Practice
k cards from either the start or the end of the row to maximize your total points. Which approach guarantees finding the optimal solution efficiently?Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem constraints
The problem restricts picking cards only from the start or end, so the chosen cards form a prefix and suffix combination.Step 2: Recognize the sliding window pattern
Pickingkcards from ends is equivalent to removing a contiguous subarray of lengthn-kfrom the middle. Finding the minimum sum subarray of lengthn-klets us maximize the points from the ends.Final Answer:
Option B -> Option BQuick Check:
Sliding window on middle subarray -> optimal and efficient [OK]
- Greedy picking highest immediate card fails on future gains
- Brute force is too slow for large inputs
- DP on middle cards is unnecessary and inefficient
s1 and s2. You need to determine if any substring of s2 is a rearrangement (permutation) of s1. Which algorithmic approach guarantees an optimal solution in terms of time complexity?Solution
Step 1: Understand problem constraints
The problem requires checking if any substring ofs2is a permutation ofs1, which means the substring must have the same character counts ass1.Step 2: Identify optimal approach
Brute force (checking all substrings) is O(n*m) and inefficient. Dynamic programming is not suitable here as the problem is about frequency matching, not overlapping subproblems. Greedy fails because character order can differ. Sliding window with frequency map and match count optimization efficiently tracks character matches in O(n) time.Final Answer:
Option D -> Option DQuick Check:
Sliding window with match count tracks matches in O(n) time [OK]
- Believing greedy or DP solves this efficiently
- Thinking brute force is acceptable for large inputs
p in s, where n = len(s) and m = len(p)?Solution
Step 1: Identify main loop operations
The window slides oversonce, so O(n) iterations.Step 2: Check frequency updates and comparisons
Frequency counts are arrays of fixed size 26, updated in O(1) time; matches count updated in O(1).Final Answer:
Option A -> Option AQuick Check:
Sliding window with count matching is linear time [OK]
- Assuming frequency map comparison is O(m)
- Confusing n*m with n
- Thinking sorting is involved
n is the length of s and m is the length of t?Solution
Step 1: Identify main loops
The algorithm uses two pointers moving over filtered characters, each pointer advances at mostntimes.Step 2: Analyze filtering and counting
Filteringstakes O(n), sliding window over filtered characters is O(n) since each character is visited twice max.Final Answer:
Option A -> Option AQuick Check:
Two-pointer sliding window is linear time [OK]
- Confusing filtering cost
- Assuming nested loops cause O(n^2)
- Ignoring that each pointer moves only forward
Solution
Step 1: Understand non-contiguous picking
Since picking is non-contiguous, order does not matter; we want max total fruits of two types.Step 2: Optimal solution is sum of two largest fruit counts
Count frequency of each fruit type, pick top two counts, sum them for max fruits.Final Answer:
Option A -> Option AQuick Check:
Non-contiguous means subsequence, so frequency sums suffice [OK]
- Applying sliding window to non-contiguous
- Using DP unnecessarily
- Sorting loses subsequence property
