Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA Cprogramming~10 mins

Remove Nth Node from End of List in DSA C - Execution Trace

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Concept Flow - Remove Nth Node from End of List
Create dummy node pointing to head
↓
Set two pointers: first and second at dummy
↓
Move first pointer n+1 steps ahead
↓
Move first and second pointers together until first reaches end
↓
Second pointer now points to node before target
↓
Remove target node by changing second->next
↓
Return dummy.next as new head
We use two pointers spaced n+1 apart to find the node before the one to remove, then adjust pointers to remove it.
Execution Sample
DSA C
struct ListNode* removeNthFromEnd(struct ListNode* head, int n) {
    struct ListNode dummy = {0, head};
    struct ListNode *first = &dummy, *second = &dummy;
    for (int i = 0; i <= n; i++) first = first->next;
    while (first != NULL) {
        first = first->next;
        second = second->next;
    }
    second->next = second->next->next;
    return dummy.next;
}
Removes the nth node from the end of a singly linked list using two pointers.
Execution Table
StepOperationNodes in ListPointer ChangesVisual State
1Create dummy node pointing to headdummy(0) -> 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> NULLdummy points to head (1), first = dummy, second = dummydummy(0) -> 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> NULL
2Move first pointer n+1=3 steps aheaddummy(0) -> 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> NULLfirst moves: dummy->1->2->3dummy(0) -> 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> NULL (first at 3, second at dummy)
3Move first and second pointers until first reaches NULLdummy(0) -> 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> NULLfirst: 3->4->5->NULL, second: dummy->1->2dummy(0) -> 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> NULL (first at NULL, second at 2)
4Remove node after second (node 3)dummy(0) -> 1 -> 2 -> 4 -> 5 -> NULLsecond->next changed from 3 to 4dummy(0) -> 1 -> 2 -> 4 -> 5 -> NULL
5Return dummy.next as new head1 -> 2 -> 4 -> 5 -> NULLhead updated to dummy.next (1)1 -> 2 -> 4 -> 5 -> NULL
6ExitList updated with nth node from end removedNo pointer changes1 -> 2 -> 4 -> 5 -> NULL
💡 first pointer reached NULL, removal done, list updated
Variable Tracker
VariableStartAfter Step 2After Step 3After Step 4Final
firstdummy(0)3NULLNULLNULL
seconddummy(0)dummy(0)222
dummy.next (head)11111
List Size55544
Key Moments - 3 Insights
Why do we move the first pointer n+1 steps ahead instead of n?
Moving first pointer n+1 steps ahead ensures second pointer stops at the node before the target node, allowing easy removal by changing second->next (see execution_table step 2 and 3).
What happens if the node to remove is the head node?
Using a dummy node before head handles this case smoothly. The second pointer will point to dummy, and removal adjusts dummy->next, effectively changing the head (see execution_table step 4 and 5).
Why do we return dummy.next instead of head?
Because the head might be removed, dummy.next always points to the updated list start, ensuring correct return (see execution_table step 5).
Visual Quiz - 3 Questions
Test your understanding
Look at the execution_table, what node is the first pointer at after moving n+1 steps in step 2?
ANode with value 2
BNode with value 3
CNode with value 4
DNULL
💡 Hint
Check execution_table row for step 2 under Pointer Changes and Visual State
At which step does the second pointer point to the node before the one to remove?
AStep 3
BStep 4
CStep 1
DStep 5
💡 Hint
Look at execution_table rows for step 3 and 4, see where second pointer is
If n was 1 (remove last node), how would the pointer movement change in step 2?
Afirst pointer moves 1 step ahead
Bfirst pointer moves 3 steps ahead
Cfirst pointer moves 2 steps ahead
Dfirst pointer does not move
💡 Hint
Recall first pointer moves n+1 steps ahead, see step 2 for n=2 example
Concept Snapshot
Remove Nth Node from End of List:
- Use dummy node before head
- Set two pointers at dummy
- Move first pointer n+1 steps ahead
- Move both pointers until first reaches end
- second points before target node
- Remove target by second->next = second->next->next
- Return dummy.next as new head
Full Transcript
This concept removes the nth node from the end of a singly linked list by using two pointers. First, a dummy node is created before the head to handle edge cases. Two pointers, first and second, start at the dummy. The first pointer moves n+1 steps ahead. Then both pointers move together until the first pointer reaches the end. At this point, the second pointer is just before the node to remove. The node is removed by changing second's next pointer to skip the target node. Finally, dummy.next is returned as the new head of the list. This method handles cases where the head node is removed and ensures safe pointer manipulation.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What does the problem "Remove Nth Node from End of List" ask you to do with a linked list?
easy
A. Remove the node that is Nth from the end of the list
B. Remove the node that is Nth from the start of the list
C. Add a new node at the Nth position from the end
D. Reverse the linked list up to the Nth node from the end

