A mapped type creates a new type by transforming each property of an existing type using a template. It lets you apply the same operation to all properties easily.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Syntax of a basic mapped type
type NewType = { [Key in keyof OldType]: OldType[Key] } This means: for each property Key in OldType, create a property Key with the same type.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What does keyof do in mapped types?
keyof extracts all property names (keys) of a type as a union of string literal types. It helps to loop over all keys in a mapped type.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Example: Make all properties optional using mapped types
type Partial<T> = { [P in keyof T]?: T[P] } This creates a new type where all properties of T are optional.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Can mapped types change property types?
Yes! You can transform property types. For example, { [P in keyof T]: string } makes all properties have type string regardless of original type.
Click to reveal answer
What does keyof return when used on a type?
AThe type's methods only
BThe type's values
CThe type's constructor
DA union of the type's property names
✗ Incorrect
keyof returns a union of all property names (keys) of a type.
Which syntax correctly defines a mapped type over type T?
A{ [P in keyof T]: T[P] }
B{ T in keyof P: P[T] }
C{ [T of keyof P]: P[T] }
D{ [P of T]: keyof P }
✗ Incorrect
The correct syntax uses [P in keyof T] to iterate keys.
How to make all properties of a type optional using mapped types?
A{ optional [P in keyof T]: T[P] }
B{ [P in keyof T]?: T[P] }
C{ [P in keyof T]: optional T[P] }
D{ [P in keyof T]: T[P]? }
✗ Incorrect
Adding ? after the property name makes it optional.
Can mapped types change the type of properties?
AYes, they can assign new types to properties
BNo, they only copy original types
COnly for string properties
DOnly for number properties
✗ Incorrect
Mapped types can transform property types to any new type.
What is the purpose of mapped types?
ATo define classes
BTo execute functions on objects
CTo create new types by transforming properties of existing types
DTo import modules
✗ Incorrect
Mapped types help create new types by applying changes to each property of an existing type.
Explain how a basic mapped type works in TypeScript and give a simple example.
Think about looping over keys and creating a new type with the same properties.
You got /4 concepts.
Describe how you can use mapped types to make all properties of a type optional.
Focus on the question mark after the property name in the mapped type.
You got /4 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does a basic mapped type in TypeScript do?
easy
A. Runs a function on each property value at runtime
B. Imports types from external modules
C. Defines a class with mapped properties
D. Creates a new type by looping over keys of an existing type
Solution
Step 1: Understand mapped types concept
Mapped types create new types by iterating over keys of an existing type, transforming them.
Step 2: Differentiate from runtime behavior
Mapped types work at compile time for types, not runtime functions or imports.
Final Answer:
Creates a new type by looping over keys of an existing type -> Option D
Quick Check:
Mapped type = new type from keys [OK]
Hint: Mapped types loop keys to create new types [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing mapped types with runtime loops
Thinking mapped types define classes
Mixing mapped types with imports
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax for a basic mapped type in TypeScript?
easy
A. type NewType<T> = { K: T[K] }
B. type NewType<T> = (K in keyof T) => T[K]
C. type NewType<T> = { [K in keyof T]: T[K] }
D. type NewType<T> = { [K: string]: T }
Solution
Step 1: Identify mapped type syntax
Mapped types use square brackets with 'in' keyword: {[K in keyof T]: T[K]}
Step 2: Check each option
type NewType<T> = { [K in keyof T]: T[K] } matches correct syntax; B uses arrow function incorrectly; C lacks 'in' keyword; D uses string index, not keys of T.
Final Answer:
type NewType<T> = { [K in keyof T]: T[K] } -> Option C
Quick Check:
Mapped type syntax = {[K in keyof T]: T[K]} [OK]
Hint: Look for {[K in keyof T]: T[K]} pattern [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using arrow functions instead of mapped syntax
Missing 'in' keyword inside brackets
Using string index instead of keyof T
3. Given the type type Flags = { a: boolean; b: boolean; }, what is the type of type ReadonlyFlags = { readonly [K in keyof Flags]: Flags[K] }?
medium
A. { a: boolean; b: boolean; }
B. { readonly a: boolean; readonly b: boolean; }
C. { a?: boolean; b?: boolean; }
D. { [key: string]: boolean; }
Solution
Step 1: Understand the mapped type with readonly modifier
The mapped type adds 'readonly' before each property key, making all properties readonly.
Step 2: Compare with original type
Original Flags has mutable properties; ReadonlyFlags has same keys but readonly modifier added.
Hint: Readonly mapped types add 'readonly' before keys [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Ignoring readonly modifier effect
Confusing optional properties with readonly
Assuming type changes keys or values
4. Identify the error in this mapped type:
type PartialType<T> = { [K of keyof T]?: T[K] }
medium
A. Using 'of' instead of 'in' in the mapped type syntax
B. Missing semicolon after property declaration
C. Cannot use optional modifier '?' in mapped types
D. keyof T is invalid syntax
Solution
Step 1: Check mapped type syntax
The correct keyword inside mapped types is 'in', not 'of'.
Step 2: Validate other parts
Optional modifier '?' is valid; semicolon is optional; 'keyof T' is correct syntax.
Final Answer:
Using 'of' instead of 'in' in the mapped type syntax -> Option A
Quick Check:
Mapped types use 'in' keyword [OK]
Hint: Mapped types use 'in', not 'of' [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing 'in' with 'of' keyword
Thinking '?' is invalid in mapped types
Assuming semicolon is mandatory
5. How can you create a mapped type that makes all properties of a type optional and readonly in TypeScript?
hard
A. type OptionalReadonly<T> = { readonly [K in keyof T]?: T[K] }
B. type OptionalReadonly<T> = { [K in keyof T]: readonly T[K]? }
C. type OptionalReadonly<T> = { [K in keyof T]?: readonly T[K] }
D. type OptionalReadonly<T> = { readonly [K in keyof T]: T[K]? }
Solution
Step 1: Combine readonly and optional modifiers correctly
In mapped types, 'readonly' goes before the key, and '?' after the key to make properties optional and readonly.
Step 2: Analyze each option
type OptionalReadonly<T> = { readonly [K in keyof T]?: T[K] } correctly places 'readonly' before [K] and '?' after [K]. Options B, C, D misuse placement of modifiers.
Final Answer:
type OptionalReadonly<T> = { readonly [K in keyof T]?: T[K] } -> Option A
Quick Check:
Readonly + optional = readonly [K in keyof T]? [OK]
Hint: Put 'readonly' before and '?' after [K] in mapped types [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Placing '?' before 'readonly'
Putting 'readonly' after the key
Misplacing optional modifier on type instead of key
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.