Bird
Raised Fist0
CSSmarkup~10 mins

First-child and last-child in CSS - Interactive Code Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available

Start learning this pattern below

Jump into concepts and practice - no test required

or
Recommended
Test this pattern10 questions across easy, medium, and hard to know if this pattern is strong
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to select the first child element of a list.

CSS
ul li:[1] { color: red; }
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Afirst-child
Bonly-child
Cnth-child(2)
Dlast-child
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using :last-child instead of :first-child
Using :nth-child(2) which selects the second child
Using :only-child which selects an element that is the only child
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to select the last paragraph inside a section.

CSS
section p:[1] { font-weight: bold; }
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Alast-child
Bfirst-child
Cnth-last-child(2)
Donly-child
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using :first-child instead of :last-child
Using :nth-last-child(2) which selects the second last child
Using :only-child which selects an element that is the only child
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the code to select the first list item correctly.

CSS
ol li:[1] { background-color: yellow; }
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Alast-child
Bnth-child(0)
Cfirst-child
Dnth-child(1)
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using :last-child which selects the last item
Using :nth-child(0) which is invalid
Using :nth-child(1) which works but is less clear
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to style the first and last list items with different colors.

CSS
ul li:[1] { color: green; }
ul li:[2] { color: blue; }
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Afirst-child
Bnth-child(2)
Clast-child
Donly-child
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using :nth-child(2) instead of :last-child for the last item
Using :only-child which only works if there is one item
Mixing up first-child and last-child
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to style the first list item italic, the last list item bold, and all list items except the second one gray.

CSS
li:[1] { font-style: italic; }
li:[2] { font-weight: bold; }
li:not(:[3]) { color: gray; }
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Afirst-child
Blast-child
Conly-child
Dnth-child(2)
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using :only-child incorrectly when there are multiple items
Confusing :nth-child(2) with :last-child
Not using :not() correctly in the third selector

Practice

(1/5)
1. What does the CSS selector :first-child do?
easy
A. It selects the last child element inside its parent.
B. It selects the first child element inside its parent.
C. It selects all child elements except the first.
D. It selects only the parent element.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the selector purpose

    The :first-child selector targets only the very first child element within a parent container.
  2. Step 2: Compare with other options

    :last-child targets the last child, others do not match the description.
  3. Final Answer:

    It selects the first child element inside its parent. -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    :first-child = first child selected [OK]
Hint: First-child always picks the very first element inside a parent [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing :first-child with :last-child
  • Thinking it selects all children
  • Assuming it selects the parent
2. Which of the following is the correct CSS syntax to style the last child of a <ul> list?
easy
A. ul > li:last-child { color: red; }
B. ul:last-child { color: red; }
C. ul li:first-child { color: red; }
D. ul:last-child li { color: red; }

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify the target element

    The goal is to style the last <li> inside a <ul>, so the selector must target li elements that are last children.
  2. Step 2: Check selector correctness

    ul > li:last-child correctly selects the last li directly inside ul. Other options either select the wrong element or use incorrect syntax.
  3. Final Answer:

    ul > li:last-child { color: red; } -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Correct syntax for last child inside ul = ul > li:last-child { color: red; } [OK]
Hint: Use parent > child:last-child to style last child only [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using :last-child on the parent instead of the child
  • Confusing :first-child with :last-child
  • Missing the direct child combinator >
3. Given this HTML:
<ul>
  <li>Apple</li>
  <li>Banana</li>
  <li>Cherry</li>
</ul>

And CSS:
li:first-child { color: blue; }
li:last-child { color: green; }

What color will the text "Banana" have when rendered?
medium
A. Blue
B. Green
C. Black (default)
D. Both blue and green

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify which elements get styled

    li:first-child styles the first li (Apple), li:last-child styles the last li (Cherry).
  2. Step 2: Determine Banana's position

    Banana is the second li, so it is neither first nor last child, so no color styles apply.
  3. Final Answer:

    Black (default) -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Banana is middle child, no color applied [OK]
Hint: Only first or last child get styles, middle ones stay default [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming all list items get styled
  • Confusing order of children
  • Thinking styles cascade to siblings
4. This CSS code is intended to color the first and last paragraphs inside a <section> green and blue respectively:
section p:first-child { color: green; }
section p:last-child { color: blue; }

But only the first paragraph turns green, the last paragraph stays black. Why?
medium
A. Because the colors green and blue are invalid.
B. Because the CSS syntax is incorrect.
C. Because section cannot contain paragraphs.
D. Because p elements are not the first or last child of section.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand :first-child and :last-child context

    These selectors check if the element is the very first or last child of its parent, regardless of type.
  2. Step 2: Check if p is first or last child

    If other elements (like headings or divs) come before or after the p, then p is not first or last child, so styles won't apply.
  3. Final Answer:

    Because p elements are not the first or last child of section. -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    :first-child and :last-child depend on element position, not type [OK]
Hint: Check if element is truly first/last child, not just first/last of type [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming :first-child means first of type
  • Ignoring other sibling elements
  • Thinking syntax is wrong when it's position issue
5. You want to style the first and last <li> elements inside every <ul> differently, but only if the <li> is also the first or last child of its parent. Which CSS selectors correctly achieve this?
hard
A. ul > li:first-child { font-weight: bold; } and ul > li:last-child { font-style: italic; }
B. ul:first-child li { font-weight: bold; } and ul:last-child li { font-style: italic; }
C. ul li:first-child { font-weight: bold; } and ul li:last-child { font-style: italic; }
D. ul li:first-of-type { font-weight: bold; } and ul li:last-of-type { font-style: italic; }

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the requirement

    We want to style only li elements that are the first or last child of their ul parent.
  2. Step 2: Choose selectors that target direct children and correct position

    ul > li:first-child and ul > li:last-child select li elements that are direct children and first or last child respectively. This matches the requirement exactly.
  3. Step 3: Evaluate other options

    ul li:first-child { font-weight: bold; } and ul li:last-child { font-style: italic; } misses the direct child combinator, which can cause incorrect matches if nested lists exist. ul:first-child li { font-weight: bold; } and ul:last-child li { font-style: italic; } incorrectly applies :first-child to ul. ul li:first-of-type { font-weight: bold; } and ul li:last-of-type { font-style: italic; } uses :first-of-type which selects first li regardless of position among siblings.
  4. Final Answer:

    ul > li:first-child { font-weight: bold; } and ul > li:last-child { font-style: italic; } -> Option A
  5. Quick Check:

    Direct child + :first-child and :last-child = ul > li:first-child { font-weight: bold; } and ul > li:last-child { font-style: italic; } [OK]
Hint: Use direct child combinator > with :first-child and :last-child [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Omitting > combinator causing wrong matches
  • Confusing :first-child with :first-of-type
  • Applying selectors to wrong parent element