Dashboard Mode - EMI reduction techniques
Goal
Understand which EMI reduction techniques are most effective in reducing electromagnetic interference in PCB designs.
Understand which EMI reduction techniques are most effective in reducing electromagnetic interference in PCB designs.
| Technique | Effectiveness Score (1-10) | Cost ($) | Implementation Time (hours) | Complexity Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ground Plane | 9 | 50 | 2 | Low |
| Shielding | 8 | 120 | 4 | Medium |
| Filtering | 7 | 80 | 3 | Medium |
| Twisted Pair Routing | 6 | 30 | 1 | Low |
| Component Placement | 7 | 40 | 2 | Low |
| Decoupling Capacitors | 8 | 60 | 2 | Low |
| Ferrite Beads | 5 | 25 | 1 | Low |
+----------------------+----------------------+ | Average Effectiveness| Total Cost | | Score (KPI) | (KPI) | +----------------------+----------------------+ | Bar Chart: Effectiveness Score by Technique | | | +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Pie Chart: Cost Distribution | Table: Techniques Sorted by Implementation Time | +-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
A filter for Complexity Level allows users to select Low, Medium, or all techniques. When filtered, all components update to show data only for selected complexity levels. For example, selecting 'Low' updates KPIs, charts, and table to reflect only low complexity techniques.
If you add a filter for Complexity Level = Low, which components update and what changes occur?