Hint: Break binary search on first found, then expand boundaries [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Off-by-one errors expanding boundaries
Returning found index only
Confusing indices with values
2. You need to compute x raised to the power n efficiently, where n can be a large integer (positive or negative). Which approach guarantees the optimal time complexity for this problem?
easy
A. Use binary exponentiation by repeatedly squaring x and reducing n by half.
B. Iteratively multiply x by itself n times in a loop.
C. Use dynamic programming to store intermediate powers and build up to x^n.
D. Use a greedy approach to multiply by the largest possible power of x at each step.
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem constraints
We want to compute x^n efficiently for large n, including negative values.
Step 2: Identify the optimal approach
Binary exponentiation (fast exponentiation) reduces the number of multiplications by squaring x and halving n at each step, achieving O(log n) time.
Final Answer:
Option A -> Option A
Quick Check:
Binary exponentiation is the classic optimal approach for power calculation [OK]
Hint: Binary exponentiation halves exponent each step [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking iterative multiplication is efficient for large n
Confusing DP with binary exponentiation
Assuming greedy approach works for powers
3. What is the time complexity of the optimal binary search solution for the Minimum Days to Make m Bouquets problem, given n flowers and day range D = maxDay - minDay?
medium
A. O(n * D) because we check each day sequentially and scan all flowers.
B. O(n log D) because binary search reduces day range and each feasibility check scans n flowers.
C. O(log n * D) because binary search is on flowers and day range is scanned.
D. O(n + D) because we combine linear scans of flowers and days.
Solution
Step 1: Identify outer loop complexity
Binary search runs in O(log D) iterations, where D is the day range.
Step 2: Identify inner loop complexity
Each feasibility check scans all n flowers in O(n) time.
Final Answer:
Option B -> Option B
Quick Check:
Combining gives O(n log D), not O(n * D) or others. [OK]
Hint: Binary search log factor times linear feasibility check [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing linear scan over days as O(n*D)
Mixing binary search on flowers instead of days
4. Suppose the problem is modified so that packages can be shipped in any order (not necessarily the given order) within the given days. Which of the following approaches correctly finds the minimal ship capacity under this new constraint?
hard
A. Use dynamic programming to assign packages to days minimizing maximum load per day, combined with binary search on capacity
B. Sort packages in descending order and use a greedy bin-packing heuristic combined with binary search on capacity
C. Use a simple greedy approach assigning packages to days in any order without binary search
D. Use the same binary search on capacity with the original feasibility check since order doesn't matter
Solution
Step 1: Understand the relaxed constraint
Packages can be shipped in any order, so the problem becomes a variant of multi-way partition or bin packing minimizing max load.
Step 2: Identify correct approach
Binary search on capacity still applies, but feasibility check requires DP or backtracking to assign packages optimally to days, as greedy heuristics may fail.
Step 3: Why other options fail
Original feasibility check assumes fixed order; greedy heuristics are approximate and may not find minimal capacity.
Final Answer:
Option A -> Option A
Quick Check:
DP feasibility check with binary search needed for unordered assignment [OK]
Hint: Order relaxation requires DP feasibility check, not simple greedy [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using original feasibility check ignoring order change
Assuming greedy suffices
Ignoring complexity increase
5. Suppose now you want to make bouquets but flowers can be reused multiple times (i.e., each flower can be counted multiple times for different bouquets). Which modification to the algorithm is correct?
hard
A. Keep the same binary search and feasibility check, but remove resetting flowers count to zero on encountering a flower that blooms after the day.
B. Binary search is no longer applicable; instead, use a greedy approach to pick flowers repeatedly until bouquets are formed.
C. Use binary search on days, but feasibility must count bouquets by grouping any flowers bloomed by day, allowing reuse by not resetting flowers count.
D. Modify feasibility to count total flowers bloomed by day and check if total flowers >= m * k, ignoring adjacency.