Bird
Raised Fist0
Interview Prepsubsets-combinationshardAmazonGoogleFacebook

Number of Valid Words for Each Puzzle

Choose your preparation mode4 modes available

Start learning this pattern below

Jump into concepts and practice - no test required

or
Recommended
Test this pattern10 questions across easy, medium, and hard to know if this pattern is strong
Steps
setup

Initialize Trie and Insert Word Masks

Start by creating an empty trie root node. Prepare to insert bitmask representations of words with up to 7 unique letters.

💡 Building the trie is essential to efficiently represent all word letter subsets for quick lookup during puzzle queries.
Line:self.root = TrieNode()
💡 The trie root node is the starting point for all word insertions and puzzle traversals.
📊
Number of Valid Words for Each Puzzle - Watch the Algorithm Execute, Step by Step
Watching the trie construction and recursive traversal step-by-step reveals how bitmasking and pruning efficiently solve a complex subset problem.
Step 1/20
·Active fillAnswer cell
entering
Call Path (current → root)
root call
backtrackingmask=1
Call Path (current → root)
insert(mask=1)
Tried
0
Partial: [0]
backtrackingmask=262145
Call Path (current → root)
insert(mask=262145)
Tried
018
Partial: [0, 18]
backtrackingmask=4753
Call Path (current → root)
insert(mask=4753)
Tried
01411
Partial: [0, 1, 4, 11]
enteringnode="root"puzzle_mask=1064961first_bit=0has_first=false
Call Path (current → root)
dfs(root, puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=False)
Remaining
012142425
enteringnode="child for 'a'"puzzle_mask=1064961first_bit=0has_first=true
Call Path (current → root)
dfs(child 'a', puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(root, puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=False)
Remaining
18111
Partial: [0]
choosingnode="child 'a'"puzzle_mask=1064961first_bit=0has_first=true
Call Path (current → root)
dfs(child 'a', puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(root, puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=False)
Remaining
18111
Partial: [0]
pruningnode="child 'a'"puzzle_mask=1064961first_bit=0has_first=true
Call Path (current → root)
dfs(child 'a', puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(root, puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=False)
Tried
18
Remaining
111
Partial: [0]
Letter 's' not in puzzle
enteringnode="child 'b'"puzzle_mask=1064961first_bit=0has_first=true
Call Path (current → root)
dfs(child 'b', puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(child 'a', puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(root, puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=False)
Remaining
4
Partial: [0, 1]
enteringnode="child 'e'"puzzle_mask=1064961first_bit=0has_first=true
Call Path (current → root)
dfs(child 'e', puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(child 'b', puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(child 'a', puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(root, puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=False)
Remaining
11
Partial: [0, 1, 4]
choosingnode="child 'l'"puzzle_mask=1064961first_bit=0has_first=true
Call Path (current → root)
dfs(child 'l', puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(child 'e', puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(child 'b', puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(child 'a', puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(root, puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=False)
Partial: [0, 1, 4, 11]
backtrackingnode="child 'l'"puzzle_mask=1064961first_bit=0has_first=true
Call Path (current → root)
dfs(child 'l', puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(child 'e', puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(child 'b', puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(child 'a', puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(root, puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=False)
Partial: [0, 1, 4, 11]
backtrackingnode="root"puzzle_mask=1064961first_bit=0has_first=false
Call Path (current → root)
dfs(root, puzzle_mask=1064961, first_bit=0, has_first=False)
Tried
01
Found 1: [1]
enteringnode="root"puzzle_mask=1081343first_bit=0has_first=false
Call Path (current → root)
dfs(root, puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=False)
Remaining
0111192025
Found 1: [1]
enteringnode="child 'a'"puzzle_mask=1081343first_bit=0has_first=true
Call Path (current → root)
dfs(child 'a', puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(root, puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=False)
Remaining
141118
Partial: [0]
Found 1: [1]
enteringnode="child 'b'"puzzle_mask=1081343first_bit=0has_first=true
Call Path (current → root)
dfs(child 'b', puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(child 'a', puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(root, puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=False)
Remaining
411
Partial: [0, 1]
Found 1: [1]
enteringnode="child 'e'"puzzle_mask=1081343first_bit=0has_first=true
Call Path (current → root)
dfs(child 'e', puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(child 'b', puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(child 'a', puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(root, puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=False)
Remaining
11
Partial: [0, 1, 4]
Found 1: [1]
choosingnode="child 'l'"puzzle_mask=1081343first_bit=0has_first=true
Call Path (current → root)
dfs(child 'l', puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(child 'e', puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(child 'b', puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(child 'a', puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(root, puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=False)
Partial: [0, 1, 4, 11]
Found 1: [1]
backtrackingnode="child 'l'"puzzle_mask=1081343first_bit=0has_first=true
Call Path (current → root)
dfs(child 'l', puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(child 'e', puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(child 'b', puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(child 'a', puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=True)
dfs(root, puzzle_mask=1081343, first_bit=0, has_first=False)
Partial: [0, 1, 4, 11]
Found 1: [1]
Answer: [1,1,3,2,4,0]
Total calls: 50 · Pruned: 15

Key Takeaways

Trie structure efficiently encodes all word letter subsets for fast lookup.

This insight is hard to see from code alone because the trie is implicit and built incrementally.

Recursive DFS prunes branches not in puzzle letters, drastically reducing search space.

Visualizing pruning clarifies why the algorithm is efficient despite exponential subsets.

