What is the main idea behind removing the Nth node from the end of a linked list?
Use two pointers spaced N nodes apart. Move both until the second pointer reaches the end. The first pointer will then be just before the node to remove.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Why do we use a dummy node at the start of the linked list in this problem?
A dummy node helps handle edge cases, like removing the first node, by providing a fixed node before the head.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
In the two-pointer approach, what happens if the fast pointer moves N steps and reaches NULL immediately?
It means we need to remove the head node because the list length equals N.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What is the time complexity of removing the Nth node from the end of a singly linked list using the two-pointer method?
O(L), where L is the length of the list, because we traverse the list at most twice.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
How do you update the pointers to remove the target node once the first pointer is just before it?
Set first->next = first->next->next to skip the target node and free its memory if needed.
Click to reveal answer
What does the fast pointer do initially in the two-pointer approach?
AMoves N steps ahead
BMoves one step
CStays at the head
DMoves to the end immediately
✗ Incorrect
The fast pointer moves N steps ahead to create a gap of N nodes between fast and slow pointers.
Why is a dummy node useful when removing the Nth node from the end?
AIt stores the value of the removed node
BIt prevents memory leaks
CIt helps handle removal of the head node easily
DIt speeds up the traversal
✗ Incorrect
A dummy node simplifies edge cases like removing the head by providing a stable node before the head.
If the list has 5 nodes and N=5, which node is removed?
AFirst node
BLast node
CThird node
DSecond node
✗ Incorrect
Removing the 5th node from the end means removing the first node in a 5-node list.
What is the space complexity of the two-pointer method for this problem?
AO(N^2)
BO(N)
CO(log N)
DO(1)
✗ Incorrect
The method uses only a few pointers, so space complexity is constant O(1).
After positioning the pointers, how do you remove the target node?
ASet target->next = NULL
BSet previous->next = target->next
CDelete the entire list
DSwap values with next node
✗ Incorrect
You skip the target node by linking the previous node directly to the node after the target.
Explain step-by-step how to remove the Nth node from the end of a singly linked list using two pointers.
Think about how spacing the pointers helps find the node to remove.
You got /5 concepts.
Describe how edge cases like removing the head node are handled in the Remove Nth Node from End of List problem.
Consider what happens when N equals the list length.
You got /3 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the problem "Remove Nth Node from End of List" ask you to do with a linked list?
easy
A. Remove the node that is Nth from the end of the list
B. Remove the node that is Nth from the start of the list
C. Add a new node at the Nth position from the end
D. Reverse the linked list up to the Nth node from the end
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem statement
The problem requires removing the node that is exactly N positions from the end of the linked list.
Step 2: Clarify the difference from other options
Options A, C, and D describe different operations: removing from start, adding nodes, or reversing, which are not asked here.
Final Answer:
Remove the node that is Nth from the end of the list -> Option A
Quick Check:
Remove Nth from end = Remove the node that is Nth from the end of the list [OK]
Hint: Focus on 'Nth from end' means counting backward [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing Nth from start with Nth from end
Thinking the problem asks to add nodes
Assuming the list needs reversing
2. Which of the following is the correct way to declare a pointer to the head of a singly linked list in C?
easy
A. struct Node head*;
B. Node head*;
C. struct Node* head;
D. Node* head;
Solution
Step 1: Recall C struct pointer syntax
In C, to declare a pointer to a struct Node, use 'struct Node* head;'.
Step 2: Identify incorrect syntax
Options A, B, and D misuse the order or omit 'struct' keyword which is required unless typedef is used.
Final Answer:
struct Node* head; -> Option C
Quick Check:
Pointer to struct Node = struct Node* head; [OK]
Hint: Remember 'struct' keyword before struct name in C [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Omitting 'struct' keyword in declaration
Placing '*' incorrectly after variable name
Using typedef name without defining it
3. What will be the output linked list after removing the 2nd node from the end in the list: 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> null?
medium
A. 1 -> 2 -> 4 -> 5 -> null
B. 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> null
C. 1 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> null
D. 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 5 -> null
Solution
Step 1: Identify the 2nd node from the end
The list is 1->2->3->4->5. Counting from end: 5 (1st), 4 (2nd). So node with value 4 is to be removed.
Step 2: Remove node with value 4 and link previous to next
After removal, the list becomes 1->2->3->5->null.
Final Answer:
1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 5 -> null -> Option D
Quick Check:
Remove 2nd from end (4) = 1->2->3->5->null [OK]
Hint: Count nodes from end to find which to remove [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Removing the wrong node counting from start
Skipping the link update after removal
Confusing 2nd from end with 2nd from start
4. Given the following code snippet to remove the Nth node from end, what is the error?
struct Node* removeNthFromEnd(struct Node* head, int n) {
struct Node* fast = head;
struct Node* slow = head;
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
fast = fast->next;
}
while (fast->next != NULL) {
fast = fast->next;
slow = slow->next;
}
slow->next = slow->next->next;
return head;
}
medium
A. The slow pointer is moved too many times causing segmentation fault
B. The loop does not check if fast becomes NULL before accessing fast->next
C. The function does not handle the case when n is zero
D. The function returns the wrong pointer instead of head
Solution
Step 1: Analyze the for loop moving fast pointer
The loop moves fast pointer n times without checking if fast is NULL, which can cause a crash if n is larger than list length.
Step 2: Check while loop condition and pointer usage
The while loop uses fast->next without null check before the loop, which is unsafe if fast is NULL.
Final Answer:
The loop does not check if fast becomes NULL before accessing fast->next -> Option B
Quick Check:
Missing NULL check on fast pointer causes error [OK]
Hint: Always check pointers for NULL before dereferencing [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not checking if fast is NULL before fast->next
Assuming list length is always >= n
Ignoring edge case when removing head node
5. You have a linked list: 10 -> 20 -> 30 -> 40 -> 50 -> null. You want to remove the 5th node from the end. What will be the resulting list?
hard
A. 20 -> 30 -> 40 -> 50 -> null
B. 10 -> 20 -> 30 -> 40 -> null
C. 10 -> 20 -> 30 -> 40 -> 50 -> null (no change)
D. 30 -> 40 -> 50 -> null
Solution
Step 1: Identify the 5th node from the end
The list length is 5, so the 5th node from the end is the first node with value 10.
Step 2: Remove the head node and update head pointer
Removing the first node results in the list: 20 -> 30 -> 40 -> 50 -> null.
Final Answer:
20 -> 30 -> 40 -> 50 -> null -> Option A
Quick Check:
Remove 5th from end (head) = list without first node [OK]
Hint: Removing N equals list length means remove head [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not updating head pointer when removing first node
Confusing Nth from end with Nth from start
Assuming no change if N equals list length
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.