Bird
Raised Fist0
Spring Bootframework~8 mins

Nested DTOs in Spring Boot - Performance & Optimization

Choose your learning style10 modes available

Start learning this pattern below

Jump into concepts and practice - no test required

or
Recommended
Test this pattern10 questions across easy, medium, and hard to know if this pattern is strong
Performance: Nested DTOs
MEDIUM IMPACT
Nested DTOs affect the data serialization and deserialization time during API calls, impacting response time and client rendering speed.
Sending complex data structures in API responses
Spring Boot
public class OrderDTO {
  private String customerName;
  private String customerCity;
  private List<String> productNames;
  // getters and setters
}
Flattening DTOs reduces nesting, lowers payload size, and simplifies serialization.
📈 Performance GainSingle serialization pass, reduces payload size by 30-50%, improves LCP and client render speed.
Sending complex data structures in API responses
Spring Boot
public class OrderDTO {
  private CustomerDTO customer;
  private List<ProductDTO> products;
  // getters and setters
}

public class CustomerDTO {
  private AddressDTO address;
  // getters and setters
}

public class AddressDTO {
  private String street;
  private String city;
  private CountryDTO country;
  // getters and setters
}

public class CountryDTO {
  private String name;
  private String code;
  // getters and setters
}
Deep nesting causes large JSON payloads and complex serialization, increasing response time and client parsing cost.
📉 Performance CostTriggers multiple serialization passes and increases payload size by 30-50%, blocking rendering longer.
Performance Comparison
PatternDOM OperationsReflowsPaint CostVerdict
Deeply Nested DTOsHigh due to complex data bindingMultiple reflows possible if UI updates per nested dataHigh paint cost from large DOM updates[X] Bad
Flattened DTOsLower DOM operationsSingle reflow after data bindingLower paint cost with simpler DOM[OK] Good
Rendering Pipeline
Nested DTOs increase JSON size and complexity, causing longer parsing and rendering time on the client side.
Network Transfer
JSON Parsing
DOM Update
⚠️ BottleneckJSON Parsing and DOM Update due to large payload and complex data structure
Core Web Vital Affected
LCP
Nested DTOs affect the data serialization and deserialization time during API calls, impacting response time and client rendering speed.
Optimization Tips
1Avoid deep nesting in DTOs to reduce JSON payload size.
2Flatten DTOs to simplify serialization and speed up client parsing.
3Monitor API payload size and parsing time to optimize LCP.
Performance Quiz - 3 Questions
Test your performance knowledge
How do deeply nested DTOs affect API response performance?
AIncrease payload size and serialization time
BReduce payload size and speed up serialization
CHave no impact on performance
DOnly affect server CPU usage, not client
DevTools: Network
How to check: Open DevTools, go to Network tab, inspect API response payload size and timing for JSON data.
What to look for: Look for large JSON payload size and long transfer or parsing times indicating nested DTO overhead.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of using Nested DTOs in Spring Boot applications?
easy
A. To handle HTTP requests without controllers
B. To group related data inside other data objects for better structure
C. To replace entity classes with simpler objects
D. To improve database query performance automatically

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand DTO role

    DTOs (Data Transfer Objects) are used to carry data between processes or layers.
  2. Step 2: Identify Nested DTO purpose

    Nested DTOs group related data inside other DTOs to represent complex data structures clearly.
  3. Final Answer:

    To group related data inside other data objects for better structure -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Nested DTOs = Group related data [OK]
Hint: Nested DTOs organize data inside other objects [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking nested DTOs improve database speed
  • Confusing DTOs with entities
  • Assuming nested DTOs replace controllers
2. Which of the following is the correct way to declare a nested DTO class inside a parent DTO in Spring Boot?
easy
A. public class ParentDTO { private class ChildDTO { private String name; } }
B. public class ParentDTO { class ChildDTO { private String name; } }
C. public class ParentDTO { public static class ChildDTO { private String name; } }
D. public class ParentDTO { static class ChildDTO { public String name; } }

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check nested class modifiers

    Static nested classes are recommended for DTOs to avoid implicit reference to outer class.
  2. Step 2: Validate access modifiers

