Practice
num and an integer k. The task is to remove exactly k digits from num to produce the smallest possible number. Which algorithmic approach guarantees an optimal solution efficiently?Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem constraints
The problem requires removing digits to minimize the resulting number, which suggests a greedy approach that considers digit order.Step 2: Identify the optimal approach
Using a monotonic increasing stack allows removing digits that are larger than the next digit, ensuring the smallest possible number in O(n) time.Final Answer:
Option A -> Option AQuick Check:
Monotonic stack approach is known optimal for this problem [OK]
- Assuming simple greedy removing largest digits left to right is optimal
- Thinking DP is needed for minimal number subsequence
Solution
Step 1: Understand problem constraints
The problem requires summing minimums of all subarrays efficiently, which brute force cannot do in O(n).Step 2: Identify the pattern
Monotonic stack helps find previous less and next less elements in O(n), enabling counting subarrays where each element is minimum.Final Answer:
Option A -> Option AQuick Check:
Monotonic stack approach is known optimal for this problem [OK]
- Assuming greedy or DP solves this in O(n)
- Confusing with maximum subarray problems
Solution
Step 1: Analyze the condition on line 5
The original correct condition isnum < third. Usingnum <= thirdincorrectly returns True when num equals third, which violates strict inequality in 132 pattern.Step 2: Confirm other lines are correct
Iteration order, stack operations, and append are correct and necessary for the algorithm.Final Answer:
Option B -> Option BQuick Check:
Using <= instead of < causes false positives [OK]
- Using <= instead of <
- Confusing iteration direction
- Not popping smaller elements
Solution
Step 1: Handle zero or negative counts
Zero or negative repeats mean skipping or reversing substrings; algorithm must explicitly check counts and skip or handle accordingly.Step 2: Implement substring reuse
Memoization caches decoded substrings to avoid recomputation when reused multiple times, improving efficiency.Step 3: Combine skipping invalid repeats and memoization
Stack-based approach extended with memoization and count checks correctly handles new constraints.Final Answer:
Option B -> Option BQuick Check:
Memoization plus count validation handles reuse and zero/negative repeats [OK]
- Ignoring zero/negative counts
- Failing to cache repeated substrings
Solution
Step 1: Analyze effect of negative values on monotonic stack
The monotonic stack approach relies on relative ordering, which holds regardless of sign.Step 2: Confirm no structural changes needed
Sentinel and strict < comparison still work; negative values do not break the logic.Final Answer:
Option B -> Option BQuick Check:
Monotonic stack handles negatives without modification [OK]
- Assuming negative values require different data structures
- Changing comparison operators unnecessarily
