0
0
Compiler Designknowledge~10 mins

Parse trees and derivations in Compiler Design - Step-by-Step Execution

Choose your learning style9 modes available
Concept Flow - Parse trees and derivations
Start with Grammar
Input String
Apply Production Rules
Build Parse Tree Step-by-Step
Derivation Sequence
Final Parse Tree and Derivation
The process starts with a grammar and an input string, applies production rules step-by-step to build a parse tree, showing the derivation sequence until the final parse tree is complete.
Execution Sample
Compiler Design
Grammar:
S -> a S b | ε
Input: a a b b
Derivation:
S => a S b => a a S b b => a a b b
Shows how the input string 'a a b b' is derived from the start symbol S using production rules, building the parse tree.
Analysis Table
StepCurrent StringProduction AppliedResulting StringParse Tree Node Added
1SS -> a S ba S bRoot S with children 'a', S, 'b'
2a S bS -> a S ba a S b bExpand S node to 'a', S, 'b'
3a a S b bS -> εa a b bReplace S with ε (empty)
4a a b bNonea a b bParse tree complete
💡 No more non-terminals to expand; input string fully derived.
State Tracker
VariableStartAfter 1After 2After 3Final
Current StringSa S ba a S b ba a b ba a b b
Parse Tree NodesRoot SS with 'a', S, 'b'Expanded S againS replaced by εComplete tree
Key Insights - 2 Insights
Why do we replace S with ε in step 3?
Because the production S -> ε means S can be empty, which ends the expansion. This is shown in execution_table row 3 where the current string changes from 'a a S b b' to 'a a b b'.
How does the parse tree grow with each production?
Each production adds nodes to the parse tree representing the applied rule. For example, in step 1 and 2, the S node expands to 'a', S, 'b', adding branches as shown in execution_table rows 1 and 2.
Visual Quiz - 3 Questions
Test your understanding
Look at the execution_table, what is the Current String after step 2?
Aa S b
Ba a S b b
Ca a b b
DS
💡 Hint
Check the 'Current String' column in row 2 of the execution_table.
At which step is the production S -> ε applied?
AStep 3
BStep 2
CStep 1
DStep 4
💡 Hint
Look at the 'Production Applied' column to find where S -> ε is used.
If we did not use S -> ε, what would happen to the parse tree?
AIt would be the same
BIt would be smaller
CIt would keep expanding infinitely
DIt would be incomplete
💡 Hint
Refer to variable_tracker showing how S expands and the role of ε in stopping expansions.
Concept Snapshot
Parse trees show how input strings are generated from grammar rules.
Derivations are sequences of rule applications.
Start from start symbol, apply productions stepwise.
Each step expands non-terminals in the string.
Parse tree nodes represent grammar symbols and expansions.
ε means empty string, used to end expansions.
Full Transcript
Parse trees and derivations explain how a string is formed from grammar rules. Starting with the start symbol, we apply production rules step-by-step. Each step replaces a non-terminal with the right side of a rule, building the parse tree. The derivation sequence shows these replacements as strings. When a non-terminal is replaced by ε, it means it produces an empty string, ending that branch. The parse tree visually represents this process, with nodes for symbols and branches for expansions. This helps understand how compilers analyze code structure.