    Public static nested class with private fields and getters/setters is standard practice.
  3. Final Answer:

    public class ParentDTO { public static class ChildDTO { private String name; } } -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Static nested class with public modifier = public class ParentDTO { public static class ChildDTO { private String name; } } [OK]
Hint: Use public static nested class for nested DTOs [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using non-static nested classes causing memory leaks
  • Declaring nested class as private making it inaccessible
  • Using public fields instead of private with getters/setters
3. Given the following nested DTO classes, what will be the output of System.out.println(order.getCustomer().getName()); if order is initialized as below?
public class OrderDTO {
  private CustomerDTO customer;
  public CustomerDTO getCustomer() { return customer; }
  public void setCustomer(CustomerDTO customer) { this.customer = customer; }
  public static class CustomerDTO {
    private String name;
    public String getName() { return name; }
    public void setName(String name) { this.name = name; }
  }
}

OrderDTO order = new OrderDTO();
OrderDTO.CustomerDTO cust = new OrderDTO.CustomerDTO();
cust.setName("Alice");
order.setCustomer(cust);
medium
A. Alice
B. null
C. Compilation error
D. Runtime NullPointerException

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze object initialization

    The customer object is created and its name is set to "Alice" before being assigned to order.
  2. Step 2: Check method calls

    Calling order.getCustomer().getName() returns the name "Alice" as set previously.
  3. Final Answer:

    Alice -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Nested DTO getter returns set value = Alice [OK]
Hint: Set nested DTO fields before accessing getters [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Forgetting to set nested DTO before calling getter
  • Confusing null with empty string
  • Assuming compilation error due to nested class
4. Identify the error in the following nested DTO code snippet:
public class UserDTO {
  private AddressDTO address;
  public static class AddressDTO {
    private String city;
    public String getCity() { return city; }
    public void setCity(String city) { this.city = city; }
  }

  public AddressDTO getAddress() { return address; }
  public void setAddress(AddressDTO address) { this.address = address; }
}

UserDTO user = new UserDTO();
user.getAddress().setCity("Paris");
medium
A. Compilation error due to missing constructor
B. No error, code runs correctly
C. IllegalAccessError on accessing city field
D. NullPointerException because address is not initialized

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check object initialization

    The address field in UserDTO is never initialized, so it is null by default.
  2. Step 2: Analyze method call

    Calling user.getAddress().setCity("Paris") tries to call setCity on null, causing NullPointerException.
  3. Final Answer:

    NullPointerException because address is not initialized -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Uninitialized nested DTO causes NullPointerException [OK]
Hint: Always initialize nested DTO before calling its methods [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming default constructor initializes nested DTO
  • Thinking compilation error occurs
  • Ignoring possibility of NullPointerException
5. You have a nested DTO structure where OrderDTO contains a list of ItemDTO objects. You want to convert this nested DTO into a flat list of item names using Java streams. Which code snippet correctly achieves this?
public class OrderDTO {
  private List<ItemDTO> items;
  public List<ItemDTO> getItems() { return items; }
  public void setItems(List<ItemDTO> items) { this.items = items; }
  public static class ItemDTO {
    private String name;
    public String getName() { return name; }
    public void setName(String name) { this.name = name; }
  }
}

OrderDTO order = ...; // initialized with items
hard
A. List<String> names = order.getItems().stream().map(OrderDTO.ItemDTO::getName).toList();
B. List<String> names = order.getItems().stream().flatMap(ItemDTO::getName).collect(Collectors.toList());
C. List<String> names = order.getItems().map(ItemDTO::getName).collect(Collectors.toList());
D. List<String> names = order.getItems().stream().map(item -> item.name).collect(Collectors.toList());

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand stream mapping

    To get a list of names, map each ItemDTO to its name using map(OrderDTO.ItemDTO::getName).
  2. Step 2: Collect results

    Use toList() (Java 16+) or collect(Collectors.toList()) to gather results into a list.
  3. Final Answer:

    List<String> names = order.getItems().stream().map(OrderDTO.ItemDTO::getName).toList(); -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Stream map + toList() = List<String> names = order.getItems().stream().map(OrderDTO.ItemDTO::getName).toList(); [OK]
Hint: Use stream().map(...).toList() to extract nested DTO fields [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using flatMap instead of map for simple field extraction
  • Calling map on List directly without stream()
  • Accessing private fields without getter