Bird
Raised Fist0
Interview Prepsubsets-combinationsmediumAmazonFacebookGoogleMicrosoft

Subsets

Choose your preparation mode4 modes available
▶
Steps
setup

Initialize variables

We start by determining the length of the input list and initializing an empty list to hold all subsets.

💡 Knowing the input size is essential to calculate how many subsets exist (2^n). The result list will store all subsets generated.
Line:n = len(nums) result = []
💡 The number of subsets depends on the input size; initializing result prepares to collect answers.
📊
Subsets - Watch the Algorithm Execute, Step by Step
Watching each bitmask and subset construction step reveals how binary representation maps directly to subset inclusion, making the concept of subsets concrete and intuitive.
Step 1/18
·Active fill★Answer cell
enteringnums=[1,2,3]
Call Path (current → root)
subsets([1,2,3])
Remaining
mask in range(0,8)
choosingnums=[1,2,3]
Call Path (current → root)
subsets([1,2,3])
Remaining
mask=0 to 7
choosingnums=[1,2,3]
Call Path (current → root)
subsets([1,2,3])
Tried
bit 0 excluded
Remaining
bit 1bit 2
choosingnums=[1,2,3]
Call Path (current → root)
subsets([1,2,3])
Tried
bit 0 excludedbit 1 excluded
Remaining
bit 2
choosingnums=[1,2,3]
Call Path (current → root)
subsets([1,2,3])
Tried
bit 0 excludedbit 1 excludedbit 2 excluded
backtrackingnums=[1,2,3]
Call Path (current → root)
subsets([1,2,3])
Tried
mask=0 processed
Remaining
mask=1 to 7
Found 1: []
choosingnums=[1,2,3]
Call Path (current → root)
subsets([1,2,3])
Tried
mask=0 processed
Remaining
mask=1 to 7
Found 1: []
choosingnums=[1,2,3]
Call Path (current → root)
subsets([1,2,3])
Tried
bit 0 included
Remaining
bit 1bit 2
Partial: [1]
Found 1: []
choosingnums=[1,2,3]
Call Path (current → root)
subsets([1,2,3])
Tried
bit 0 includedbit 1 excluded
Remaining
bit 2
Partial: [1]
Found 1: []
choosingnums=[1,2,3]
Call Path (current → root)
subsets([1,2,3])
Tried
bit 0 includedbit 1 excludedbit 2 excluded
Partial: [1]
Found 1: []
backtrackingnums=[1,2,3]
Call Path (current → root)
subsets([1,2,3])
Tried
mask=0 processedmask=1 processed
Remaining
mask=2 to 7
Found 2: [] [1]
choosingnums=[1,2,3]
Call Path (current → root)
subsets([1,2,3])
Tried
mask=0 processedmask=1 processed
Remaining
mask=2 to 7
Found 2: [] [1]
choosingnums=[1,2,3]
Call Path (current → root)
subsets([1,2,3])
Tried
bit 0 excluded
Remaining
bit 1bit 2
Found 2: [] [1]
choosingnums=[1,2,3]
Call Path (current → root)
subsets([1,2,3])
Tried
bit 0 excludedbit 1 included
Remaining
bit 2
Partial: [2]
Found 2: [] [1]
choosingnums=[1,2,3]
Call Path (current → root)
subsets([1,2,3])
Tried
bit 0 excludedbit 1 includedbit 2 excluded
Partial: [2]
Found 2: [] [1]
backtrackingnums=[1,2,3]
Call Path (current → root)
subsets([1,2,3])
Tried
mask=0 processedmask=1 processedmask=2 processed
Remaining
mask=3 to 7
Found 3: [1] [2]
choosingnums=[1,2,3]
Call Path (current → root)
subsets([1,2,3])
Tried
mask=0 processedmask=1 processedmask=2 processed
Remaining
mask=3mask=4mask=5mask=6mask=7
Found 3: [1] [2]
backtrackingnums=[1,2,3]
Call Path (current → root)
subsets([1,2,3])
Tried
mask=0 processedmask=1 processedmask=2 processedmask=3 processedmask=4 processedmask=5 processedmask=6 processedmask=7 processed
Found 8: [2,3] [1,2,3]

Key Takeaways

✓ Each subset corresponds exactly to a unique bitmask from 0 to 2^n - 1.

This insight is hard to see from code alone because the binary representation connection is implicit, but the visualization makes it explicit.

✓ Checking each bit in the mask systematically decides inclusion or exclusion of each element.

Seeing each bit checked one by one clarifies how subsets are constructed element-by-element.

✓ The algorithm exhaustively enumerates all subsets without pruning, ensuring completeness.

Understanding that no subsets are skipped helps learners trust the algorithm's correctness.

