📖 Scenario: You are a data analyst working with two sets of related data points. You want to find out how strongly these two sets are related in terms of their rank order, not just their actual values.
🎯 Goal: Build a small Python program that calculates the Spearman correlation coefficient between two lists of numbers using the scipy library.
📋 What You'll Learn
Create two lists of numbers named data1 and data2 with exact values.
Create a variable named alpha to set the significance level.
Use scipy.stats.spearmanr to calculate the Spearman correlation coefficient and p-value.
Print the Spearman correlation coefficient and the p-value.
💡 Why This Matters
🌍 Real World
Spearman correlation is used when you want to measure how well two variables relate in terms of their order or rank, such as customer satisfaction rankings or survey responses.
💼 Career
Data analysts and scientists use Spearman correlation to find relationships in data that are not necessarily linear, helping in decision making and reporting.
Progress0 / 4 steps
1
Create the data lists
Create two lists called data1 and data2 with these exact values: data1 = [10, 20, 30, 40, 50] and data2 = [12, 24, 33, 47, 52].
SciPy
Hint
Use square brackets to create lists and separate numbers with commas.
2
Set the significance level
Create a variable called alpha and set it to 0.05 to represent the significance level for the correlation test.
SciPy
Hint
Use a simple assignment statement to create alpha.
3
Calculate Spearman correlation
Import spearmanr from scipy.stats. Then use spearmanr(data1, data2) to calculate the Spearman correlation coefficient and p-value. Store the results in variables called corr and p_value.
SciPy
Hint
Use from scipy.stats import spearmanr to import the function.
4
Print the Spearman correlation and p-value
Print the Spearman correlation coefficient stored in corr and the p-value stored in p_value using two separate print statements.
SciPy
Hint
Use print(corr) and print(p_value) to show the results.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the Spearman correlation measure between two variables?
easy
A. The variance of a single variable
B. The strength and direction of a monotonic relationship based on ranks
C. The difference in means of two variables
D. The linear relationship between two variables
Solution
Step 1: Understand correlation types
Spearman correlation measures how two variables move together based on their rank order, not their actual values.
Step 2: Compare with other correlations
Unlike Pearson correlation, which measures linear relationships, Spearman focuses on monotonic relationships using ranks.
Final Answer:
The strength and direction of a monotonic relationship based on ranks -> Option B
Quick Check:
Spearman = monotonic rank correlation [OK]
Hint: Spearman uses ranks, not raw values, to find monotonic links [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing Spearman with Pearson correlation
Thinking it measures linear relationships only
Assuming it compares means or variances
2. Which of the following is the correct way to import the Spearman correlation function from scipy?
easy
A. from scipy.stats import spearmanr
B. import scipy.spearmanr
C. from scipy import spearmanr
D. import spearmanr from scipy.stats
Solution
Step 1: Recall scipy.stats module structure
The Spearman correlation function is inside the stats submodule of scipy, so it must be imported from scipy.stats.
Step 2: Check correct import syntax
The correct Python syntax to import a function is 'from module import function', so 'from scipy.stats import spearmanr' is correct.
Final Answer:
from scipy.stats import spearmanr -> Option A
Quick Check:
Correct import syntax = from scipy.stats import spearmanr [OK]
Hint: Use 'from scipy.stats import spearmanr' to import correctly [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Trying to import spearmanr directly from scipy
Using incorrect import syntax like 'import spearmanr from ...'
Missing the stats submodule in import
3. What is the output of this code snippet?
from scipy.stats import spearmanr
x = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
y = [5, 6, 7, 8, 7]
result = spearmanr(x, y)
print(round(result.correlation, 2))
medium
A. 0.5
B. 0.9
C. 1.0
D. 0.82
Solution
Step 1: Understand the data ranks
x is increasing from 1 to 5, y mostly increases but has a slight drop at the end (7 instead of 9), so ranks are similar but not perfect.
Step 2: Calculate Spearman correlation
Spearman correlation measures rank similarity; here it is less than 1 but still strong, about 0.82 after rounding.
Final Answer:
0.82 -> Option D
Quick Check:
Spearman correlation ≈ 0.82 [OK]
Hint: Spearman close to 1 means strong rank similarity [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Assuming perfect correlation (1.0) without checking data
Confusing Pearson and Spearman correlation values
Ignoring the slight rank difference in y
4. Identify the error in this code that calculates Spearman correlation:
from scipy.stats import spearmanr
x = [1, 2, 3]
y = [4, 5]
result = spearmanr(x, y)
print(result.correlation)
medium
A. Missing import for numpy
B. spearmanr function is misspelled
C. Lists x and y have different lengths
D. result.statistic attribute does not exist
Solution
Step 1: Check input data lengths
Spearman correlation requires both input lists to have the same length. Here, x has 3 elements, y has 2.
Step 2: Understand function requirements
Because lengths differ, spearmanr will raise an error. Other options are incorrect as spelling and attribute usage are correct.
Final Answer:
Lists x and y have different lengths -> Option C
Quick Check:
Input length mismatch causes error [OK]
Hint: Ensure input lists have equal length before correlation [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Ignoring length mismatch of input lists
Thinking spearmanr needs numpy import explicitly
Assuming result.statistic is invalid
5. You have two variables with many tied ranks and some missing values (NaNs). Which approach using scipy.stats.spearmanr is best to get a valid Spearman correlation?
hard
A. Use spearmanr with nan_policy='omit' to ignore NaNs and handle ties automatically
B. Replace NaNs with zeros and then use spearmanr without extra parameters
C. Remove all tied values manually before using spearmanr
D. Use spearmanr with nan_policy='raise' to get an error for NaNs
Solution
Step 1: Handle missing values properly
Spearman correlation in scipy can handle NaNs if nan_policy='omit' is set, which ignores NaNs safely.
Step 2: Understand tied ranks handling
Spearman correlation automatically manages tied ranks, so no manual removal is needed.
Step 3: Evaluate other options
Replacing NaNs with zeros or removing tied values manually can bias results; raising errors is not helpful for analysis.
Final Answer:
Use spearmanr with nan_policy='omit' to ignore NaNs and handle ties automatically -> Option A
Quick Check:
nan_policy='omit' + automatic tie handling = Use spearmanr with nan_policy='omit' to ignore NaNs and handle ties automatically [OK]
Hint: Use nan_policy='omit' to skip NaNs safely in spearmanr [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Replacing NaNs with zeros causing bias
Trying to remove tied ranks manually
Not setting nan_policy causing errors
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.