Array Insertion at Beginning in DSA C++ - Time & Space Complexity

Time Complexity: Array Insertion at Beginning

O(n)

Understanding Time Complexity

We want to understand how long it takes to add a new item at the start of an array.

How does the time needed change as the array gets bigger?

Scenario Under Consideration

Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.

void insertAtBeginning(int arr[], int &size, int capacity, int value) {
    if (size == capacity) return; // no space
    for (int i = size - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
        arr[i + 1] = arr[i];
    }
    arr[0] = value;
    size++;
}
    

This code inserts a new value at the start of the array by shifting all existing elements one position to the right.

Identify Repeating Operations

Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.

• Primary operation: The for-loop that shifts elements to the right.
• How many times: It runs once for each existing element, so size times.

How Execution Grows With Input

As the array grows, the number of shifts grows the same way.

Input Size (n)	Approx. Operations
10	10 shifts
100	100 shifts
1000	1000 shifts

Pattern observation: The work grows directly with the number of elements; doubling the array size doubles the work.

Final Time Complexity

Time Complexity: O(n)

This means the time to insert at the beginning grows linearly with the array size.

Common Mistake

[X] Wrong: "Inserting at the beginning is always fast because it's just one step."

[OK] Correct: Actually, all existing elements must move one step right, so the time depends on how many elements are there.

Interview Connect

Knowing this helps you explain why arrays are not always best for front insertions and when linked lists might be better.

Self-Check

"What if we used a linked list instead of an array? How would the time complexity change?"

Practice

1. What happens when you insert an element at the beginning of an array in C++?

easy

A. All existing elements shift one position to the right to make space.

B. The new element replaces the first element without shifting others.

C. The array size decreases by one.

D. The array elements are sorted automatically.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand array structure

   An array stores elements in continuous memory locations.

2. Step 2: Effect of insertion at beginning

   To insert at the start, all elements must move right to free the first position.

3. Final Answer:

   All existing elements shift one position to the right to make space. -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Insertion at start shifts elements right = B [OK]

Hint: Insertion at start shifts elements right to free first slot [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking new element replaces first without shifting
• Assuming array size decreases
• Believing array sorts automatically

2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to insert an element `x` at the beginning of an array `arr` of size `n` in C++ (assuming enough space)?

easy

A. for(int i = 0; i < n; i++) arr[i+1] = arr[i]; arr[0] = x; n++;

B. arr[0] = x; for(int i = 1; i <= n; i++) arr[i] = arr[i-1]; n++;

C. for(int i = n; i > 0; i--) arr[i] = arr[i-1]; arr[0] = x; n++;

D. arr[n] = x; n++;

Solution

1. Step 1: Shift elements right from end

   Loop from last index `n` down to 1, moving each element to the right by one.

2. Step 2: Insert new element at index 0 and increase size

   Place `x` at `arr[0]` and increment `n`.

3. Final Answer:

   for(int i = n; i > 0; i--) arr[i] = arr[i-1]; arr[0] = x; n++; -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Shift right from end, insert at 0 = C [OK]

Hint: Shift from end to start, then insert at zero index [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Shifting from start to end overwrites data
• Not incrementing array size
• Inserting without shifting elements

3. What is the output of the following C++ code?

int arr[5] = {2, 4, 6, 8, 10};
int n = 5;
int x = 1;
for(int i = n; i > 0; i--) {
  arr[i] = arr[i-1];
}
arr[0] = x;
n++;
for(int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
  std::cout << arr[i] << " ";
}

medium

A. 2 4 6 8 10 1

B. 1 2 4 6 8 10

C. 1 2 4 6 8

D. 2 4 6 8 10

Solution

1. Step 1: Shift elements right to make space

   Elements move right: arr[5]=arr[4]=10, arr[4]=arr[3]=8, arr[3]=arr[2]=6, arr[2]=arr[1]=4, arr[1]=arr[0]=2.

2. Step 2: Insert 1 at arr[0] and print

   arr[0]=1, array becomes [1,2,4,6,8,10], printed with space.

3. Final Answer:

   1 2 4 6 8 10 -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Shift right + insert 1 at start = A [OK]

Hint: Shift right, insert new at zero, print all elements [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Not shifting elements correctly
• Printing old array size
• Inserting at wrong index

4. Identify the error in this code snippet that inserts `x` at the beginning of array `arr` of size `n`:

for(int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
  arr[i+1] = arr[i];
}
arr[0] = x;
n++;

medium

A. Loop shifts elements left instead of right, overwriting data.

B. Array size `n` is not incremented after insertion.

C. New element is inserted at wrong index.

D. Loop should start from `n` and go down to 1 to avoid overwrite.

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze loop direction

   Loop moves from 0 to n-1, shifting elements forward, overwriting original data.

2. Step 2: Correct loop direction

   Loop must run backward from n to 1 to shift elements safely without overwrite.

3. Final Answer:

   Loop should start from `n` and go down to 1 to avoid overwrite. -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Backward loop prevents overwrite = D [OK]

Hint: Shift elements backward from end to start to avoid overwrite [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Shifting elements forward overwrites data
• Forgetting to increment array size
• Inserting element at wrong position

5. Given an array `arr` of size `n` with elements sorted in ascending order, how can you insert a new element `x` at the beginning and keep the array sorted?

hard

A. If `x` is smaller than `arr[0]`, shift elements right and insert `x` at start; else find correct position.

B. Insert `x` at the beginning and then sort the entire array again.

C. Always insert `x` at the beginning without shifting elements.

D. Replace the last element with `x` if `x` is smaller than last element.

Solution

1. Step 1: Check if `x` is smaller than first element

   If yes, shift all elements right and insert `x` at index 0 to keep order.

2. Step 2: If `x` is not smallest, find correct position

   Find proper index to insert `x` to maintain sorted order, not necessarily at start.

3. Final Answer:

   If `x` is smaller than `arr[0]`, shift elements right and insert `x` at start; else find correct position. -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Insert at start only if smaller, else find position = A [OK]

Hint: Insert at start only if smaller; else find correct sorted position [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Always inserting at start breaks sorting
• Sorting entire array after insertion wastes time
• Replacing last element loses data