Bird
Raised Fist0

In the following pseudocode for adding a number to intervals, which step is likely to cause incorrect merging when the number is already inside an existing interval?

medium🐞 Bug Q7 of Q15
Intervals - Data Stream as Disjoint Intervals
In the following pseudocode for adding a number to intervals, which step is likely to cause incorrect merging when the number is already inside an existing interval?
1. Find position to insert number
2. Check if number is adjacent to previous interval
3. Check if number is adjacent to next interval
4. Insert number as new interval if no adjacency found
AStep 1: Finding position to insert
BStep 4: Inserting new interval without checking coverage
CStep 3: Checking adjacency with next interval
DStep 2: Checking adjacency with previous interval
Step-by-Step Solution
Solution:
  1. Step 1: Understand the problem

    If the number is already covered, no new interval should be inserted.
  2. Step 2: Analyze step 4

    Inserting a new interval without verifying coverage causes duplicates.
  3. Step 3: Other steps

    Steps 1-3 are for locating and merging, not inserting blindly.
  4. Final Answer:

    Option B -> Option B
  5. Quick Check:

    Always verify coverage before inserting new interval [OK]
Quick Trick: Never insert new interval without coverage check [OK]
Common Mistakes:
MISTAKES
  • Inserting new interval even if number is inside existing interval
  • Skipping coverage check leads to overlapping intervals
Trap Explanation:
PITFALL
  • Inserting without coverage check looks correct but causes duplicates.
Interviewer Note:
CONTEXT
  • Tests debugging skills and understanding of interval coverage.
Master "Data Stream as Disjoint Intervals" in Intervals

3 interactive learning modes - each teaches the same concept differently

Want More Practice?

15+ quiz questions · All difficulty levels · Free

Free Signup - Practice All Questions
More Intervals Quizzes