In a monolithic SCADA system, all components are tightly integrated into a single unit. What is the primary disadvantage of this design?
Think about how tightly connected parts affect changes and growth.
Monolithic SCADA systems bundle all functions together, making it difficult to update or scale parts independently. This tight coupling increases maintenance complexity.
Given a monolithic SCADA system, the command scada_status --all is run. What output would you expect?
scada_status --all
Monolithic means all parts are together, so status commands usually cover everything at once.
The command reports the status of all components since they are integrated in one system, producing a unified status report.
A monolithic SCADA system suddenly stops responding. Which step is the best initial troubleshooting action?
Remember that in monolithic systems, components are tightly coupled.
Because components are tightly integrated, restarting the whole system is often necessary to recover from failures.
What is the correct workflow to deploy a software update in a monolithic SCADA system?
Consider the risks of updating tightly coupled components.
Because all components are integrated, updates require full system backup and downtime to ensure stability and recovery options.
Which approach best improves scalability in a monolithic SCADA system without redesigning it completely?
Think about ways to handle more work without changing the software structure.
Adding redundant hardware and load balancing helps distribute workload and improve scalability without changing the monolithic design.