Bird
Raised Fist0

Suppose the problem changes: the binary tree is no longer complete but only a general binary tree. Which of the following statements about counting nodes efficiently is true?

hard🎤 Interviewer Follow-up Q15 of Q15
Tree: Depth-First Search - Count Complete Tree Nodes
Suppose the problem changes: the binary tree is no longer complete but only a general binary tree. Which of the following statements about counting nodes efficiently is true?
ABreadth-first search (BFS) can count nodes in O(log n) time for any binary tree.
BThe optimal binary search approach on the last level still applies with minor modifications.
CUsing tree height to check perfect subtrees can still reduce time complexity to O((log n)^2).
DA simple DFS traversal counting all nodes is the only guaranteed correct method with O(n) time.
Step-by-Step Solution
Solution:
  1. Step 1: Understand the problem change

    The tree is no longer complete, so properties used by optimal methods do not hold.
  2. Step 2: Identify correct counting method

    Only a full traversal (DFS or BFS) guarantees counting all nodes correctly in O(n) time.
  3. Final Answer:

    Option D -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Optimal methods rely on completeness, which is lost here [OK]
Quick Trick: Without completeness, must traverse all nodes [OK]
Common Mistakes:
MISTAKES
  • Trying to apply binary search on last level
  • Assuming height checks still reduce complexity
Trap Explanation:
PITFALL
  • Candidates often try to reuse optimal approach ignoring completeness requirement.
Interviewer Note:
CONTEXT
  • Tests if candidate understands problem constraints and when optimal methods apply.
Master "Count Complete Tree Nodes" in Tree: Depth-First Search

3 interactive learning modes - each teaches the same concept differently

Want More Practice?

15+ quiz questions · All difficulty levels · Free

Free Signup - Practice All Questions
More Tree: Depth-First Search Quizzes