Bird
Raised Fist0

What is the auxiliary space complexity of the recursive approach to count set bits using Brian Kernighan's method?

medium🪤 Complexity Trap Q6 of Q15
Bit Manipulation - Number of 1 Bits (Hamming Weight)
What is the auxiliary space complexity of the recursive approach to count set bits using Brian Kernighan's method?
AO(1) constant space since no extra data structures are used
BO(k) where k is the number of set bits due to recursion stack
CO(log n) due to recursion depth on input size
DO(n) proportional to total bits in the integer
Step-by-Step Solution
Solution:
  1. Step 1: Consider recursion depth

    Each recursive call clears one set bit, so recursion depth is k (number of set bits).
  2. Step 2: Relate k to space complexity

    Auxiliary space is proportional to recursion depth, so O(k).
  3. Final Answer:

    Option B -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Recursion stack grows with number of set bits [OK]
Quick Trick: Recursion stack size equals number of set bits [OK]
Common Mistakes:
MISTAKES
  • Forgetting recursion stack space
  • Assuming constant space for recursion
Trap Explanation:
PITFALL
  • Candidates often ignore recursion stack space, assuming iterative and recursive use same space.
Interviewer Note:
CONTEXT
  • Tests understanding of space complexity in recursive bit manipulation.
Master "Number of 1 Bits (Hamming Weight)" in Bit Manipulation

3 interactive learning modes - each teaches the same concept differently

Want More Practice?

15+ quiz questions · All difficulty levels · Free

Free Signup - Practice All Questions
More Bit Manipulation Quizzes