Bird
Raised Fist0
Typescriptprogramming~20 mins

Higher-order function types in Typescript - Practice Problems & Coding Challenges

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Challenge - 5 Problems
🎖️
Higher-order Function Master
Get all challenges correct to earn this badge!
Test your skills under time pressure!
❓ Predict Output
intermediate
2:00remaining
Output of a higher-order function returning a function
What is the output of the following TypeScript code?
Typescript
function multiplier(factor: number): (input: number) => number {
  return (input: number) => input * factor;
}
const double = multiplier(2);
console.log(double(5));
Aundefined
B10
CTypeError
D25
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Think about what the returned function does with the input.
🧠 Conceptual
intermediate
2:00remaining
Type of a function that takes a function and returns a function
Which TypeScript type correctly describes a function that takes a function (number => string) and returns a function (string => number)?
A(fn: (x: number) => string) => (y: string) => number
B(fn: (x: string) => string) => (y: number) => number
C(fn: (x: number) => number) => (y: string) => string
D(fn: (x: string) => number) => (y: number) => string
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Look carefully at the input and output types of the inner functions.
🔧 Debug
advanced
2:00remaining
Identify the error in higher-order function type usage
What error does this TypeScript code produce?
Typescript
function compose(f: (a: number) => string, g: (b: string) => boolean): (x: number) => boolean {
  return (x: number) => g(f(x));
}
const result = compose((n) => n.toString(), (s) => s.length > 2)(10);
console.log(result);
ANo error, outputs true
BTypeError at runtime
CTypeScript compile error: Argument of type '(n: number) => string' is not assignable to parameter of type '(a: number) => string'
DTypeScript compile error: Type 'boolean' is not assignable to type 'string'
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Check if the function types match and the composition is valid.
📝 Syntax
advanced
2:00remaining
Which option causes a syntax error in higher-order function type declaration?
Which of the following TypeScript function type declarations is syntactically invalid?
Arebmun >= )gnirts :y( >= )gnirts >= )rebmun :x( :nf(
B(fn: (x: number) => string) => (y: string) => number
C(fn: (x: number) => string) => (y string) => number
Dfn: (x: number) => string) => (y: string) => number
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Look for missing punctuation or keywords in the function parameter list.
🚀 Application
expert
2:00remaining
Determine the output count of a higher-order function returning multiple functions
Consider this TypeScript code. How many functions are returned and stored in the array 'funcs'?
Typescript
function createFuncs(): Array<() => number> {
  const funcs = [];
  for (let i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
    funcs.push(() => i);
  }
  return funcs;
}
const funcs = createFuncs();
console.log(funcs.length);
ATypeError
B0
C1
D3
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Count how many times the loop runs and how many functions are pushed.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is a higher-order function type in TypeScript?
easy
A. A function type that takes or returns another function
B. A function type that only returns a number
C. A function type that cannot accept parameters
D. A function type that only works with strings

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand function types

    Function types describe the input and output of functions in TypeScript.
  2. Step 2: Define higher-order function types

    Higher-order function types specifically involve functions that take other functions as parameters or return functions.
  3. Final Answer:

    A function type that takes or returns another function -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Higher-order function = function takes/returns function [OK]
Hint: Higher-order means function uses another function [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking higher-order means only returning numbers
  • Confusing higher-order with no parameters
  • Assuming it only works with strings
2. Which of the following is the correct TypeScript syntax for a higher-order function type that takes a function returning number and returns void?
easy
A. (fn: number) => void
B. fn: () => number => void
C. () => number => void
D. (fn: () => number) => void

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze the parameter type

    The parameter is a function with no arguments returning a number, written as () => number.
  2. Step 2: Analyze the return type

    The higher-order function returns void, so the full type is (fn: () => number) => void.
  3. Final Answer:

    (fn: () => number) => void -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Parameter is function, return is void [OK]
Hint: Use parentheses to wrap function parameter types [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Missing parentheses around function parameter
  • Writing arrow syntax incorrectly
  • Using wrong parameter types
3. What is the output of this TypeScript code?
type Fn = (x: number) => number;
function applyTwice(f: Fn, value: number): number {
return f(f(value));
}
const double: Fn = x => x * 2;
console.log(applyTwice(double, 3));
medium
A. 12
B. 6
C. 9
D. Error

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand applyTwice function

    It applies function f twice: f(f(value)).
  2. Step 2: Calculate output with double function

    double(3) = 6, then double(6) = 12, so result is 12.
  3. Final Answer:

    12 -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    applyTwice(double, 3) = 12 [OK]
Hint: Apply function twice step-by-step [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Calculating only one application of function
  • Confusing multiplication with addition
  • Expecting a syntax or runtime error
4. Identify the error in this TypeScript higher-order function type declaration:
type Mapper = (fn: (x: number) => number) => number[];
const mapToArray: Mapper = fn => {
return fn.map(x => x * 2);
};
medium
A. No error, code is correct
B. fn is a function, but .map is called on it incorrectly
C. fn parameter should be a number, not a function
D. Mapper type should return a function, not an array

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check type of fn parameter

    fn is a function (x: number) => number, not an array.
  2. Step 2: Analyze usage of fn.map

    Calling .map on fn is invalid because fn is not an array but a function.
  3. Final Answer:

    fn is a function, but .map is called on it incorrectly -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Function cannot use .map method [OK]
Hint: Functions don't have .map method [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming function can use array methods
  • Misreading return type
  • Ignoring parameter types
5. Given this TypeScript type for a higher-order function:
type Compose = <T, U, V>(f: (b: U) => V, g: (a: T) => U) => (a: T) => V;

Which implementation correctly matches this type?
hard
A. const compose: Compose = (f, g) => a => g(f(a));
B. const compose: Compose = (f, g) => (a, b) => f(a) + g(b);
C. const compose: Compose = (f, g) => a => f(g(a));
D. const compose: Compose = (f, g) => a => f(a) * g(a);

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand Compose type

    Compose takes two functions f and g, returns a function that applies g then f.
  2. Step 2: Check each implementation

    const compose: Compose = (f, g) => a => f(g(a)); applies f(g(a)) which matches the type. Others do not follow the composition pattern.
  3. Final Answer:

    const compose: Compose = (f, g) => a => f(g(a)); -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Compose = f(g(a)) [OK]
Hint: Compose means f(g(a)) order [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Reversing function order
  • Adding parameters incorrectly
  • Using arithmetic instead of function calls
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard