Introduction
Relationship Comparison questions require you to examine two or more relationship statements and decide whether they describe the same relation, different relations, or if the relation cannot be conclusively determined.
This pattern is important because many tests present equivalent statements differently - mastering comparison saves time and prevents errors from reversed perspective or omitted gender clues.
Pattern: Relationship Comparison
Pattern
Key concept: Build each relationship independently, normalize the direction (who → whom), and then compare the resulting links for equivalence.
Common checks:
- Is the direction reversed? (A → B vs B → A)
- Are genders specified or implied?
- Is there a generation shift (parent vs child)?
- Does a neutral term (sibling/child/parent) exist that removes ambiguity?
Step-by-Step Example
Question
Statement 1: A is the brother of B.
Statement 2: B is the sister of A.
Which is correct?
(A) Same relationship (B) Different relationship (C) Opposite relationship (D) Cannot be determined
Solution
-
Step 1: Decode Statement 1.
A is brother of B → A and B are siblings; A is male. -
Step 2: Decode Statement 2.
B is sister of A → B and A are siblings; B is female. -
Step 3: Normalize and compare.
Both statements assert a sibling relationship between A and B (just state genders explicitly). The underlying connection (sibling) is identical. -
Final Answer:
Same relationship → Option A. -
Quick Check:
Both say “A and B are siblings” (gender words differ but do not change relation) ✅
Quick Variations
1. Direction swap: “A is father of B” vs “B is son of A” → Same relationship if genders/generation match.
2. Gender ambiguity: “A is the brother of B” vs “B is sibling of A” → Same relationship (use neutral term).
3. Generation trap: “A is the cousin of B” vs “B is uncle of A” → Different (cousin vs uncle).
4. In-law vs blood: “A is sister-in-law of B” vs “B is sister of A” → Different (marital vs blood).
Trick to Always Use
- Step 1 → Convert each statement to a simple arrow form: Person → Relation → Person (e.g., A → brother → B).
- Step 2 → Rewrite reversed forms so both read from the same left→right direction before comparing.
- Step 3 → Replace gendered words with neutral ones when checking equivalence (brother/sister → sibling) if options include neutral terms.
- Step 4 → If ambiguity remains (missing gender/generation), choose “Cannot be determined” rather than guessing.
Summary
Summary
Key takeaways:
- Always parse each statement independently, normalize direction, then compare.
- Watch for generation changes - parent ↔ child means different relations.
- Prefer neutral terms or DNT when gender/generation is ambiguous.
- Quick normalization (arrow form) is the fastest way to check equivalence under exam time pressure.
