Bird
Raised Fist0
Interview Prepknowing-what-to-trackeasyGoogleAmazonFacebook

Summary Ranges

Choose your preparation mode4 modes available
🎯
Summary Ranges
easyHASH_MAPGoogleAmazonFacebook

Imagine you have a list of days when a user logged into an app, and you want to summarize their activity by grouping consecutive login days into ranges.

💡 This problem is about detecting consecutive sequences in a sorted list and summarizing them compactly. Beginners often struggle with tracking the start and end of runs and handling edge cases like single-element ranges.
📋
Problem Statement

Given a sorted unique integer array nums, return the smallest sorted list of ranges that cover all the numbers in the array exactly. That is, each element of nums is covered by exactly one of the ranges, and there is no integer x such that x is in one of the ranges but not in nums. Each range [a,b] in the list should be output as 'a->b' if a != b, and as 'a' if a == b.

1 ≤ nums.length ≤ 10^5-10^9 ≤ nums[i] ≤ 10^9nums is sorted in ascending order and all elements are unique
💡
Example
Input"[0,1,2,4,5,7]"
Output["0->2","4->5","7"]

The numbers 0,1,2 form a consecutive range, 4,5 form another, and 7 stands alone.

Input"[0,2,3,4,6,8,9]"
Output["0","2->4","6","8->9"]

0 is alone, 2,3,4 form a range, 6 alone, and 8,9 form a range.

  • Single element array → output is just that element as a string
  • All elements are consecutive → one big range
  • No consecutive elements → all single-element ranges
  • Negative and positive numbers mixed → ranges still valid
⚠️
Common Mistakes
Not handling single-element ranges correctly

Output includes 'start->start' instead of just 'start'

✅ Add condition to check if start == end and output accordingly

Off-by-one errors in loops when detecting consecutive sequences

Misses last element or causes index out of range errors

✅ Carefully check loop boundaries and conditions

Not adding the last range after loop ends

Last consecutive range is omitted from output

✅ Add code after loop to append the final range

Assuming input array is always non-empty without checking

Code crashes or returns wrong output on empty input

✅ Add guard clause to handle empty input

Using nested loops unnecessarily leading to inefficient solutions

Solution times out on large inputs

✅ Use single pass or two pointers approach for O(n) time

🧠
Brute Force (Nested Loops to Detect Ranges)
💡 Starting with brute force helps understand the problem deeply by explicitly checking every possible consecutive range, even if inefficient.

Intuition

Scan the array from left to right, for each number try to find the longest consecutive range by checking subsequent elements until the sequence breaks.

Algorithm

  1. Initialize an empty list to store ranges.
  2. Use an outer loop to pick the start of a range.
  3. Use an inner loop to move forward while numbers are consecutive.
  4. Add the found range to the result and continue from the next number.
💡 Nested loops make it clear how consecutive sequences are detected but can be inefficient for large inputs.
</>
Code
from typing import List

def summaryRanges(nums: List[int]) -> List[str]:
    ranges = []
    n = len(nums)
    i = 0
    while i < n:
        start = nums[i]
        j = i
        while j + 1 < n and nums[j + 1] == nums[j] + 1:
            j += 1
        end = nums[j]
        if start == end:
            ranges.append(str(start))
        else:
            ranges.append(f"{start}->{end}")
        i = j + 1
    return ranges

# Example usage
if __name__ == "__main__":
    print(summaryRanges([0,1,2,4,5,7]))  # ['0->2', '4->5', '7']
Line Notes
ranges = []Initialize the list to store the final ranges
n = len(nums)Store length of input for loop control
i = 0Initialize index to start scanning from the beginning
while i < n:Outer loop to iterate over all elements
start = nums[i]Mark the start of the current range
j = iInitialize inner loop index to current start
while j + 1 < n and nums[j + 1] == nums[j] + 1:Inner loop to find the end of the consecutive range
j += 1Advance inner loop index while consecutive
end = nums[j]Mark the end of the current consecutive range
if start == end:Check if the range is a single number or multiple
ranges.append(str(start))Add single number as string if no range
ranges.append(f"{start}->{end}")Add range string if multiple numbers
i = j + 1Move to the next new start after the current range
return rangesReturn the list of range strings
import java.util.*;

