Bird
Raised Fist0
Amazon Leadership Principles

Tell Me About a Time You Had to Choose Between Two Competing Valid Approaches - Bar Raiser Evaluate

Choose your preparation mode3 modes available
Evaluate These Two Answers
"Tell me about a time when you identified a problem that no one else had noticed and took action to fix it."
SDE 23 minAmazon Bar Raiser. LP evaluated explicitly. Content scored, not delivery.
Score BOTH answers on Ownership Signal, Action Specificity, and Quantified Impact BEFORE applying the full rubric.
If you scored Candidate A >40 total, your calibration is biased toward fluency. Bar Raisers ignore delivery and score content only.
Candidate A

During a sprint, I noticed a data inconsistency issue affecting reports in the payment module that no one else had identified. I independently analyzed the data and collaborated with the team to pinpoint the root cause. I then deployed a fix that improved report accuracy by 15%, reducing customer complaints by 20% within two weeks. Although it was a team effort, I took primary responsibility for the investigation and resolution.

Fluent delivery, confident tone - most untrained evaluators score this high
Candidate B

While reviewing system logs, I noticed an unusual spike in error rates that no one had reported or filed a ticket for. I independently investigated the issue by analyzing recent code changes and running targeted tests. I weighed trade-offs between rolling back and patching, choosing to deploy a hotfix that mitigated risk without downtime. This reduced errors by 40%, improving customer experience and preventing potential revenue loss estimated at $10K weekly. I documented the root cause and shared learnings with the team to prevent recurrence.

35-55 seconds longer - every extra second is signal-dense content
📊
Score Comparison
Dimension
Weight
Candidate A
Candidate B
structure star
15%
12
14
ownership signal
30%
1
28
action specificity
25%
8
24
quantified impact
20%
4
19
self awareness
10%
0
10
Total
25 No Hire
88 Strong Hire
AUTO-FAIL: my manager suggested I look into this since I had bandwidth - assigned task. Score 1. No Hire.
🚨
Auto-Fail Markers
Manager-directed task assignment
"Candidate A - my manager suggested I look into this since I had bandwidth"
Ownership requires self-initiation. Manager-assigned = execution. Score 1 on ownership_signal (weight=30) = No Hire always.
Collective language hiding individual contribution
"Candidate A - we found a data inconsistency issue"
Using 'we' without clarifying individual role obscures ownership. Score 1 on ownership_signal (weight=30) = No Hire always.
📝
Bar Raiser Notes
Ownership weak - manager-directed; collective language obscures individual contribution; zero quantification of impact; no clear risk mitigation; No Hire.
🔧
Fix-It Challenge
Ownership clarity
Before"my manager suggested I look into this since I had bandwidth"
After"I noticed the issue during a routine review with no ticket filed and nobody asked me to investigate; I decided to act proactively because..."
Demonstrates self-initiation and ownership rather than manager assignment.
Individual contribution specificity
Before"we found a data inconsistency issue"
After"I discovered a data inconsistency issue during my analysis"
Highlights personal ownership and responsibility rather than vague team effort.
Quantify impact
Before"improved report accuracy and reduced customer complaints"
After"improved report accuracy by 15%, reducing customer complaints by 20% within two weeks"
Adds measurable impact to demonstrate effectiveness and business value.
🎓
Coaching Notes
  • At Amazon, Are Right a Lot means demonstrating strong judgment by weighing trade-offs with data, mitigating risks, and quantifying impact clearly.
  • Avoid phrases that imply manager direction such as 'my manager suggested' because ownership requires self-initiation.
  • Use precise individual language rather than collective 'we' to highlight your personal contribution.
  • Quantify the impact of your actions with metrics and business outcomes to show the scale of your decision-making.
  • Explicitly describe how you evaluated options and mitigated risks to show sound judgment and bias for action.
Model Answer Guidance

A strong answer for Are Right a Lot at Amazon includes a clear example where the candidate independently identified a problem without prompting, analyzed data to weigh trade-offs, chose a risk-mitigated solution, and quantified the impact with metrics and business results. The candidate should use first-person language to demonstrate ownership and explain their reasoning process explicitly.