialized to heights.size() - 1 -> Option C
Quick Check:
Index out of bounds fixed by right should be initialized to heights.size() - 1 [OK]
Hint: Array indices go from 0 to size-1 [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using size() as index causing runtime error
Changing loop condition incorrectly
Using max instead of min for height
5. Given an array of heights representing vertical lines, how would you modify the two-pointer approach to find the maximum water container if the array can contain zero heights (lines with zero height)?
hard
A. Skip zero height lines by moving pointers inward until non-zero heights are found
B. Treat zero heights as normal and proceed with the standard two-pointer approach
C. Remove zero height lines from the array before processing
D. Use a nested loop to check all pairs instead of two-pointer
Solution
Step 1: Understand zero height impact
Lines with zero height cannot hold water, so including them wastes time and area calculations.
Step 2: Modify two-pointer approach
Skip zero height lines by moving pointers inward until both point to non-zero heights. Then apply the standard two-pointer logic to maximize area.
Final Answer:
Skip zero height lines by moving pointers inward until non-zero heights are found -> Option A
Quick Check:
Skip zeros for max area [OK]
Hint: Ignore zero heights by moving pointers inward [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Processing zero height lines as normal
Removing elements changes indices and complicates logic
Switching to nested loops loses efficiency
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.