Practice

(1/5)
1. You need to generate all unique groups of size k from numbers 1 to n without repetition, where order within each group does not matter. Which algorithmic approach guarantees generating all such groups efficiently without duplicates?
easy
A. Backtracking that explores all number choices with pruning to avoid duplicates
B. Greedy selection picking the smallest available number until group size is reached
C. Dynamic programming to count subsets but not generate them explicitly
D. Sorting all numbers and then selecting consecutive sequences of length k

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the problem requires all unique combinations of size k from n numbers

    Greedy or sorting consecutive sequences do not guarantee all unique combinations without duplicates.
  2. Step 2: Backtracking with pruning systematically explores all valid combinations and avoids duplicates by controlling start indices

    This approach ensures all unique groups are generated efficiently.
  3. Final Answer:

    Option A -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Backtracking with pruning is the standard approach for combinations [OK]
Hint: Backtracking with pruning avoids duplicates efficiently [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking greedy or sorting consecutive sequences generate all combinations
2. Consider the following Python code implementing the optimal backtracking with bitmask and memoization approach for the Matchsticks to Square problem. Given the input [1,1,2,2,2], what is the final return value of makesquare([1,1,2,2,2])?
easy
A. True
B. Depends on the order of matchsticks
C. Raises an exception due to index error
D. False

Solution

  1. Step 1: Calculate total and side length

    Total = 1+1+2+2+2 = 8, side = 8/4 = 2.
  2. Step 2: Trace backtracking calls

    Sorted sticks: [2,2,2,1,1]. The algorithm tries to form sides of length 2. It can form three sides with three 2's, and the last side with two 1's. Hence, returns true.
  3. Final Answer:

    Option A -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Sum divisible by 4 and sticks fit sides exactly [OK]
Hint: Sum divisible by 4 and sticks fit sides exactly [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Forgetting to sort and prune
  • Assuming order affects result
  • Miscounting sides formed
3. Consider the following Python function implementing backtracking with bitmask memoization for partitioning an array into k equal sum subsets. Given nums = [4, 3, 2, 3, 5, 2, 1] and k = 4, what is the final return value of canPartitionKSubsets(nums, k)?
easy
A. True
B. False
C. Raises an exception due to index error
D. Returns None

Solution

  1. Step 1: Calculate total and target sum

    Total sum is 4+3+2+3+5+2+1=20, target per subset = 20/4=5.
  2. Step 2: Trace backtracking with sorted nums

    Sorted nums: [5,4,3,3,2,2,1]. The algorithm finds subsets: {5}, {4,1}, {3,2}, {3,2} all summing to 5, so returns True.
  3. Final Answer:

    Option A -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    All subsets sum to target, so partition possible [OK]
Hint: Sum divisible by k and backtracking finds valid subsets [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Miscounting sum or target
  • Assuming no solution due to order
4. Consider the following Python code for generating subsets with duplicates. What is the value of res after processing the input [1, 2, 2]?
easy
A. [[], [1], [2], [1, 2], [2, 2], [1, 2, 2]]
B. [[], [1], [2], [1, 2], [2, 2], [1, 2, 2], [2]]
C. [[], [1], [2], [1, 2], [2, 2], [1, 2, 2], [1]]
D. [[], [1], [2], [1, 2], [2, 2], [1, 2, 2], [1, 2]]

Solution

  1. Step 1: Trace iterations for input [1, 2, 2]

    Start with res = [[]]. - i=0 (num=1): s=0, start=1, add [1] -> res = [[], [1]] - i=1 (num=2): s=0, start=2, add [2], [1,2] -> res = [[], [1], [2], [1,2]] - i=2 (num=2): duplicate, s=start from previous iteration=2, start=4, add [2,2], [1,2,2] -> res = [[], [1], [2], [1,2], [2,2], [1,2,2]]
  2. Step 2: Confirm final res matches option

    The final res contains exactly these subsets without duplicates: [], [1], [2], [1,2], [2,2], [1,2,2].
  3. Final Answer:

    Option A -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Output matches expected unique subsets for input [1,2,2] [OK]
Hint: Duplicate skips start index to avoid repeats [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Appending duplicates multiple times by resetting s=0 always
  • Off-by-one errors in start index
  • Including extra subsets from previous iterations
5. The following code attempts to count subsets with sum K using space-optimized DP. Identify the line that contains a subtle bug that can cause incorrect results.
def count_subsets_space_optimized(arr, K):
    dp = [0] * (K + 1)
    dp[0] = 1
    for num in arr:
        for j in range(num, K + 1):
            dp[j] += dp[j - num]
    return dp[K]
medium
A. for j in range(num, K + 1):
B. dp[0] = 1
C. dp = [0] * (K + 1)
D. dp[j] += dp[j - num]

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze iteration order

    The inner loop iterates forward from num to K, which causes dp[j] to use updated dp values from the same iteration, leading to overcounting.
  2. Step 2: Correct iteration direction

    To avoid overcounting, the inner loop must iterate backward from K down to num.
  3. Final Answer:

    Option A -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Forward iteration in DP causes incorrect counts -> bug in loop range [OK]
Hint: Inner loop must iterate backward to avoid reuse of updated dp values [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using forward iteration in space-optimized DP
  • Misunderstanding dp update dependencies
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard