Bird
Raised Fist0
Swiftprogramming~10 mins

Weak self and unowned self patterns in Swift - Interactive Code Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to capture self weakly inside the closure.

Swift
someAsyncFunction { [[1] self] in
    print(self?.description ?? "No self")
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aweak
Bunowned
Cstrong
Dstatic
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using 'unowned' when self might be nil causes crashes.
Forgetting to capture self weakly leads to retain cycles.
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to safely unwrap weak self inside the closure.

Swift
someAsyncFunction { [weak self] in
    guard let [1] = self else { return }
    print([1].description)
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
AweakSelf
BselfStrong
Cself
DstrongSelf
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using the same name 'self' for the constant causes confusion.
Not unwrapping weak self leads to optional usage errors.
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the closure capture list to avoid a retain cycle.

Swift
someAsyncFunction { [[1] self] in
    print(self.description)
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aunowned
Bweak
Cstrong
Dstatic
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using 'strong' causes retain cycles.
Using 'weak' requires optional unwrapping.
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to create a dictionary comprehension that filters and maps with weak self.

Swift
let results = items.compactMap { item in
    guard let [1] = self else { return nil }
    return item.value [2] 10 ? item.key : nil
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
AstrongSelf
B>
C<
Dself
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using 'self' directly without unwrapping weak self.
Using the wrong comparison operator.
5fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to create a closure that captures unowned self and uses it safely.

Swift
someAsyncFunction { [[1] self] in
    let message = self.[2] + " is ready"
    print(message)
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aunowned
Bstatus
C)
Dweak
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using 'weak' requires optional unwrapping.
Forgetting to close the print statement causes syntax errors.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main reason to use weak self inside a closure in Swift?
easy
A. To make self immutable inside the closure
B. To guarantee self will never be nil inside the closure
C. To prevent strong reference cycles and allow self to become nil
D. To create a copy of self for thread safety

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand strong reference cycles

    Strong reference cycles happen when closures capture self strongly, causing memory leaks.
  2. Step 2: Role of weak self

    Using weak self makes the reference to self optional and allows it to become nil, breaking the cycle.
  3. Final Answer:

    To prevent strong reference cycles and allow self to become nil -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Weak self avoids memory leaks = A [OK]
Hint: Weak self means self can be nil inside closures [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking weak self guarantees non-nil self
  • Confusing weak with unowned self
  • Assuming weak self copies self
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to capture self as unowned in a Swift closure?
easy
A. [weak self] in
B. [unowned self] in
C. [self unowned] in
D. [unowned] self in

Solution

  1. Step 1: Recall capture list syntax

    Swift uses square brackets with capture specifiers before in in closures.
  2. Step 2: Correct unowned syntax

    The correct syntax is [unowned self] in to capture self as unowned.
  3. Final Answer:

    [unowned self] in -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Unowned capture syntax = [unowned self] in [OK]
Hint: Capture lists use square brackets with 'unowned self' [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Swapping order like [self unowned]
  • Missing brackets or 'in' keyword
  • Using weak instead of unowned when asked
3. Consider this Swift code snippet:
class Example {
    var closure: (() -> Void)?
    func setup() {
        closure = { [weak self] in
            print(self == nil ? "nil" : "not nil")
        }
    }
}
let example = Example()
example.setup()
example.closure?()
What will be printed when example.closure?() is called?
medium
A. not nil
B. Compilation error
C. nil
D. Runtime crash

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze weak self capture

    The closure captures self weakly, so inside the closure self is optional.
  2. Step 2: Check self lifetime

    The example instance is still alive when closure?() is called, so self is not nil.
  3. Final Answer:

    not nil -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Weak self is alive here = not nil [OK]
Hint: If instance exists, weak self is not nil inside closure [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming weak self is always nil
  • Confusing weak self with unowned self
  • Expecting runtime crash due to optional
4. Identify the problem in this Swift code and choose the best fix:
class Person {
    var name = "Alice"
    lazy var greet: () -> Void = {
        print("Hello, \(self.name)!")
    }
}
let p = Person()
p.greet()
medium
A. Make greet a regular function instead of closure
B. Use [weak self] in closure to avoid strong reference cycle
C. Use [unowned self] in closure to avoid strong reference cycle
D. No problem; code works fine

Solution

  1. Step 1: Detect strong reference cycle risk

    The closure captures self strongly, and greet is lazy var, so cycle possible.
  2. Step 2: Choose unowned self for non-optional self

    Since self will always exist when greet is called, unowned self is safe and avoids optional unwrapping.
  3. Final Answer:

    Use [unowned self] in closure to avoid strong reference cycle -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Unowned self for guaranteed self = C [OK]
Hint: Use unowned self if self always exists in closure [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Ignoring strong reference cycles
  • Using weak self and forcing unwrap unnecessarily
  • Thinking no problem exists
5. You have a Swift class that manages a network request with a closure callback. You want to avoid memory leaks but also avoid optional unwrapping inside the closure. Which pattern should you use and why? Choose the best explanation.
hard
A. Do not capture self at all to avoid any reference issues
B. Use weak self to avoid leaks and unwrap self safely inside closure
C. Use strong self to keep the instance alive during the closure execution
D. Use unowned self because self will outlive the closure, avoiding optionals

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand lifetime of self and closure

    If self will definitely exist while closure runs, unowned self is safe and avoids optionals.
  2. Step 2: Compare weak vs unowned for this case

    weak self requires optional unwrapping, but unowned self assumes self exists, simplifying code and avoiding leaks.
  3. Final Answer:

    Use unowned self because self will outlive the closure, avoiding optionals -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Unowned self for guaranteed lifetime = A [OK]
Hint: Use unowned if self guaranteed alive, else weak [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using weak self but not unwrapping safely
  • Using strong self causing memory leaks
  • Ignoring self capture causing leaks
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard