Why sources define raw data contracts in dbt - Performance Analysis

Time Complexity: Why sources define raw data contracts

O(n)

Understanding Time Complexity

We want to understand how defining raw data contracts in sources affects the time it takes to process data in dbt.

Specifically, how does checking these contracts scale as data grows?

Scenario Under Consideration

Analyze the time complexity of this dbt source definition with raw data contracts.

  sources:
    - name: raw_data
      tables:
        - name: users
          columns:
            - name: id
              tests:
                - not_null
                - unique
            - name: email
              tests:
                - not_null
                - unique

This code defines a source with raw data contracts that check if columns are not null and unique.

Identify Repeating Operations

Look at what repeats when dbt runs these tests.

• Primary operation: Scanning each row in the source table to check constraints.
• How many times: Once per test per column, over all rows.

How Execution Grows With Input

As the number of rows grows, the checks take longer because each row is examined.

Input Size (n)	Approx. Operations
10	~40 (2 tests x 2 columns x 10 rows)
100	~400 (2 tests x 2 columns x 100 rows)
1000	~4000 (2 tests x 2 columns x 1000 rows)

Pattern observation: Operations grow roughly in direct proportion to the number of rows.

Final Time Complexity

Time Complexity: O(n)

This means the time to check raw data contracts grows linearly with the number of rows in the source.

Common Mistake

[X] Wrong: "Adding more columns with tests does not affect time much because tests run independently."

[OK] Correct: Each test on each column scans all rows, so more columns or tests multiply the work.

Interview Connect

Understanding how data validation scales helps you design efficient data pipelines and write better dbt models.

Self-Check

What if we added a test that compares values between two columns? How would the time complexity change?

Practice

1. Why do we define raw data contracts in dbt sources?

easy

A. To set clear expectations for the raw data coming into the system

B. To speed up the data loading process

C. To automatically fix data errors

D. To create visual reports from raw data

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the purpose of raw data contracts

   Raw data contracts define what the incoming data should look like, such as expected columns and types.

2. Step 2: Identify the main benefit in dbt context

   They help teams know what to expect and catch issues early, not speed up loading or fix errors automatically.

3. Final Answer:

   To set clear expectations for the raw data coming into the system -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Raw data contracts = clear data expectations [OK]

Hint: Raw data contracts = clear data rules for sources [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking contracts speed up data loading
• Assuming contracts fix data automatically
• Confusing contracts with reporting tools

2. Which of the following is the correct way to define a source in a dbt YAML file for raw data contracts?

easy

A. source:
name: raw_data
table: users
columns:
- id
tests: [not_null, unique]

B. sources:
- name: raw_data
tables:
- name: users
columns:
- name: id
tests: [not_null, unique]

C. sources:
raw_data:
users:
columns:
- id
tests: [not_null, unique]

D. source:
- raw_data
- users
- columns:
- id
tests: [not_null, unique]

Solution

1. Step 1: Recall dbt source YAML structure

   Sources are defined under sources: as a list with name and tables keys.

2. Step 2: Match correct indentation and keys

   sources: - name: raw_data tables: - name: users columns: - name: id tests: [not_null, unique] correctly uses sources list, name, tables, and columns with tests.

3. Final Answer:

   sources: - name: raw_data tables: - name: users columns: - name: id tests: [not_null, unique] -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   dbt source YAML = list with name, tables, columns [OK]

Hint: Sources use list with name and tables keys in YAML [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using singular 'source' instead of 'sources'
• Incorrect indentation or missing keys
• Listing columns without proper nesting

3. Given this source definition in dbt YAML:

sources:
  - name: raw_sales
    tables:
      - name: transactions
        columns:
          - name: transaction_id
            tests: [not_null, unique]
          - name: amount
            tests: [not_null]

What happens if a transaction has a null amount when running dbt tests?

medium

A. The test will pass because nulls are allowed by default

B. The test will be skipped for the 'amount' column

C. dbt will automatically fill null amounts with zero

D. The test will fail, alerting that a null value exists in 'amount'

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the 'not_null' test in dbt

   The 'not_null' test checks that no null values exist in the specified column.

2. Step 2: Predict test behavior on null data

   If a null value exists in 'amount', the 'not_null' test will fail and alert the user.

3. Final Answer:

   The test will fail, alerting that a null value exists in 'amount' -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   'not_null' test fails on nulls [OK]

Hint: 'not_null' test fails if any nulls found [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking dbt fills nulls automatically
• Assuming tests pass by default
• Believing tests skip columns with nulls

4. You wrote this source YAML in dbt:

sources:
  - name: raw_data
    tables:
      - name: customers
        columns:
          - name: customer_id
            tests: not_null, unique

When running dbt, you get a syntax error. What is the problem?

medium

A. The tests list should be inside square brackets [ ]

B. The 'columns' key should be 'column'

C. The 'tables' key should be a dictionary, not a list

D. The source name cannot be 'raw_data'

Solution

1. Step 1: Check YAML syntax for tests

   Tests must be listed as a YAML list inside square brackets or as a list with dashes.

2. Step 2: Identify the error in tests format

   Writing tests: not_null, unique is invalid YAML; it should be tests: [not_null, unique].

3. Final Answer:

   The tests list should be inside square brackets [ ] -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Tests need brackets or dashes in YAML [OK]

Hint: Tests must be a list with brackets or dashes [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Writing tests as comma-separated string without brackets
• Using wrong key names like 'column' instead of 'columns'
• Misunderstanding list vs dictionary in YAML

5. You want to ensure your raw data source in dbt matches a strict contract: every 'order_id' must be unique and not null, and 'order_date' must be present and in date format. How should you define this in your source YAML to catch issues early?

hard

A. Define the source with columns and add tests only for 'order_id' as unique, ignoring 'order_date'

B. Define the source with columns but no tests; rely on downstream models to catch errors

C. Define the source with columns 'order_id' and 'order_date' and add tests: 'order_id' with [not_null, unique], 'order_date' with [not_null, accepted_values] for dates

D. Define the source with columns and add tests for 'order_date' only, ignoring 'order_id'

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify required tests for 'order_id'

   To ensure uniqueness and no nulls, use tests [not_null, unique] on 'order_id'.

2. Step 2: Define tests for 'order_date'

   To ensure presence and valid dates, use [not_null] and a test like 'accepted_values' or a custom test for date format.

3. Step 3: Combine tests in source YAML

   Include both columns with their respective tests to catch issues early at the source level.

4. Final Answer:

   Define the source with columns 'order_id' and 'order_date' and add tests: 'order_id' with [not_null, unique], 'order_date' with [not_null, accepted_values] for dates -> Option C

5. Quick Check:

   Raw data contracts include all critical tests [OK]

Hint: Test all critical columns with not_null and uniqueness [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Skipping tests on important columns
• Relying on downstream models for raw data validation
• Not testing data formats like dates