Readonly for immutable reactive data in Vue - Cheat Sheet & Quick Revision

Recall & Review

beginner

What does the readonly function do in Vue?

It creates a reactive object that cannot be changed. Any attempt to modify it will fail silently or warn in development mode.

beginner

Why use readonly instead of reactive in Vue?

Use readonly to protect data from accidental changes while still allowing Vue to track dependencies and update the UI.

intermediate

How does Vue behave if you try to modify a readonly reactive object?

Vue will not update the object and will warn you in the console during development to prevent accidental mutations.

intermediate

Can you nest readonly objects inside other reactive objects in Vue?

Yes, nested objects inside a readonly object are also made readonly recursively.

beginner

Give a simple example of creating a readonly reactive object in Vue.

Example:<br><pre>import { reactive, readonly } from 'vue';
const state = reactive({ count: 0 });
const readOnlyState = readonly(state);</pre><br>This makes <code>readOnlyState</code> immutable but reactive.

What happens if you try to change a property on a Vue readonly object?

A The change updates the object normally.

B The change is ignored and a warning appears in development mode.

C Vue throws a runtime error and crashes.

D The object becomes reactive and mutable.

Readonly objects prevent changes and warn you during development to avoid accidental mutations.

Which Vue function creates an immutable reactive object?

A computed()

B reactive()

C ref()

D readonly()

readonly() creates a reactive object that cannot be changed.

Can a readonly object still trigger UI updates in Vue?

A Only if you convert it back to reactive.

B No, it does not trigger updates.

C Yes, because it is reactive but immutable.

D Only if you use <code>ref()</code> with it.

Readonly objects are reactive, so Vue tracks dependencies and updates the UI when underlying data changes.

What is a common use case for readonly in Vue?

A To share state safely without allowing changes.

B To make data editable by the user.

C To create computed properties.

D To watch for changes manually.

readonly is used to share state that should not be changed by consumers.

If you have a nested object inside a readonly object, what happens to the nested object?

A It is also made readonly recursively.

B It remains mutable.

C It becomes reactive but writable.

D It is ignored by Vue's reactivity system.

Vue applies readonly recursively to nested objects to keep immutability consistent.

Explain how Vue's readonly function helps manage immutable reactive data.

Think about protecting data while keeping UI updates.

Describe a scenario where using readonly in Vue is better than using reactive.

Consider teamwork where some members only view data.

Practice

1. What does the readonly function do in Vue's reactivity system?

easy

A. It creates an immutable reactive object that cannot be changed directly.

B. It makes a reactive object completely non-reactive and static.

C. It clones the reactive object and allows changes only on the clone.

D. It converts a reactive object into a plain JavaScript object.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the purpose of readonly

   The readonly function wraps a reactive object to prevent direct modifications, making it immutable.

2. Step 2: Compare with other behaviors

   Unlike cloning or removing reactivity, readonly keeps the object reactive but disallows changes.

3. Final Answer:

   It creates an immutable reactive object that cannot be changed directly. -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Readonly = Immutable reactive object [OK]

Hint: Readonly means no direct changes allowed on reactive data [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking readonly removes reactivity completely
• Assuming readonly clones data instead of wrapping
• Believing readonly allows changes on the wrapped object

2. Which of the following is the correct way to create a readonly reactive object in Vue?

easy

A. const data = readonly({ count: 0 })

B. const data = readonly(reactive({ count: 0 }))

C. const data = reactive(readonly({ count: 0 }))

D. const data = reactive({ count: 0 }).readonly()

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the correct usage order

   You first create a reactive object, then wrap it with readonly to make it immutable.

2. Step 2: Evaluate each option

   const data = readonly(reactive({ count: 0 })) correctly wraps a reactive object with readonly. const data = reactive(readonly({ count: 0 })) tries to make a readonly object reactive, which is invalid. const data = readonly({ count: 0 }) skips reactive, so no reactivity. const data = reactive({ count: 0 }).readonly() uses a non-existent method.

