Why Testing with ethers.js in Blockchain / Solidity? - Purpose & Use Cases

The Big Idea

What if you could catch costly blockchain bugs instantly without spending a dime?

The Scenario

Imagine you wrote a smart contract and want to check if it works correctly. Without testing tools, you'd have to deploy it on a real blockchain every time and manually check if it behaves as expected.

The Problem

This manual way is slow, costly, and full of mistakes. Deploying costs real money and waiting for confirmations wastes time. Also, it's easy to miss bugs or forget to test some parts.

The Solution

Testing with ethers.js lets you write automated tests that run quickly on a local blockchain. You can simulate transactions, check results instantly, and catch errors before spending real money.

Before vs After

✗ Before

Deploy contract on mainnet
Send transactions manually
Check results by hand

✓ After

await contract.functionCall()
expect(await contract.value()).to.equal(expected)

What It Enables

It makes smart contract development faster, safer, and more reliable by automating checks before real deployment.

Real Life Example

A developer writes tests to verify a token contract correctly updates balances after transfers, catching bugs early without spending gas fees.

Key Takeaways

Manual testing on blockchain is slow and costly.

ethers.js testing automates and speeds up checks.

Automated tests help catch bugs before real deployment.

Practice

1. What is the main purpose of using ethers.js in testing smart contracts?

easy

A. To create new blockchain networks

B. To design the user interface of a blockchain app

C. To mine new blocks on the blockchain

D. To interact with smart contracts and verify their behavior programmatically

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand ethers.js role

   ethers.js is a library that helps developers interact with Ethereum smart contracts in code.

2. Step 2: Identify testing purpose

   In testing, ethers.js lets you call contract functions and check if they behave as expected.

3. Final Answer:

   To interact with smart contracts and verify their behavior programmatically -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   ethers.js tests contract behavior = A [OK]

Hint: Remember: ethers.js tests contracts by calling their functions [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing ethers.js with UI design tools
• Thinking ethers.js mines blocks
• Assuming ethers.js creates blockchains

2. Which of the following is the correct way to get a signer from a provider in ethers.js?

easy

A. const signer = provider.signer();

B. const signer = provider.getSigner();

C. const signer = provider.getsigner();

D. const signer = provider.sign();

Solution

1. Step 1: Recall ethers.js signer method

   The correct method to get a signer from a provider is getSigner() with capital S.

2. Step 2: Check method spelling and casing

   Options B, C, and D have incorrect method names or casing.

3. Final Answer:

   const signer = provider.getSigner(); -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Correct method is getSigner() = A [OK]

Hint: Method names are case-sensitive; use getSigner() exactly [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using wrong casing like signer() instead of getSigner()
• Misspelling method names
• Confusing signer with sign

3. Consider this ethers.js test code snippet:

const tx = await contract.setValue(42);
await tx.wait();
const value = await contract.getValue();
console.log(value);

What will be printed to the console?

medium

A. 42

B. undefined

C. Transaction hash

D. Error: contract.getValue is not a function

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand transaction and wait

   The code calls setValue(42) on the contract, then waits for the transaction to confirm with tx.wait().

2. Step 2: Retrieve stored value

   After confirmation, it calls getValue() which returns the stored value 42.

3. Final Answer:

   42 -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Confirmed setValue(42) then getValue() = 42 [OK]

Hint: Always wait for tx confirmation before reading updated state [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Not awaiting tx.wait() before reading value
• Expecting transaction hash instead of value
• Assuming getValue() is undefined

4. You wrote this test code but it throws an error:

const tx = contract.setValue(10);
await tx.wait();

What is the likely cause of the error?

medium

A. Missing await before contract.setValue(10)

B. tx.wait() is not a function

C. contract.setValue does not exist

D. Provider is not connected

Solution

1. Step 1: Check async call to contract method

   contract.setValue(10) returns a Promise, so it must be awaited to get the transaction object.

2. Step 2: Identify missing await issue

   Without await, tx is a Promise, which does not have a wait() method, causing the error.

3. Final Answer:

   Missing await before contract.setValue(10) -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Await async call before tx.wait() = C [OK]

Hint: Always await contract calls returning transactions before wait() [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Forgetting await before async contract calls
• Assuming tx is transaction without awaiting
• Not checking provider connection first

5. You want to test a smart contract function transfer(address to, uint amount) that emits an event Transfer. Which ethers.js testing approach correctly waits for the transaction and verifies the event was emitted?

hard

A. await contract.transfer(addr, 100);
expect(tx.events[0].event).to.equal('Transfer');

B. const receipt = await contract.transfer(addr, 100);
expect(receipt.events[0].event).to.equal('Transfer');

C. const tx = await contract.transfer(addr, 100);
const receipt = await tx.wait();
expect(receipt.events[0].event).to.equal('Transfer');

D. const tx = contract.transfer(addr, 100);
expect(tx.events[0].event).to.equal('Transfer');

Solution

1. Step 1: Await the transaction call

   Use await to get the transaction object from contract.transfer.

2. Step 2: Wait for transaction confirmation and get receipt

   Call tx.wait() to get the receipt which contains event logs.

3. Step 3: Verify event in receipt

   Check receipt.events[0].event equals 'Transfer' to confirm event emitted.

4. Final Answer:

   const tx = await contract.transfer(addr, 100); const receipt = await tx.wait(); expect(receipt.events[0].event).to.equal('Transfer'); -> Option C

5. Quick Check:

   Await tx, wait receipt, check event = D [OK]

Hint: Always await tx, then wait for receipt to check events [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Not awaiting transaction before wait()
• Trying to access events on tx instead of receipt
• Ignoring event verification after transaction