2. Which of the following is the correct way to declare an array of 5 integers in C++?
easy
A. int arr(5);
B. int arr = new int[5];
C. int arr[5];
D. array<int> arr(5);
Solution
Step 1: Recall C++ array syntax
Static arrays in C++ are declared with type, name, and size in square brackets.
Step 2: Check each option
int arr[5]; uses correct syntax: int arr[5];. int arr = new int[5]; is incorrect syntax for static arrays. int arr(5); is invalid for arrays. array<int> arr(5); uses a non-standard syntax.
Final Answer:
int arr[5]; -> Option C
Quick Check:
Static array uses square brackets [OK]
Hint: Use square brackets for static array size in C++ [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using parentheses instead of square brackets
Confusing dynamic allocation syntax with static arrays
Using non-standard array declarations
3. What will be the output of the following C++ code?
int arr[3] = {10, 20, 30};
for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
std::cout << arr[i] << " ";
}
medium
A. 10 20 30
B. 30 20 10
C. 0 0 0
D. Compilation error
Solution
Step 1: Analyze array initialization
The array arr is initialized with values 10, 20, 30 at indices 0, 1, 2 respectively.
Step 2: Trace the loop output
The loop prints elements from index 0 to 2, so output is "10 20 30 " with spaces.
Final Answer:
10 20 30 -> Option A
Quick Check:
Loop from 0 to < size prints forward [OK]
Hint: Arrays print in stored order unless reversed [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Assuming reverse order print
Thinking uninitialized arrays print zeros
Expecting syntax errors from correct code
4. Identify the error in the following code snippet that uses an array:
int arr[3];
arr[3] = 100;
std::cout << arr[3];
medium
A. Missing semicolon after declaration
B. Array index out of bounds error
C. Syntax error in array declaration
D. No error, code runs fine
Solution
Step 1: Check array size and indexing
The array arr has size 3, so valid indices are 0, 1, 2.
Step 2: Identify invalid access
Accessing arr[3] is out of bounds and causes undefined behavior.
Final Answer:
Array index out of bounds error -> Option B
Quick Check:
Valid indices: 0 <= i < size [OK]
Hint: Array indices start at 0, max index = size-1 [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Assuming index 3 is valid for size 3 array
Ignoring runtime errors from invalid access
Confusing syntax errors with runtime errors
5. You need to store a fixed number of student grades and access them quickly by their position. Which data structure should you choose and why?
medium
A. Linked list, because it allows easy insertion and deletion
B. Binary tree, because it keeps data sorted automatically
C. Hash map, because it stores key-value pairs efficiently
D. Array, because it provides fast index-based access and fixed size
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem requirements
The number of grades is fixed and access by position (index) should be fast.
Step 2: Match data structure properties
Arrays have fixed size and provide constant time access by index, perfect for this need.
Step 3: Compare other options
Linked lists are slow for index access, hash maps are for key-value pairs, and binary trees are for sorted data.
Final Answer:
Array, because it provides fast index-based access and fixed size -> Option D
Quick Check:
Fast index access + fixed size: array [OK]
Hint: Fixed size + fast access = array choice [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Choosing linked list for fast index access
Confusing hash map use case with arrays
Selecting binary tree without sorting need
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.