3. Final Answer:

   const data = readonly(reactive({ count: 0 })) -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Wrap reactive with readonly = const data = readonly(reactive({ count: 0 })) [OK]

Hint: Wrap reactive() inside readonly() to make immutable reactive [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Calling readonly before reactive
• Skipping reactive and only using readonly
• Using non-existent readonly method on reactive

3. Given the code below, what will be logged to the console?

const state = reactive({ count: 1 });
const readOnlyState = readonly(state);

readOnlyState.count = 5;
console.log(readOnlyState.count);
state.count = 10;
console.log(readOnlyState.count);

medium

A. Error on assignment, then 10

B. 5 and 10

C. 1 and 1

D. 1 and 10

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand readonly behavior on assignment

   Assigning to readOnlyState.count causes a warning in development mode, but the change is ignored and value remains 1.

2. Step 2: Check reactive source update reflection

   First console.log(readOnlyState.count) outputs 1. Changing state.count to 10 updates the source, so second log is 10.

3. Final Answer:

   1 and 10 -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Readonly warns/ignores direct change, reflects source updates [OK]

Hint: Readonly blocks direct changes but shows source updates [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Expecting readonly to allow direct assignment
• Thinking readonly copies data instead of reflecting source
• Ignoring error/warning on assignment to readonly

4. Identify the error in the following Vue code using readonly:

import { reactive, readonly } from 'vue';
const data = readonly({ count: 0 });
data.count = 1;
console.log(data.count);

medium

A. You cannot assign to a readonly object directly.

B. You must use ref() instead of reactive() for readonly.

C. Readonly does not exist in Vue's API.

D. You must wrap a reactive object with readonly, not a plain object.

Solution

1. Step 1: Check how readonly is used

   The code creates a readonly proxy but then attempts data.count = 1.

2. Step 2: Understand readonly requirements

   Readonly prevents direct mutations, causing a development warning and ignoring the assignment.

3. Final Answer:

   You cannot assign to a readonly object directly. -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Cannot mutate readonly objects [OK]

Hint: Readonly objects cannot be mutated directly [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Attempting to mutate readonly objects directly
• Assuming readonly works without reactive
• Confusing readonly with ref

5. You have a reactive object state shared across components. You want to expose it as readonly to prevent accidental changes but still reflect updates. Which approach correctly achieves this and why?

const state = reactive({ user: { name: 'Alice' }, count: 0 });

// Options:
// A) const safeState = readonly(state);
// B) const safeState = reactive(state);
// C) const safeState = readonly({ ...state });
// D) const safeState = reactive(readonly(state));

hard

A. Create a shallow copy and make it readonly, but it won't reflect nested updates.

B. Wrap the reactive state with readonly to prevent direct changes but reflect updates.

C. Wrap the state again with reactive, which allows changes and duplicates reactivity.

D. Wrap readonly with reactive, which is invalid and causes errors.

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze each option's effect

   Wrap the reactive state with readonly to prevent direct changes but reflect updates. correctly wraps the reactive object with readonly, making it immutable but still reactive to source changes. Wrap the state again with reactive, which allows changes and duplicates reactivity. duplicates reactivity and allows changes. Create a shallow copy and make it readonly, but it won't reflect nested updates. creates a shallow copy, losing nested reactivity. Wrap readonly with reactive, which is invalid and causes errors. is invalid usage.

2. Step 2: Confirm correct approach for safe sharing

   Readonly wrapping reactive is the recommended way to share data safely without allowing modifications but reflecting updates.

3. Final Answer:

   Wrap the reactive state with readonly to prevent direct changes but reflect updates. -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Readonly wraps reactive for safe, immutable sharing [OK]

Hint: Wrap reactive with readonly to share immutable reactive data [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using shallow copies losing nested reactivity
• Wrapping readonly inside reactive incorrectly
• Duplicating reactivity causing unexpected mutations