Practice
def get_candidates(r, c):
b = (r//3)*3 + c//3
return [ch for ch in '123456789' if ch not in rows[r] and ch not in cols[c] and ch not in boxes[b]]
empties.sort(key=lambda x: len(get_candidates(x[0], x[1])))
first_empty = empties[0]
candidates_len = len(get_candidates(first_empty[0], first_empty[1]))
What is the value of candidates_len?Solution
Step 1: Identify first empty cell after sorting
Check empties and compute candidates for each; the cell with fewest candidates is chosen first.Step 2: Calculate candidates for first empty cell (0,2)
Row 0 has {'5','3','7'}, column 2 has {'8'}, box 0 has {'5','3','6','9','8'}. Candidates are digits not in any of these sets: '1','2','4'. So length is 3.Final Answer:
Option B -> Option BQuick Check:
Counting candidates for (0,2) yields 3 [OK]
- Forgetting box constraints
- Miscounting candidates for first empty cell
def backtrack():
if not empties:
return True
empties.sort(key=lambda x: len(get_candidates(x[0], x[1])))
r, c = empties[0]
for ch in get_candidates(r, c):
board[r][c] = ch
rows[r].add(ch)
cols[c].add(ch)
boxes[(r//3)*3 + c//3].add(ch)
empties.pop(0)
if backtrack():
return True
# Undo changes
board[r][c] = '.'
rows[r].remove(ch)
cols[c].remove(ch)
boxes[(r//3)*3 + c//3].remove(ch)
empties.insert(0, (r, c))
return False
Solution
Step 1: Identify mutation of empties list
The line popping empties[0] removes the cell but is never restored on backtrack failure.Step 2: Consequence of missing restoration
Without re-adding the cell to empties after failed recursion, future calls miss this cell, causing incorrect state and solutions.Final Answer:
Option A -> Option AQuick Check:
Backtracking requires undoing all changes including empties list [OK]
- Forgetting to restore empties after pop
- Assuming board reset is sufficient
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem variant
Allowing repeated use of elements means permutations with repetition, which standard next permutation does not handle as it assumes fixed elements.Step 2: Identify correct approach
Backtracking that generates permutations with repetition is required, as in-place next permutation only rearranges existing elements without reuse.Final Answer:
Option D -> Option DQuick Check:
Standard next permutation assumes fixed elements; repeated reuse requires backtracking [OK]
- Thinking standard algorithm handles reuse
- Trying to modify pivot logic only
Solution
Step 1: Understand repetition impact
Allowing reuse breaks the factorial number system assumption because permutations count changes drastically.Step 2: Identify correct approach
Backtracking with early stop can generate permutations with repetition and find the k-th one, as direct factorial indexing is invalid.Final Answer:
Option D -> Option DQuick Check:
Factorial indexing fails with repetition; backtracking is correct fallback [OK]
- Trying to reuse factorial indexing without adjustment
- Ignoring repetition changes permutation count
- Assuming greedy works for k-th permutation with repetition
Solution
Step 1: Understand reuse of parentheses
Allowing reuse means we can insert parentheses anywhere, greatly increasing state space and complexity.Step 2: Analyze BFS suitability
Standard BFS only removes characters; it does not handle insertions, so it cannot explore all states correctly.Step 3: Identify correct approach
Backtracking with memoization can explicitly explore insertions and removals, pruning invalid states to handle reuse properly.Final Answer:
Option A -> Option AQuick Check:
Backtracking with memoization handles insertions and pruning [OK]
- Assuming BFS handles insertions
- Using greedy for complex insertions
- Modifying BFS without pruning leads to explosion
