Bird
Raised Fist0
CSSmarkup~5 mins

First-child and last-child in CSS - Cheat Sheet & Quick Revision

Choose your learning style10 modes available

Start learning this pattern below

Jump into concepts and practice - no test required

or
Recommended
Test this pattern10 questions across easy, medium, and hard to know if this pattern is strong
Recall & Review
beginner
What does the CSS selector :first-child do?
It selects the very first child element inside its parent element.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What does the CSS selector :last-child do?
It selects the very last child element inside its parent element.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Can :first-child select the first element of a specific type only?
No, :first-child selects the first child regardless of its type. To select the first of a specific type, use :first-of-type.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
How would you style only the first paragraph inside a <div> using :first-child?
Use div p:first-child { /* styles */ }. This styles a p only if it is the first child of the div.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What happens if you use :last-child on an element that is not the last child?
The style will not apply because :last-child only matches elements that are the last child of their parent.
Click to reveal answer
Which CSS selector targets the first child element of its parent?
A:first-child
B:last-child
C:nth-child(2)
D:only-child
What does li:last-child select?
AThe last <code>li</code> inside its parent
BAll <code>li</code> elements
CThe first <code>li</code> inside its parent
DOnly <code>li</code> elements with no siblings
If a p is the second child of a div, will div p:first-child style it?
AYes, always
BNo, only if it is the first child
CYes, if it is the only <code>p</code>
DNo, it styles the last child
Which selector would style the last li in a list?
Ali:first-child
Bli:nth-child(1)
Cli:last-child
Dli:only-child
What is true about :first-child and :last-child selectors?
AThey select all children of a parent.
BThey select elements by their class name.
CThey select elements by their ID.
DThey select elements based on their position among siblings.
Explain how the :first-child and :last-child selectors work in CSS.
Think about how these selectors depend on the element's position among siblings.
You got /3 concepts.
    Describe a real-life example where you would use :first-child or :last-child in styling a webpage.
    Consider menus, lists, or groups of items on a page.
    You got /3 concepts.

      Practice

      (1/5)
      1. What does the CSS selector :first-child do?
      easy
      A. It selects the last child element inside its parent.
      B. It selects the first child element inside its parent.
      C. It selects all child elements except the first.
      D. It selects only the parent element.

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Understand the selector purpose

        The :first-child selector targets only the very first child element within a parent container.
      2. Step 2: Compare with other options

        :last-child targets the last child, others do not match the description.
      3. Final Answer:

        It selects the first child element inside its parent. -> Option B
      4. Quick Check:

        :first-child = first child selected [OK]
      Hint: First-child always picks the very first element inside a parent [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Confusing :first-child with :last-child
      • Thinking it selects all children
      • Assuming it selects the parent
      2. Which of the following is the correct CSS syntax to style the last child of a <ul> list?
      easy
      A. ul > li:last-child { color: red; }
      B. ul:last-child { color: red; }
      C. ul li:first-child { color: red; }
      D. ul:last-child li { color: red; }

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Identify the target element

        The goal is to style the last <li> inside a <ul>, so the selector must target li elements that are last children.
      2. Step 2: Check selector correctness

        ul > li:last-child correctly selects the last li directly inside ul. Other options either select the wrong element or use incorrect syntax.
      3. Final Answer:

        ul > li:last-child { color: red; } -> Option A
      4. Quick Check:

        Correct syntax for last child inside ul = ul > li:last-child { color: red; } [OK]
      Hint: Use parent > child:last-child to style last child only [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Using :last-child on the parent instead of the child
      • Confusing :first-child with :last-child
      • Missing the direct child combinator >
      3. Given this HTML:
      <ul>
        <li>Apple</li>
        <li>Banana</li>
        <li>Cherry</li>
      </ul>

      And CSS:
      li:first-child { color: blue; }
      li:last-child { color: green; }

      What color will the text "Banana" have when rendered?
      medium
      A. Blue
      B. Green
      C. Black (default)
      D. Both blue and green

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Identify which elements get styled

        li:first-child styles the first li (Apple), li:last-child styles the last li (Cherry).
      2. Step 2: Determine Banana's position

        Banana is the second li, so it is neither first nor last child, so no color styles apply.
      3. Final Answer:

        Black (default) -> Option C
      4. Quick Check:

        Banana is middle child, no color applied [OK]
      Hint: Only first or last child get styles, middle ones stay default [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Assuming all list items get styled
      • Confusing order of children
      • Thinking styles cascade to siblings
      4. This CSS code is intended to color the first and last paragraphs inside a <section> green and blue respectively:
      section p:first-child { color: green; }
      section p:last-child { color: blue; }

      But only the first paragraph turns green, the last paragraph stays black. Why?
      medium
      A. Because the colors green and blue are invalid.
      B. Because the CSS syntax is incorrect.
      C. Because section cannot contain paragraphs.
      D. Because p elements are not the first or last child of section.

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Understand :first-child and :last-child context

        These selectors check if the element is the very first or last child of its parent, regardless of type.
      2. Step 2: Check if p is first or last child

        If other elements (like headings or divs) come before or after the p, then p is not first or last child, so styles won't apply.
      3. Final Answer:

        Because p elements are not the first or last child of section. -> Option D
      4. Quick Check:

        :first-child and :last-child depend on element position, not type [OK]
      Hint: Check if element is truly first/last child, not just first/last of type [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Assuming :first-child means first of type
      • Ignoring other sibling elements
      • Thinking syntax is wrong when it's position issue
      5. You want to style the first and last <li> elements inside every <ul> differently, but only if the <li> is also the first or last child of its parent. Which CSS selectors correctly achieve this?
      hard
      A. ul > li:first-child { font-weight: bold; } and ul > li:last-child { font-style: italic; }
      B. ul:first-child li { font-weight: bold; } and ul:last-child li { font-style: italic; }
      C. ul li:first-child { font-weight: bold; } and ul li:last-child { font-style: italic; }
      D. ul li:first-of-type { font-weight: bold; } and ul li:last-of-type { font-style: italic; }

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Understand the requirement

        We want to style only li elements that are the first or last child of their ul parent.
      2. Step 2: Choose selectors that target direct children and correct position

        ul > li:first-child and ul > li:last-child select li elements that are direct children and first or last child respectively. This matches the requirement exactly.
      3. Step 3: Evaluate other options

        ul li:first-child { font-weight: bold; } and ul li:last-child { font-style: italic; } misses the direct child combinator, which can cause incorrect matches if nested lists exist. ul:first-child li { font-weight: bold; } and ul:last-child li { font-style: italic; } incorrectly applies :first-child to ul. ul li:first-of-type { font-weight: bold; } and ul li:last-of-type { font-style: italic; } uses :first-of-type which selects first li regardless of position among siblings.
      4. Final Answer:

        ul > li:first-child { font-weight: bold; } and ul > li:last-child { font-style: italic; } -> Option A
      5. Quick Check:

        Direct child + :first-child and :last-child = ul > li:first-child { font-weight: bold; } and ul > li:last-child { font-style: italic; } [OK]
      Hint: Use direct child combinator > with :first-child and :last-child [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Omitting > combinator causing wrong matches
      • Confusing :first-child with :first-of-type
      • Applying selectors to wrong parent element