What happens to the elements after deleting an element at the middle index in an array?
All elements after the deleted index shift one position to the left to fill the gap.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Why can't we simply remove an element from the middle of a static array without shifting elements?
Because arrays have fixed size and continuous memory, removing an element leaves a gap that must be filled by shifting elements.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
In C++, what is the time complexity of deleting an element at the middle index of an array?
O(n), where n is the number of elements after the deleted index, due to shifting elements.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Show the array state after deleting the element at index 2 from [10, 20, 30, 40, 50].
After deletion and shifting: [10, 20, 40, 50]
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is the main difference between deleting an element in an array vs a linked list?
In arrays, elements after the deleted one must be shifted; in linked lists, pointers are adjusted without shifting elements.
Click to reveal answer
What must be done after deleting an element at the middle index in a static array?
AReplace it with zero and keep the rest unchanged
BShift all elements after it one position to the left
CShift all elements before it one position to the right
DNo action needed
✗ Incorrect
After deletion, elements after the removed index shift left to fill the gap.
What is the time complexity of deleting an element at the middle index in an array of size n?
AO(n^2)
BO(1)
CO(log n)
DO(n)
✗ Incorrect
Because elements after the deleted index must be shifted, the operation takes O(n) time.
If you delete the element at index 0 in array [5, 10, 15], what is the resulting array?
A[10, 15]
B[5, 10]
C[15, 10]
D[5, 15]
✗ Incorrect
Deleting index 0 removes 5, then elements shift left: [10, 15].
Which data structure allows deletion at middle index without shifting elements?
AArray
BStack
CLinked List
DStatic Array
✗ Incorrect
Linked lists adjust pointers to delete nodes without shifting elements.
What is the main disadvantage of deleting elements in an array compared to a linked list?
ARequires shifting elements after deletion
BCannot delete elements
CTakes constant time
DUses more memory
✗ Incorrect
Arrays require shifting elements after deletion, which can be costly.
Explain the steps to delete an element at the middle index of an array and how the array changes.
Think about how to fill the gap left by the deleted element.
You got /4 concepts.
Compare deleting an element at the middle index in an array versus a linked list.
Consider how elements are stored and accessed in both.
You got /4 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What happens when you delete the middle element from an array of size 5? int arr[5] = {10, 20, 30, 40, 50}; Delete the element at index 2 (middle). What is the new array?
easy
A. [20, 30, 40, 50]
B. [10, 20, 30, 40, 50]
C. [10, 20, 30, 50]
D. [10, 20, 40, 50]
Solution
Step 1: Identify the middle index and element
The array size is 5, so middle index is 2. The element at index 2 is 30.
Step 2: Delete the middle element and shift remaining elements
Remove 30, then shift elements after index 2 left by one: 40 moves to index 2, 50 moves to index 3.
Final Answer:
[10, 20, 40, 50] -> Option D
Quick Check:
Deleted middle element 30, shifted left [OK]
Hint: Remove middle, shift right elements left by one [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not shifting elements after deletion
Deleting wrong index
Leaving array size unchanged
2. Which of the following C++ code snippets correctly deletes the middle element from an array arr of size n?
easy
A. for(int i = n/2; i < n-1; i++) arr[i] = arr[i+1]; n--;
B. for(int i = 0; i < n/2; i++) arr[i] = arr[i+1]; n--;
C. arr[n/2] = 0; n--;
D. for(int i = n-1; i > n/2; i--) arr[i] = arr[i-1]; n--;
Solution
Step 1: Understand deletion logic
To delete middle element at index n/2, shift all elements after it one position left.
Step 2: Check each code snippet
for(int i = n/2; i < n-1; i++) arr[i] = arr[i+1]; n--; correctly shifts elements from middle to end left by one and reduces size. Others either shift wrong elements or just set zero without shifting.
Final Answer:
for(int i = n/2; i < n-1; i++) arr[i] = arr[i+1]; n--; -> Option A
Quick Check:
Shift elements after middle left [OK]
Hint: Shift elements from middle index to end left [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Shifting elements before middle index
Not reducing array size
Assigning zero instead of shifting
3. What is the output of the following C++ code?
int arr[6] = {5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30};
int n = 6;
int mid = n / 2;
for(int i = mid; i < n - 1; i++) {
arr[i] = arr[i + 1];
}
n--;
for(int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
std::cout << arr[i] << " ";
}
medium
A. 5 10 15 25 30
B. 5 10 15 20 25 30
C. 5 10 15 20 30
D. 5 10 20 25 30
Solution
Step 1: Calculate middle index and delete element
n=6, mid=3. Element at index 3 is 20. We delete 20 by shifting elements after index 3 left.
Step 2: Shift elements and print array
Shift arr[3]=arr[4]=25, arr[4]=arr[5]=30. New array: 5,10,15,25,30. Size reduced to 5.
Final Answer:
5 10 15 25 30 -> Option A
Quick Check:
Deleted 20, shifted left [OK]
Hint: Shift elements after middle left, reduce size by one [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not reducing array size
Printing old array size
Not shifting elements correctly
4. Find the error in this code that tries to delete the middle element from array arr of size n:
int mid = n / 2;
for(int i = mid; i <= n - 1; i++) {
arr[i] = arr[i + 1];
}
n--;
medium
A. Array size n should not be decremented
B. Middle index calculation is wrong
C. Loop condition should be i < n - 1, not i <= n - 1
D. Loop should start from 0, not mid
Solution
Step 1: Analyze loop range for shifting elements
The loop runs from mid to n-1 inclusive, so arr[i+1] accesses arr[n], which is out of bounds.
Step 2: Correct loop condition
Loop should run while i < n-1 to avoid accessing beyond array size.
Final Answer:
Loop condition should be i < n - 1, not i <= n - 1 -> Option C
Quick Check:
Prevent out-of-bounds by correct loop limit [OK]
Hint: Loop till one before last index to avoid overflow [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using <= instead of < in loop condition
Not decrementing array size
Wrong middle index calculation
5. Given an array arr of size n, write the logic to delete the middle element and return the new array size. What will be the size after deletion if n is even? Choose the correct approach.
hard
A. Delete element at index (n-1)/2, shift elements left, new size = n - 1
B. Delete element at index n/2, shift elements left, new size = n - 1
C. Delete element at index n/2, no shifting needed, new size = n - 1
D. Delete element at index n/2 - 1, shift elements left, new size = n - 1
Solution
Step 1: Understand middle index for even-sized array
In standard array operations, middle index is n/2 (integer division), consistent with odd sizes.
Step 2: Delete element at n/2 and shift elements left
Remove element at index n/2, shift all elements after it left by one, reduce size by 1.
Final Answer:
Delete element at index n/2, shift elements left, new size = n - 1 -> Option B
Quick Check:
Middle index = n/2 for even n [OK]
Hint: Use n/2 as middle index regardless of parity [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Deleting lower middle index (n/2 - 1) for even n
Not shifting elements after deletion
Not reducing array size
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.