public class SummaryRanges {
    public static List<String> summaryRanges(int[] nums) {
        List<String> ranges = new ArrayList<>();
        int n = nums.length;
        int i = 0;
        while (i < n) {
            int start = nums[i];
            int j = i;
            while (j + 1 < n && nums[j + 1] == nums[j] + 1) {
                j++;
            }
            int end = nums[j];
            if (start == end) {
                ranges.add(String.valueOf(start));
            } else {
                ranges.add(start + "->" + end);
            }
            i = j + 1;
        }
        return ranges;
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        int[] nums = {0,1,2,4,5,7};
        System.out.println(summaryRanges(nums)); // ["0->2", "4->5", "7"]
    }
}
Line Notes
List<String> ranges = new ArrayList<>();Create list to hold range strings
int n = nums.length;Store length of input array
int i = 0;Initialize index for outer loop
while (i < n) {Outer loop to process all elements
int start = nums[i];Start of current range
int j = i;Initialize inner loop index
while (j + 1 < n && nums[j + 1] == nums[j] + 1) {Find consecutive sequence end
j++;Advance inner loop index while consecutive
int end = nums[j];Mark end of current range
if (start == end) {Check if single number or range
ranges.add(String.valueOf(start));Add single number as string
ranges.add(start + "->" + end);Add range string
i = j + 1;Move index past current range
return ranges;Return list of ranges
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <string>

using namespace std;

vector<string> summaryRanges(vector<int>& nums) {
    vector<string> ranges;
    int n = nums.size();
    int i = 0;
    while (i < n) {
        int start = nums[i];
        int j = i;
        while (j + 1 < n && nums[j + 1] == nums[j] + 1) {
            j++;
        }
        int end = nums[j];
        if (start == end) {
            ranges.push_back(to_string(start));
        } else {
            ranges.push_back(to_string(start) + "->" + to_string(end));
        }
        i = j + 1;
    }
    return ranges;
}

int main() {
    vector<int> nums = {0,1,2,4,5,7};
    vector<string> res = summaryRanges(nums);
    for (auto &s : res) cout << s << " ";
    cout << endl;
    return 0;
}
Line Notes
vector<string> ranges;Initialize vector to store ranges
int n = nums.size();Get size of input vector
int i = 0;Initialize index for outer loop
while (i < n) {Loop over all elements
int start = nums[i];Mark start of current range
int j = i;Initialize inner loop index
while (j + 1 < n && nums[j + 1] == nums[j] + 1) {Find consecutive sequence end
j++;Advance inner loop index while consecutive
int end = nums[j];Mark end of current range
if (start == end) {Check if single number or range
ranges.push_back(to_string(start));Add single number as string
ranges.push_back(to_string(start) + "->" + to_string(end));Add range string
i = j + 1;Move index past current range
return ranges;Return vector of ranges
function summaryRanges(nums) {
    const ranges = [];
    const n = nums.length;
    let i = 0;
    while (i < n) {
        const start = nums[i];
        let j = i;
        while (j + 1 < n && nums[j + 1] === nums[j] + 1) {
            j++;
        }
        const end = nums[j];
        if (start === end) {
            ranges.push(start.toString());
        } else {
            ranges.push(`${start}->${end}`);
        }
        i = j + 1;
    }
    return ranges;
}

// Example usage
console.log(summaryRanges([0,1,2,4,5,7])); // ['0->2', '4->5', '7']
Line Notes
const ranges = [];Initialize array to hold range strings
const n = nums.length;Store length of input array
let i = 0;Initialize index for outer loop
while (i < n) {Loop through all numbers
const start = nums[i];Start of current consecutive range
let j = i;Initialize inner loop index
while (j + 1 < n && nums[j + 1] === nums[j] + 1) {Find end of consecutive range
j++;Advance inner loop index while consecutive
const end = nums[j];Mark end of current range
if (start === end) {Check if single number or range
ranges.push(start.toString());Add single number as string
ranges.push(`${start}->${end}`);Add range string
i = j + 1;Move index past current range
return ranges;Return array of ranges
⏱
Complexity
TimeO(n)
SpaceO(n)

Although there is a nested loop, the inner loop advances the index j forward without resetting, so each element is visited at most once by the inner loop. Hence total time is linear in n.

💡 Even though it looks like nested loops, the inner loop moves forward through the array without going back, so total operations are proportional to n.
Interview Verdict: Accepted but inefficient for large inputs

This approach works and is easy to understand, but the nested loop structure can be misleading about efficiency. It is acceptable for small inputs but not optimal.

🧠
Single Pass Linear Scan
💡 This approach improves efficiency by scanning the array once and tracking the start of each range, avoiding nested loops.

Intuition

Keep track of the start of the current range and extend it while numbers are consecutive; when a break is found, record the range and start a new one.

Algorithm

  1. Initialize an empty list for ranges and set start to the first number.
  2. Iterate through the array from the second element onward.
  3. If current number is not consecutive to previous, close the previous range and start a new one.
  4. After iteration, add the last range to the result.
💡 This linear scan is easier to implement and efficient, but requires careful tracking of range boundaries.
</>
Code
from typing import List

def summaryRanges(nums: List[int]) -> List[str]:
    if not nums:
        return []
    ranges = []
    start = nums[0]
    for i in range(1, len(nums)):
        if nums[i] != nums[i-1] + 1:
            end = nums[i-1]
            if start == end:
                ranges.append(str(start))
            else:
                ranges.append(f"{start}->{end}")
            start = nums[i]
    # Add the last range
    end = nums[-1]
    if start == end:
        ranges.append(str(start))
    else:
        ranges.append(f"{start}->{end}")
    return ranges

# Example usage
if __name__ == "__main__":
    print(summaryRanges([0,1,2,4,5,7]))  # ['0->2', '4->5', '7']
Line Notes
if not nums:Handle empty input edge case to avoid errors
ranges = []Initialize list to store final ranges
start = nums[0]Set start of first range
for i in range(1, len(nums)):Iterate from second element to end
if nums[i] != nums[i-1] + 1:Detect break in consecutive sequence
end = nums[i-1]Mark end of current range before break
if start == end:Check if range is a single number
ranges.append(str(start))Add single number as string
ranges.append(f"{start}->{end}")Add range string for multiple numbers
start = nums[i]Start new range at current number
end = nums[-1]After loop, mark end of last range
return rangesReturn list of range strings
import java.util.*;

public class SummaryRanges {
    public static List<String> summaryRanges(int[] nums) {
        List<String> ranges = new ArrayList<>();
        if (nums.length == 0) return ranges;
        int start = nums[0];
        for (int i = 1; i < nums.length; i++) {
            if (nums[i] != nums[i - 1] + 1) {
                int end = nums[i - 1];
                if (start == end) {
                    ranges.add(String.valueOf(start));
                } else {
                    ranges.add(start + "->" + end);
                }
                start = nums[i];
            }
        }
        int end = nums[nums.length - 1];
        if (start == end) {
            ranges.add(String.valueOf(start));
        } else {
            ranges.add(start + "->" + end);
        }
        return ranges;
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        int[] nums = {0,1,2,4,5,7};
        System.out.println(summaryRanges(nums)); // ["0->2", "4->5", "7"]
    }
}
Line Notes
if (nums.length == 0) return ranges;Handle empty input to avoid errors
List<String> ranges = new ArrayList<>();Initialize list to store ranges
int start = nums[0];Set start of first range
for (int i = 1; i < nums.length; i++) {Iterate from second element
if (nums[i] != nums[i - 1] + 1) {Detect break in consecutive sequence
int end = nums[i - 1];Mark end of current range
if (start == end) {Check if single number range
ranges.add(String.valueOf(start));Add single number as string
ranges.add(start + "->" + end);Add range string for multiple numbers
start = nums[i];Start new range at current number
int end = nums[nums.length - 1];Mark end of last range after loop
return ranges;Return list of ranges
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <string>

using namespace std;

vector<string> summaryRanges(vector<int>& nums) {
    vector<string> ranges;
    if (nums.empty()) return ranges;
    int start = nums[0];
    for (int i = 1; i < nums.size(); i++) {
        if (nums[i] != nums[i - 1] + 1) {
            int end = nums[i - 1];
            if (start == end) {
                ranges.push_back(to_string(start));
            } else {
                ranges.push_back(to_string(start) + "->" + to_string(end));
            }
            start = nums[i];
        }
    }
    int end = nums.back();
    if (start == end) {
        ranges.push_back(to_string(start));
    } else {
        ranges.push_back(to_string(start) + "->" + to_string(end));
    }
    return ranges;
}

int main() {
    vector<int> nums = {0,1,2,4,5,7};
    vector<string> res = summaryRanges(nums);
    for (auto &s : res) cout << s << " ";
    cout << endl;
    return 0;
}
Line Notes
if (nums.empty()) return ranges;Handle empty input to avoid errors
vector<string> ranges;Initialize vector to store ranges
int start = nums[0];Set start of first range
for (int i = 1; i < nums.size(); i++) {Iterate from second element
if (nums[i] != nums[i - 1] + 1) {Detect break in consecutive sequence
int end = nums[i - 1];Mark end of current range
if (start == end) {Check if single number range
ranges.push_back(to_string(start));Add single number as string
ranges.push_back(to_string(start) + "->" + to_string(end));Add range string for multiple numbers
start = nums[i];Start new range at current number
int end = nums.back();Mark end of last range after loop
return ranges;Return vector of ranges
function summaryRanges(nums) {
    if (nums.length === 0) return [];
    const ranges = [];
    let start = nums[0];
    for (let i = 1; i < nums.length; i++) {
        if (nums[i] !== nums[i - 1] + 1) {
            const end = nums[i - 1];
            if (start === end) {
                ranges.push(start.toString());
            } else {
                ranges.push(`${start}->${end}`);
            }
            start = nums[i];
        }
    }
    const end = nums[nums.length - 1];
    if (start === end) {
        ranges.push(start.toString());
    } else {
        ranges.push(`${start}->${end}`);
    }
    return ranges;
}

// Example usage
console.log(summaryRanges([0,1,2,4,5,7])); // ['0->2', '4->5', '7']
Line Notes
if (nums.length === 0) return [];Handle empty input to avoid errors
const ranges = [];Initialize array to hold range strings
let start = nums[0];Set start of first range
for (let i = 1; i < nums.length; i++) {Iterate from second element
if (nums[i] !== nums[i - 1] + 1) {Detect break in consecutive sequence
const end = nums[i - 1];Mark end of current range
if (start === end) {Check if single number range
ranges.push(start.toString());Add single number as string
ranges.push(`${start}->${end}`);Add range string for multiple numbers
start = nums[i];Start new range at current number
const end = nums[nums.length - 1];Mark end of last range after loop
return ranges;Return array of ranges
⏱
Complexity
TimeO(n)
SpaceO(n)

Single pass through the array, constant work per element, plus output storage.

💡 For n=1000, this means roughly 1000 operations, which is efficient for large inputs.
Interview Verdict: Accepted and efficient

This is the standard approach to implement in interviews for this problem.

🧠
Using Two Pointers
💡 Two pointers explicitly track the start and end indices of consecutive ranges, making the logic clear and easy to extend.

Intuition

Use one pointer to mark the start of a range and another to move forward until the sequence breaks, then record the range and move the start pointer.

Algorithm

  1. Initialize two pointers, start and end, both at 0.
  2. Move end forward while numbers are consecutive.
  3. When a break is found, record the range from start to end.
  4. Set start to end + 1 and repeat until the array is fully processed.
💡 Two pointers help visualize and implement the range detection cleanly and efficiently.
</>
Code
from typing import List

def summaryRanges(nums: List[int]) -> List[str]:
    ranges = []
    n = len(nums)
    start = 0
    while start < n:
        end = start
        while end + 1 < n and nums[end + 1] == nums[end] + 1:
            end += 1
        if start == end:
            ranges.append(str(nums[start]))
        else:
            ranges.append(f"{nums[start]}->{nums[end]}")
        start = end + 1
    return ranges

# Example usage
if __name__ == "__main__":
    print(summaryRanges([0,1,2,4,5,7]))  # ['0->2', '4->5', '7']
Line Notes
ranges = []Initialize list to store ranges
n = len(nums)Store length of input array
start = 0Initialize start pointer at beginning
while start < n:Process until all elements covered
end = startInitialize end pointer to start
while end + 1 < n and nums[end + 1] == nums[end] + 1:Move end pointer forward while consecutive
end += 1Advance end pointer
if start == end:Check if range is a single element
ranges.append(str(nums[start]))Add single number range
ranges.append(f"{nums[start]}->{nums[end]}")Add multi-number range
start = end + 1Move start pointer past current range
return rangesReturn list of range strings
import java.util.*;

public class SummaryRanges {
    public static List<String> summaryRanges(int[] nums) {
        List<String> ranges = new ArrayList<>();
        int n = nums.length;
        int start = 0;
        while (start < n) {
            int end = start;
            while (end + 1 < n && nums[end + 1] == nums[end] + 1) {
                end++;
            }
            if (start == end) {
                ranges.add(String.valueOf(nums[start]));
            } else {
                ranges.add(nums[start] + "->" + nums[end]);
            }
            start = end + 1;
        }
        return ranges;
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        int[] nums = {0,1,2,4,5,7};
        System.out.println(summaryRanges(nums)); // ["0->2", "4->5", "7"]
    }
}
Line Notes
List<String> ranges = new ArrayList<>();Create list for output
int n = nums.length;Store length of input array
int start = 0;Initialize start pointer
while (start < n) {Loop until all elements processed
int end = start;Initialize end pointer to start
while (end + 1 < n && nums[end + 1] == nums[end] + 1) {Move end pointer forward while consecutive
end++;Advance end pointer
if (start == end) {Check if single element range
ranges.add(String.valueOf(nums[start]));Add single number range
ranges.add(nums[start] + "->" + nums[end]);Add multi-number range
start = end + 1;Move start pointer past current range
return ranges;Return list of ranges
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <string>

using namespace std;

vector<string> summaryRanges(vector<int>& nums) {
    vector<string> ranges;
    int n = nums.size();
    int start = 0;
    while (start < n) {
        int end = start;
        while (end + 1 < n && nums[end + 1] == nums[end] + 1) {
            end++;
        }
        if (start == end) {
            ranges.push_back(to_string(nums[start]));
        } else {
            ranges.push_back(to_string(nums[start]) + "->" + to_string(nums[end]));
        }
        start = end + 1;
    }
    return ranges;
}

int main() {
    vector<int> nums = {0,1,2,4,5,7};
    vector<string> res = summaryRanges(nums);
    for (auto &s : res) cout << s << " ";
    cout << endl;
    return 0;
}
Line Notes
vector<string> ranges;Initialize vector to store ranges
int n = nums.size();Get size of input vector
int start = 0;Initialize start pointer
while (start < n) {Loop over array until all elements processed
int end = start;Initialize end pointer to start
while (end + 1 < n && nums[end + 1] == nums[end] + 1) {Advance end pointer while consecutive
end++;Move end pointer forward
if (start == end) {Check if single element range
ranges.push_back(to_string(nums[start]));Add single number range
ranges.push_back(to_string(nums[start]) + "->" + to_string(nums[end]));Add multi-number range
start = end + 1;Move start pointer past current range
return ranges;Return vector of ranges
function summaryRanges(nums) {
    const ranges = [];
    let start = 0;
    const n = nums.length;
    while (start < n) {
        let end = start;
        while (end + 1 < n && nums[end + 1] === nums[end] + 1) {
            end++;
        }
        if (start === end) {
            ranges.push(nums[start].toString());
        } else {
            ranges.push(`${nums[start]}->${nums[end]}`);
        }
        start = end + 1;
    }
    return ranges;
}

// Example usage
console.log(summaryRanges([0,1,2,4,5,7])); // ['0->2', '4->5', '7']
Line Notes
const ranges = [];Initialize output array
let start = 0;Start pointer initialization
const n = nums.length;Store length of input array
while (start < n) {Process all elements
let end = start;Initialize end pointer to start
while (end + 1 < n && nums[end + 1] === nums[end] + 1) {Advance end pointer while consecutive
end++;Move end pointer forward
if (start === end) {Check for single element range
ranges.push(nums[start].toString());Add single number range
ranges.push(`${nums[start]}->${nums[end]}`);Add multi-number range
start = end + 1;Move start pointer past current range
return ranges;Return array of ranges
⏱
Complexity
TimeO(n)
SpaceO(n)

Two pointers traverse the array once, each element visited at most twice.

💡 For n=1000, this means about 2000 operations, still very efficient.
Interview Verdict: Accepted and efficient

Two pointers is a clean and intuitive approach, often preferred for clarity.

📊
All Approaches - One-Glance Tradeoffs
💡 The single pass linear scan (Approach 2) is the best balance of simplicity and efficiency and should be coded in most interviews.
ApproachTimeSpaceStack RiskReconstructUse In Interview
1. Brute ForceO(n)O(n)NoN/AMention only - never code
2. Single Pass Linear ScanO(n)O(n)NoN/ACode this approach
3. Two PointersO(n)O(n)NoN/AOptional alternative for clarity
💼
Interview Strategy
💡 Use this guide to understand the problem deeply, practice coding the standard linear scan approach, and prepare to explain your reasoning clearly.

How to Present

Step 1: Clarify input constraints and confirm sorted unique array.Step 2: Describe brute force approach with nested loops to find consecutive ranges.Step 3: Optimize to single pass linear scan tracking start and end of ranges.Step 4: Optionally mention two pointers for clarity.Step 5: Code the linear scan approach carefully handling edge cases.Step 6: Test with examples and edge cases.

Time Allocation

Clarify: 2min → Approach: 3min → Code: 10min → Test: 5min. Total ~20min

What the Interviewer Tests

Interviewer tests your ability to track sequences, handle edge cases, and optimize from brute force to linear time.

Common Follow-ups

  • What if the array is not sorted? → Sort first or use a set and find consecutive sequences.
  • How to handle duplicates? → Skip duplicates or preprocess to unique elements.
  • Can you do this in O(n) without sorting? → Use a hash set and check neighbors.
  • How to output ranges in reverse order? → Collect ranges then reverse the list.
💡 These follow-ups test your understanding of input assumptions and ability to adapt the solution.
🔍
Pattern Recognition

When to Use

1) Input is a sorted list of unique integers, 2) Need to find consecutive sequences, 3) Output summary ranges, 4) Efficient linear time required

Signature Phrases

smallest sorted list of rangesconsecutive numberscover all the numbers exactly

NOT This Pattern When

Problems that require dynamic programming or complex interval trees are different despite involving ranges.

Similar Problems

Merge Intervals - also about merging overlapping or consecutive rangesMissing Ranges - finding gaps between numbersLongest Consecutive Sequence - detecting longest run of consecutive numbers

Practice

(1/5)
1. The following code attempts to check if an array can be paired such that sums are divisible by k. Which line contains a subtle bug that causes incorrect results on some inputs?
def canArrange(nums, k):
    if len(nums) % 2 != 0:
        return True
    freq = {}
    for num in nums:
        r = ((num % k) + k) % k
        freq[r] = freq.get(r, 0) + 1
    if freq.get(0, 0) % 2 != 0:
        return False
    for r in freq:
        if r != 0:
            complement = (k - r) % k
            if freq.get(r, 0) != freq.get(complement, 0):
                return False
    if k % 2 == 0 and freq.get(k // 2, 0) % 2 != 0:
        return False
    return True
medium
A. Line 5: computing remainder without adjusting for negative numbers
B. Line 2: returning True when array length is odd
C. Line 8: checking if freq[0] count is even
D. Line 13: checking if freq[k//2] count is even when k is even

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check array length condition

    The code returns True if the array length is odd, but pairing requires even length. This causes incorrect True on odd-length arrays.
  2. Step 2: Verify other lines

    Remainder calculation correctly adjusts for negative numbers. Other checks for freq[0] and freq[k//2] are correct.
  3. Final Answer:

