Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA Cprogramming~5 mins

Check if Binary Tree is Balanced in DSA C - Cheat Sheet & Quick Revision

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Recall & Review
beginner
What does it mean for a binary tree to be balanced?
A binary tree is balanced if for every node, the height difference between its left and right subtrees is at most 1.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Why is checking the height difference important in a balanced binary tree?
Because a large height difference means one side is much deeper, which can cause inefficient operations like search, insert, or delete.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is the time complexity of a naive approach to check if a binary tree is balanced?
The naive approach has O(n²) time complexity because it calculates height for each node repeatedly.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
How does the optimized approach improve the check for balanced binary tree?
It calculates height and balance status in one traversal, returning -1 if unbalanced, achieving O(n) time complexity.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What does a height function return if the subtree is unbalanced in the optimized approach?
It returns -1 to indicate the subtree is unbalanced, so the check can stop early.
Click to reveal answer
What is the maximum allowed height difference between left and right subtrees for a node in a balanced binary tree?
A1
B2
C0
D3
Which approach has better time complexity for checking if a binary tree is balanced?
ANaive approach with repeated height calculations
BSorting nodes first
CUsing breadth-first search only
DOptimized approach with single traversal
In the optimized approach, what does a height return value of -1 indicate?
AHeight is zero
BSubtree is balanced
CSubtree is unbalanced
DNode is a leaf
What is the base case height of an empty subtree in the height calculation?
A-1
B0
C1
DUndefined
Which data structure is primarily used to represent a binary tree in C?
AArray
BLinked nodes with pointers
CStack
DQueue
Explain how to check if a binary tree is balanced using an optimized approach.
Think about combining height calculation and balance check in one function.
You got /5 concepts.
    Describe why the naive approach to check if a binary tree is balanced can be inefficient.
    Consider how many times you calculate height for the same nodes.
    You got /4 concepts.

      Practice

      (1/5)
      1. What does it mean for a binary tree to be balanced?
      easy
      A. The height difference between left and right subtrees of every node is at most 1
      B. All nodes have two children
      C. The tree has the same number of nodes on left and right
      D. The tree is a complete binary tree

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Understand balance condition

        A balanced binary tree means the height difference between left and right subtrees of every node is at most 1.
      2. Step 2: Compare other options

        Other options describe different tree properties but not the balance condition.
      3. Final Answer:

        The height difference between left and right subtrees of every node is at most 1 -> Option A
      4. Quick Check:

        Balance means height difference ≤ 1 [OK]
      Hint: Balance means height difference ≤ 1 at every node [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Confusing balanced with complete tree
      • Thinking balance means equal number of nodes
      • Assuming all nodes must have two children
      2. Which of the following C function signatures is correct to check if a binary tree is balanced?
      easy
      A. bool isBalanced(struct Node root);
      B. void isBalanced(struct Node root);
      C. int isBalanced(Node root);
      D. int isBalanced(struct Node* root);

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Check parameter type

        The function should take a pointer to the root node: struct Node* root.
      2. Step 2: Check return type

        Return type int is common for boolean checks in C (0 or 1).
      3. Final Answer:

        int isBalanced(struct Node* root); -> Option D
      4. Quick Check:

        Pointer parameter and int return type [OK]
      Hint: Use pointer to struct and int return for boolean in C [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Passing struct by value instead of pointer
      • Using void return type for boolean check
      • Missing struct keyword in parameter
      3. What will be the output of the following code snippet?
      struct Node {
        int data;
        struct Node* left;
        struct Node* right;
      };
      
      int height(struct Node* root) {
        if (!root) return 0;
        int leftHeight = height(root->left);
        int rightHeight = height(root->right);
        return (leftHeight > rightHeight ? leftHeight : rightHeight) + 1;
      }
      
      int isBalanced(struct Node* root) {
        if (!root) return 1;
        int leftHeight = height(root->left);
        int rightHeight = height(root->right);
        if (abs(leftHeight - rightHeight) > 1) return 0;
        return isBalanced(root->left) && isBalanced(root->right);
      }
      
      // Tree:
      //     1
      //    / \
      //   2   3
      //  /
      // 4
      
      int main() {
        struct Node n4 = {4, NULL, NULL};
        struct Node n2 = {2, &n4, NULL};
        struct Node n3 = {3, NULL, NULL};
        struct Node n1 = {1, &n2, &n3};
        printf("%d", isBalanced(&n1));
        return 0;
      }
      medium
      A. Undefined behavior
      B. 0
      C. 1
      D. Compilation error

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Calculate heights of subtrees

        Node 2's left subtree height is 1 (node 4), right subtree is 0, difference 1 ≤ 1. Node 1's left subtree height is 2, right subtree height is 1, difference 1 ≤ 1.
      2. Step 2: Check balance recursively

        All nodes satisfy balance condition, so isBalanced returns 1 (true).
      3. Final Answer:

        1 -> Option C
      4. Quick Check:

        Height difference ≤ 1 at all nodes means balanced [OK]
      Hint: Check height difference ≤ 1 at every node recursively [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Ignoring recursive balance check on subtrees
      • Miscomputing height values
      • Assuming difference > 0 means unbalanced
      4. Identify the bug in this code snippet that checks if a binary tree is balanced:
      int height(struct Node* root) {
        if (!root) return 0;
        int leftHeight = height(root->left);
        int rightHeight = height(root->right);
        return leftHeight + rightHeight + 1;
      }
      
      int isBalanced(struct Node* root) {
        if (!root) return 1;
        int leftHeight = height(root->left);
        int rightHeight = height(root->right);
        if (abs(leftHeight - rightHeight) > 1) return 0;
        return isBalanced(root->left) && isBalanced(root->right);
      }
      medium
      A. abs function is not included from math.h
      B. height function incorrectly sums left and right heights
      C. isBalanced does not check for NULL root
      D. isBalanced returns int instead of bool

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Analyze height function logic

        The height function incorrectly returns leftHeight + rightHeight + 1 instead of max(leftHeight, rightHeight) + 1.
      2. Step 2: Understand impact on balance check

        Incorrect height causes wrong height difference, leading to wrong balance result.
      3. Final Answer:

        height function incorrectly sums left and right heights -> Option B
      4. Quick Check:

        Height = max(left, right) + 1, not sum [OK]
      Hint: Height = max(left, right) + 1, not sum [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Summing heights instead of taking max
      • Ignoring NULL checks (though present here)
      • Confusing return types for boolean
      5. Given a binary tree where some nodes have only one child, which approach correctly checks if it is balanced? Choose the best method to implement isBalanced efficiently.
      hard
      A. Use a helper function that returns height and balance status simultaneously in one traversal
      B. Calculate height for each node repeatedly in isBalanced causing O(n²) time
      C. Check balance only at root node ignoring subtrees
      D. Count total nodes and compare left and right subtree counts

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Understand naive approach

        Calculating height separately for each node causes repeated work and O(n²) time complexity.
      2. Step 2: Efficient approach

        Using a helper function that returns both height and balance status in one traversal reduces time to O(n).
      3. Final Answer:

        Use a helper function that returns height and balance status simultaneously in one traversal -> Option A
      4. Quick Check:

        Single traversal with combined info is efficient [OK]
      Hint: Combine height and balance check in one traversal [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Recomputing heights multiple times
      • Ignoring subtree balance checks
      • Using node counts instead of heights
      Recommended

      Ready to prove it?

      Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

      10 questions~5 mineasy hard