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the problem statement

    The problem requires removing the node that is exactly N positions from the end of the linked list.
  2. Step 2: Clarify the difference from other options

    Options A, C, and D describe different operations: removing from start, adding nodes, or reversing, which are not asked here.
  3. Final Answer:

    Remove the node that is Nth from the end of the list -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Remove Nth from end = Remove the node that is Nth from the end of the list [OK]
Hint: Focus on 'Nth from end' means counting backward [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing Nth from start with Nth from end
  • Thinking the problem asks to add nodes
  • Assuming the list needs reversing
2. Which of the following is the correct way to declare a pointer to the head of a singly linked list in C?
easy
A. struct Node head*;
B. Node head*;
C. struct Node* head;
D. Node* head;

Solution

  1. Step 1: Recall C struct pointer syntax

    In C, to declare a pointer to a struct Node, use 'struct Node* head;'.
  2. Step 2: Identify incorrect syntax

    Options A, B, and D misuse the order or omit 'struct' keyword which is required unless typedef is used.
  3. Final Answer:

    struct Node* head; -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Pointer to struct Node = struct Node* head; [OK]
Hint: Remember 'struct' keyword before struct name in C [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Omitting 'struct' keyword in declaration
  • Placing '*' incorrectly after variable name
  • Using typedef name without defining it
3. What will be the output linked list after removing the 2nd node from the end in the list: 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> null?
medium
A. 1 -> 2 -> 4 -> 5 -> null
B. 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> null
C. 1 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> null
D. 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 5 -> null

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify the 2nd node from the end

    The list is 1->2->3->4->5. Counting from end: 5 (1st), 4 (2nd). So node with value 4 is to be removed.
  2. Step 2: Remove node with value 4 and link previous to next

    After removal, the list becomes 1->2->3->5->null.
  3. Final Answer:

    1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 5 -> null -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Remove 2nd from end (4) = 1->2->3->5->null [OK]
Hint: Count nodes from end to find which to remove [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Removing the wrong node counting from start
  • Skipping the link update after removal
  • Confusing 2nd from end with 2nd from start
4. Given the following code snippet to remove the Nth node from end, what is the error?
struct Node* removeNthFromEnd(struct Node* head, int n) {
    struct Node* fast = head;
    struct Node* slow = head;
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
        fast = fast->next;
    }
    while (fast->next != NULL) {
        fast = fast->next;
        slow = slow->next;
    }
    slow->next = slow->next->next;
    return head;
}
medium
A. The slow pointer is moved too many times causing segmentation fault
B. The loop does not check if fast becomes NULL before accessing fast->next
C. The function does not handle the case when n is zero
D. The function returns the wrong pointer instead of head

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze the for loop moving fast pointer

    The loop moves fast pointer n times without checking if fast is NULL, which can cause a crash if n is larger than list length.
  2. Step 2: Check while loop condition and pointer usage

    The while loop uses fast->next without null check before the loop, which is unsafe if fast is NULL.
  3. Final Answer:

    The loop does not check if fast becomes NULL before accessing fast->next -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Missing NULL check on fast pointer causes error [OK]
Hint: Always check pointers for NULL before dereferencing [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Not checking if fast is NULL before fast->next
  • Assuming list length is always >= n
  • Ignoring edge case when removing head node
5. You have a linked list: 10 -> 20 -> 30 -> 40 -> 50 -> null. You want to remove the 5th node from the end. What will be the resulting list?
hard
A. 20 -> 30 -> 40 -> 50 -> null
B. 10 -> 20 -> 30 -> 40 -> null
C. 10 -> 20 -> 30 -> 40 -> 50 -> null (no change)
D. 30 -> 40 -> 50 -> null

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify the 5th node from the end

    The list length is 5, so the 5th node from the end is the first node with value 10.
  2. Step 2: Remove the head node and update head pointer

    Removing the first node results in the list: 20 -> 30 -> 40 -> 50 -> null.
  3. Final Answer:

    20 -> 30 -> 40 -> 50 -> null -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Remove 5th from end (head) = list without first node [OK]
Hint: Removing N equals list length means remove head [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Not updating head pointer when removing first node
  • Confusing Nth from end with Nth from start
  • Assuming no change if N equals list length
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard