Practice
s and t. The task is to find the smallest substring in s that contains all characters of t including duplicates. Which algorithmic approach guarantees an optimal solution in terms of time complexity?Solution
Step 1: Understand problem constraints
The problem requires finding the minimum window substring containing all characters oft, including duplicates, which suggests tracking frequencies.Step 2: Identify suitable algorithm
Brute force is correct but inefficient (O(n^3)). DP is not suitable as substring problems with character counts are not naturally solved by DP. Greedy stopping early can miss smaller windows. Sliding window with frequency maps efficiently tracks counts and adjusts window size, guaranteeing optimal O(n) time.Final Answer:
Option A -> Option AQuick Check:
Sliding window with frequency maps is the classic optimal approach [OK]
- Assuming greedy expansion alone suffices
- Thinking DP solves substring frequency problems efficiently
left and right. You need to count the number of contiguous subarrays where the maximum element lies between left and right inclusive. Which approach guarantees an optimal solution with linear time complexity?Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem constraints
The problem requires counting subarrays with maximum elements bounded between left and right, which can be done efficiently by counting subarrays with max ≤ right and subtracting those with max < left.Step 2: Identify the optimal approach
The approach that counts subarrays with max ≤ right and subtracts those with max < left uses a single linear pass and constant space, guaranteeing O(n) time complexity.Final Answer:
Option D -> Option DQuick Check:
Optimal linear approach uses subtraction of two counts [OK]
- Assuming sliding window can track max efficiently
- Trying to sort and binary search subarrays
- Using brute force for optimal solution
max_length after processing the input [0, 1, 0, 1]?Solution
Step 1: Trace prefix sums and first_occurrence updates.
For input [0,1,0,1], prefix sums are: -1, 0, -1, 0 with offset indexing.Step 2: Update max_length when prefix sum repeats.
At i=1, prefix_sum=0 repeats at index -1 -> length=2; at i=3, prefix_sum=0 repeats again -> length=4.Final Answer:
Option B -> Option BQuick Check:
Longest balanced subarray is entire array length 4 [OK]
- Off-by-one in length calculation
- Confusing prefix sum indexing
- Ignoring initial prefix sum at -1
Solution
Step 1: Understand remainder_map update timing
The original code updated remainder_map[running_sum] = i before checking if running_sum already exists, overwriting the earliest index.Step 2: Identify consequence of overwriting
Overwriting earliest index causes missing longer subarrays that satisfy the condition, leading to false negatives.Step 3: Correct the code
Update remainder_map[running_sum] = i only if running_sum is not already in remainder_map, preserving earliest occurrence.Final Answer:
Option A -> Option AQuick Check:
Correct code inserts remainder only if not present to preserve earliest index [OK]
- Updating remainder map on every occurrence
- Not checking subarray length >= 2
- Modulo by zero errors
Solution
Step 1: Understand the requirement
We need all pivot indices, not just the first.Step 2: Modify the single-pass approach
Instead of returning immediately when a pivot is found, collect the index and continue iterating.Step 3: Avoid sorting or extra loops
Sorting breaks the order and two loops increase complexity unnecessarily.Final Answer:
Option B -> Option BQuick Check:
Collecting all valid indices in one pass is efficient and correct [OK]
- Returning early and missing other pivots
- Using sorting which breaks index order
- Using nested loops increasing complexity
