Preempting actions in ROS - Performance & Optimization

Performance: Preempting actions

MEDIUM IMPACT

Preempting actions affects how quickly a robot can respond to new commands by interrupting ongoing tasks, impacting interaction responsiveness.

Handling new commands while a robot is executing a long action

ROS

if action_client.is_active():
    action_client.cancel_goal()
action_client.send_goal(new_goal)
# Use preempt to cancel current goal if new one arrives

Allows interrupting ongoing actions to start new ones immediately, improving responsiveness.

📈 Performance GainReduces input delay, lowers INP metric, improves user experience

Handling new commands while a robot is executing a long action

ROS

action_client.send_goal(goal)
# Waits for current action to finish before accepting new goals
# No preemption logic implemented

Robot waits for current action to complete, causing input lag and poor responsiveness.

📉 Performance CostBlocks interaction until action finishes, increasing INP and user frustration

Performance Comparison

Pattern	CPU Usage	Response Delay	User Experience	Verdict
No preemption	Low during action	High (waits for completion)	Poor responsiveness	[X] Bad
Preempting actions	Moderate (due to cancelling overhead)	Low (immediate switch)	Good responsiveness	[OK] Good

Rendering Pipeline

Preempting actions affects the robot's control loop responsiveness by interrupting ongoing tasks and scheduling new ones immediately.

→Task Scheduling

→CPU Processing

→Communication Latency

⚠️ BottleneckTask Scheduling and CPU Processing when cancelling and restarting actions

Core Web Vital Affected

INP

Preempting actions affects how quickly a robot can respond to new commands by interrupting ongoing tasks, impacting interaction responsiveness.

Optimization Tips

1Use preempting actions to reduce input delay and improve responsiveness.

2Avoid excessive preemption to prevent high CPU overhead.

3Monitor action cancel and start times to optimize task switching.

Performance Quiz - 3 Questions

What is the main performance benefit of preempting actions in ROS?

A Increases action completion time for reliability

B Reduces CPU usage by avoiding task cancellation

C Improves responsiveness by allowing immediate task switching

D Eliminates network latency completely

DevTools: ros2_tracing or rqt_console

How to check: Use tracing tools to measure action cancel and start times; check logs for delays in action switching.

What to look for: Look for reduced latency between cancel and new action start; absence of long blocking periods.

Practice

1.

What does cancel_goal() do in ROS action clients?

easy

A. It requests to stop the currently running action goal.

B. It starts a new action goal immediately.

C. It pauses the action without stopping it.

D. It resets the action server to its initial state.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the purpose of cancel_goal()

   This function is used to request the cancellation of the current goal being processed by the action server.

2. Step 2: Differentiate from other actions

   Starting a new goal or pausing are different operations; cancel_goal() specifically requests stopping the current goal.

3. Final Answer:

   It requests to stop the currently running action goal. -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   cancel_goal() stops current goal [OK]

Hint: Remember: cancel_goal() means stop current action [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing cancel_goal() with starting a new goal
• Thinking cancel_goal() pauses instead of cancels
• Assuming cancel_goal() resets the server

2.

Which of the following is the correct sequence to preempt an action in ROS?

1. cancel_goal()
2. send_goal(new_goal)

easy

A. Call cancel_goal() first, then send_goal(new_goal).

B. Call send_goal(new_goal) first, then cancel_goal().

C. Call cancel_goal() twice, then send_goal(new_goal).

D. Only call send_goal(new_goal) without canceling.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand preempting order

   You must first cancel the current goal to stop it before sending a new goal to replace it.

2. Step 2: Confirm correct method calls

   Calling cancel_goal() first ensures the old task stops, then send_goal(new_goal) starts the new task.

3. Final Answer:

   Call cancel_goal() first, then send_goal(new_goal). -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Cancel before sending new goal [OK]

Hint: Cancel first, then send new goal to preempt [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Sending new goal before canceling old one
• Calling cancel_goal() multiple times unnecessarily
• Skipping cancel_goal() and sending new goal directly

3.

Given this ROS action client code snippet, what will be the output behavior?

client.send_goal(goal1)
client.cancel_goal()
client.send_goal(goal2)

What happens to goal1 and goal2?

medium

A. Neither goal runs because cancel_goal() stops all actions.

B. goal1 runs fully; goal2 is ignored.

C. Both goal1 and goal2 run simultaneously.

D. goal1 is canceled; goal2 starts running.

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze the cancel_goal() effect

   After sending goal1, cancel_goal() requests to stop it immediately.

2. Step 2: Understand sending goal2

   Sending goal2 after canceling goal1 starts the new action goal.

3. Final Answer:

   goal1 is canceled; goal2 starts running. -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Cancel old goal, start new goal [OK]

Hint: Cancel stops old goal; new send_goal starts new task [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Assuming goal1 runs fully despite cancel
• Thinking both goals run at once
• Believing cancel_goal() stops all future goals

4.

Identify the error in this ROS action client code snippet:

client.send_goal(goal1)
client.send_goal(goal2)
client.cancel_goal()

What is wrong with this sequence?

medium

A. The code should call cancel_goal() twice to cancel both goals.

B. You cannot send two goals without canceling the first one first.

C. Calling cancel_goal() after sending two goals does not preempt correctly.

D. There is no error; this sequence is correct.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand goal handling

   Sending two goals in a row without canceling means the second goal overrides the first immediately.

2. Step 2: Analyze cancel_goal() timing

   Calling cancel_goal() after both sends only cancels the currently active goal, not preempting properly between goals.

3. Final Answer:

   Calling cancel_goal() after sending two goals does not preempt correctly. -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Cancel before sending new goal to preempt [OK]

Hint: Cancel before sending next goal, not after [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Sending multiple goals without canceling first
• Assuming cancel_goal() cancels all previous goals
• Calling cancel_goal() too late to preempt

5.

You want to preempt a running action only if it has been active for more than 5 seconds. Which approach correctly implements this logic?

if client.get_state() == ACTIVE and client.get_time_active() > 5:
    client.cancel_goal()
    client.send_goal(new_goal)

hard

A. You must call cancel_goal() before checking the state.

B. This approach correctly preempts only after 5 seconds of activity.

C. You should send the new goal first, then cancel the old one.

D. ROS actions do not support checking active time for preemption.

Solution

1. Step 1: Check action state and duration

   The code checks if the action is active and has been running longer than 5 seconds.

2. Step 2: Cancel and send new goal conditionally

   Only if both conditions are true, it cancels the current goal and sends a new one, correctly preempting.

3. Final Answer:

   This approach correctly preempts only after 5 seconds of activity. -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Check state and time before canceling [OK]

Hint: Check active state and time before canceling [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Canceling without checking active time
• Sending new goal before canceling old one
• Assuming ROS lacks timing info for actions