    Option B -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Odd length arrays cannot be fully paired, so returning True is a bug [OK]
Hint: Array length must be even to form pairs [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Returning True on odd length arrays
  • Not adjusting modulo for negative numbers
  • Ignoring freq[0] or freq[k/2] parity checks
2. The following code attempts to find all anagrams of p in s using the sliding window approach. Identify the line that contains a subtle bug causing incorrect results on some inputs.
medium
A. Missing matches adjustment after decreasing s_count[index_l]
B. Line updating s_count[index_l] after removing left char
C. Line appending index l to result when matches == 26
D. Line updating s_count[index_r] and matches after adding right char

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify where matches count is updated

    Matches are updated correctly when adding the right character but not when removing the left character.
  2. Step 2: Locate missing matches adjustment

    After decreasing s_count[index_l], matches should be updated if counts now match or mismatch, but this is missing, causing incorrect results.
  3. Final Answer:

    Option A -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Bug causes false negatives on some inputs due to stale matches count [OK]
Hint: Check matches update after both add and remove steps [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Forgetting to update matches after removing left char
  • Updating matches twice incorrectly
  • Off-by-one in window boundaries
3. What is the time complexity of the optimal sliding window solution for finding the longest substring with at most two distinct characters, assuming the input string length is n?
medium
A. O(n²), because the inner while loop can run up to n times for each character.
B. O(n * k), where k is the number of distinct characters allowed (here k=2).
C. O(n log n), due to maintaining a balanced data structure for frequencies.
D. O(n), because each character is visited at most twice by the left and right pointers.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze outer and inner loops

    The right pointer moves from 0 to n-1 once. The left pointer only moves forward when distinct_count > 2, also at most n times.
  2. Step 2: Confirm total operations

    Each character is processed at most twice (once when right pointer visits, once when left pointer moves), so total operations are O(n).
  3. Final Answer:

    Option D -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Sliding window with two pointers is classic O(n) approach [OK]
Hint: Two pointers each move at most n times [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming nested loops multiply to O(n²)
  • Confusing frequency map maintenance cost
  • Thinking k affects complexity linearly
4. What is the time complexity of the optimal sliding window solution for the Minimum Operations to Reduce X to Zero problem, assuming the input array length is n?
medium
A. O(n^2) due to nested loops for adjusting window boundaries.
B. O(n) for the main loop plus O(n) for sum computations inside the loop.
C. O(n) because each element is visited at most twice by left and right pointers.
D. O(n log n) due to sorting or binary search steps.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze the main loop and window adjustments

    The right pointer moves from 0 to n-1 once, and the left pointer only moves forward when shrinking the window, so each element is visited at most twice.
  2. Step 2: Confirm no nested loops causing quadratic time

    While loop inside the for loop advances left pointer without resetting, so total moves of left pointer ≤ n.
  3. Final Answer:

    Option C -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Two-pointer sliding window runs in linear time [OK]
Hint: Sliding window moves pointers linearly [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming nested loops cause O(n^2)
  • Forgetting that left pointer only moves forward
  • Confusing sum computations as extra loops
5. Suppose the problem is modified so that elements can be removed multiple times (i.e., you can reuse elements from the ends infinitely) to reduce x to zero. Which approach correctly adapts to this variant?
hard
A. Use a dynamic programming approach to find the minimum number of removals with unlimited reuse, similar to coin change.
B. Apply a greedy approach removing the largest elements repeatedly from ends until x is zero.
C. Use the same sliding window approach on the original array once; it still works without changes.
D. Use prefix and suffix sums with a hash map but ignore overlapping since reuse is allowed.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the reuse variant

    Since elements can be reused infinitely, the problem becomes similar to coin change where you want minimum coins (elements) summing to x.
  2. Step 2: Recognize sliding window limitation

    Sliding window relies on contiguous subarrays without reuse; it cannot handle infinite reuse.
  3. Step 3: Use DP approach

    Dynamic programming can find minimum removals with unlimited reuse by building solutions for all sums up to x.
  4. Final Answer:

    Option A -> Option A
  5. Quick Check:

    DP handles reuse, sliding window does not [OK]
Hint: Reuse implies DP coin change pattern [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming sliding window works with reuse
  • Ignoring infinite reuse changes problem nature
  • Using greedy which fails on some sums
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard