Practice
delete_n_after_m_optimized(head, 1, 1)?Solution
Step 1: Trace skipping M=1 node
Starting at node 1, skip 1 node means stay at node 1 (loop runs zero times).Step 2: Delete N=1 node after current
Delete node after 1, which is node 2. So, link node 1's next to node 3.Final Answer:
Option A -> Option AQuick Check:
Resulting list is 1 -> 3 -> 4 after deletion [OK]
- Off-by-one in skipping nodes
- Deleting wrong nodes after skipping
- Misunderstanding loop ranges
hasCycle(node1)?Solution
Step 1: Trace the traversal and marking of nodes
Start at node1 (visited=false), mark visited=true, move to node2. Repeat for node2 and node3. When reaching node4, mark visited=true and move to node2 again, which is already visited.Step 2: Detect cycle when revisiting node2
Since node2.visited is true, the function returns true indicating a cycle.Final Answer:
Option A -> Option AQuick Check:
Cycle detected correctly by visited flag [OK]
- Assuming no cycle due to missing pointer update
- Confusing return values
Solution
Step 1: Identify outer loop and inner pointer movements
The outer loop runs n times, but elements are marked zero once visited, preventing reprocessing.Step 2: Analyze pointer visits
Each element is visited at most once in the inner while loop due to zero marking, so total work is O(n).Final Answer:
Option C -> Option CQuick Check:
Marking visited elements ensures linear time complexity [OK]
- Assuming repeated visits cause O(n^2)
- Confusing modulo cost as log factor
- Believing overlapping cycles increase complexity
Solution
Step 1: Identify time complexity
Fast pointer moves two steps per iteration, slow moves one; total iterations proportional to n -> O(n) time.Step 2: Identify space complexity
Only two pointers used, no extra data structures -> O(1) space.Final Answer:
Option A -> Option AQuick Check:
Linear time and constant space for two-pointer traversal [OK]
- Confusing space with O(n) due to recursion
- Assuming nested loops cause O(n^2)
- Thinking fast pointer halves complexity to O(log n)
Solution
Step 1: Identify data structures used
The stack stores every node in the list, so it holds n nodes.Step 2: Determine space complexity
Storing all n nodes means O(n) auxiliary space is required.Step 3: Re-examine options
O(n) because all nodes are stored in the stack states O(n) space which is correct for stack-based approach. O(1) because only a few pointers are used states O(1) which is incorrect for stack-based approach.Final Answer:
Option A -> Option AQuick Check:
Stack size grows linearly with list length [OK]
- Assuming constant space due to pointers
- Confusing recursion stack with iterative stack
- Thinking divide and conquer applies here
