Bird
Raised Fist0

If a system currently uses FIFO page replacement but experiences high page fault rates due to cyclic reference patterns larger than frame count, which modification would most effectively reduce faults without significantly increasing overhead?

hard🎤 Interviewer Follow-up Q10 of Q15
Operating Systems - Page Replacement - FIFO, LRU, Optimal Algorithm
If a system currently uses FIFO page replacement but experiences high page fault rates due to cyclic reference patterns larger than frame count, which modification would most effectively reduce faults without significantly increasing overhead?
AImplement LRU to track recent usage and reduce faults
BUse the Clock algorithm as a low-overhead approximation of LRU
CIncrease the number of frames to accommodate the cycle size
DSwitch to Optimal algorithm to perfectly predict future references
Step-by-Step Solution
Solution:
  1. Step 1: Evaluate options for reducing faults with minimal overhead

    Optimal is impractical due to future knowledge. LRU reduces faults but has high overhead. Increasing frames may not be feasible. Clock approximates LRU with lower overhead, effectively reducing faults.
  2. Final Answer:

    Option B -> Option B
  3. Quick Check:

    Clock balances fault reduction and overhead [OK]
Quick Trick: Clock approximates LRU with less overhead [OK]
Common Mistakes:
MISTAKES
  • Assuming Optimal is practical
  • Ignoring overhead of full LRU
  • Believing only increasing frames helps
Trap Explanation:
PITFALL
  • Candidates often pick Optimal or full LRU ignoring overhead or feasibility constraints.
Interviewer Note:
CONTEXT
  • Tests knowledge of practical algorithm improvements and overhead trade-offs.
Master "Page Replacement - FIFO, LRU, Optimal Algorithm" in Operating Systems

2 interactive learning modes - each teaches the same concept differently

Want More Practice?

15+ quiz questions · All difficulty levels · Free

Free Signup - Practice All Questions
More Operating Systems Quizzes