Including the puzzle's first letter in the path is mandatory and tracked via has_first flag.

This subtle condition is critical and often overlooked when reading code without visualization.

Practice

(1/5)
1. Consider the following Python code implementing combination sum with reuse allowed:
from typing import List

def combinationSum(candidates: List[int], target: int) -> List[List[int]]:
    candidates.sort()
    result = []
    def backtrack(index, path, target):
        if target == 0:
            result.append(path[:])
            return
        if index == len(candidates) or target < 0:
            return
        max_use = target // candidates[index]
        for count in range(max_use + 1):
            backtrack(index + 1, path + [candidates[index]] * count, target - candidates[index] * count)
    backtrack(0, [], target)
    return result

print(combinationSum([2,3,6,7], 7))
What is the exact output of this code?
easy
A. [[7]]
B. [[2, 2, 3], [7]]
C. [[2, 2, 3]]
D. [[7], [2, 2, 3]]

Solution

  1. Step 1: Trace backtrack calls for candidates=[2,3,6,7], target=7

    Sorted candidates: [2,3,6,7]. The function tries counts of 2 from 0 to 3 (max_use=3), then recurses on next index. Valid combinations found are [7] and [2,2,3].
  2. Step 2: Check order of results appended

    Backtracking explores index 0 with counts 0..3, then index 1, so [7] is found after [2,2,3]. The result list appends [7] first, then [2,2,3]. But since the code appends when target==0, the order is [[7], [2, 2, 3]].
  3. Final Answer:

    Option D -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Output matches expected combinations with correct order [OK]
Hint: Order depends on recursion path, not sorted output [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming output is sorted by combination length or lex order
  • Missing one valid combination
2. You are given an unsorted array of positive integers. Your task is to find the largest subset such that for every pair (Si, Sj) in the subset, either Si divides Sj or Sj divides Si. Which algorithmic approach guarantees finding the optimal solution efficiently?
easy
A. Greedy approach by always picking the smallest element and adding divisible elements afterwards
B. Use a brute force backtracking to generate all subsets and check divisibility
C. Sort the array and use dynamic programming to build the longest chain where each element divides the next
D. Use a graph traversal to find the largest clique where edges represent divisibility

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand problem constraints

    The problem requires a subset where every pair is divisible in one direction, which suggests a chain-like structure.
  2. Step 2: Identify suitable algorithm

    Sorting the array allows divisibility checks to be done efficiently in increasing order, enabling dynamic programming to build the longest divisible chain.
  3. Final Answer:

    Option C -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Sorting + DP is classic for largest divisible subset [OK]
Hint: Sort + DP builds longest divisible chain [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Greedy fails because local choices don't guarantee global maximum
  • Brute force is correct but inefficient, not practical
  • Graph clique approach is incorrect because divisibility is not symmetric
3. You need to generate all possible subsets of a given set of distinct integers. Which approach guarantees generating every subset exactly once with a time complexity proportional to the number of subsets times the size of each subset?
easy
A. Greedy algorithm that picks elements based on their value order
B. Enumerate all bitmasks from 0 to 2^n - 1, selecting elements where bits are set
C. Dynamic programming to count subsets without generating them
D. Sorting the array and using two pointers to find pairs

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the problem

    We want to generate all subsets of a set, which are 2^n in number.
  2. Step 2: Identify the approach that enumerates all subsets

    Bitmask enumeration from 0 to 2^n - 1 maps each bit to an element's inclusion, guaranteeing all subsets exactly once.
  3. Final Answer:

    Option B -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Bitmask enumeration covers all subsets systematically [OK]
Hint: Bitmask from 0 to 2^n-1 enumerates all subsets [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking greedy or sorting can generate all subsets efficiently
4. The following code attempts to count subsets with sum K using space-optimized DP. Identify the line that contains a subtle bug that can cause incorrect results.
def count_subsets_space_optimized(arr, K):
    dp = [0] * (K + 1)
    dp[0] = 1
    for num in arr:
        for j in range(num, K + 1):
            dp[j] += dp[j - num]
    return dp[K]
medium
A. for j in range(num, K + 1):
B. dp[0] = 1
C. dp = [0] * (K + 1)
D. dp[j] += dp[j - num]

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze iteration order

    The inner loop iterates forward from num to K, which causes dp[j] to use updated dp values from the same iteration, leading to overcounting.
  2. Step 2: Correct iteration direction

    To avoid overcounting, the inner loop must iterate backward from K down to num.
  3. Final Answer:

    Option A -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Forward iteration in DP causes incorrect counts -> bug in loop range [OK]
Hint: Inner loop must iterate backward to avoid reuse of updated dp values [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using forward iteration in space-optimized DP
  • Misunderstanding dp update dependencies
5. What is the time complexity of generating all subsets of an array of size n using the bit manipulation approach shown below?
medium
A. O(2^n * n) because for each of the 2^n masks, we check n bits to build the subset
B. O(2^n) because there are 2^n subsets and each subset is generated in constant time
C. O(n^2) because of nested loops over n elements
D. O(n * 2^n) because each of the 2^n subsets requires iterating over n elements

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify outer loop complexity

    The outer loop runs 2^n times, once per subset mask.
  2. Step 2: Identify inner loop complexity

    For each mask, the inner loop iterates n times to check each bit.
  3. Final Answer:

    Option D -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Total time is 2^n * n due to mask and bit checks [OK]
Hint: Each subset requires checking n bits -> O(n*2^n) [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming subset generation is O(2^n) ignoring bit checks
  • Confusing n^2 with 2^n * n