This checks if a is less than b. It is true because 5 is less than 10.
Rust
let a = 5;
let b = 10;
let result = a < b; // true
This checks if x is equal to y. It is true because both are 7.
Rust
let x = 7;
let y = 7;
let result = x == y; // true
This checks if m is not equal to n. It is true because 3 is not 8.
Rust
let m = 3;
let n = 8;
let result = m != n; // true
Sample Program
This program checks if a person is old enough to enter by comparing age with limit. It also prints if the score is passing by comparing score with passing_score.
Rust
fn main() {
let age = 20;
let limit = 18;
if age >= limit {
println!("You are allowed to enter.");
} else {
println!("You are not allowed to enter.");
}
let score = 85;
let passing_score = 60;
println!("Did you pass? {}", score >= passing_score);
}
OutputSuccess
Important Notes
Relational operators always return a boolean: true or false.
Use parentheses to group comparisons if combining with other operators.
Summary
Relational operators compare two values and return true or false.
Common operators: <, >, <=, >=, ==, !=.
They help make decisions in your program based on value comparisons.
Practice
(1/5)
1. Which of the following relational operators in Rust checks if two values are not equal?
easy
A. !=
B. ==
C. <=
D. >=
Solution
Step 1: Understand the meaning of relational operators
Relational operators compare two values and return true or false based on the comparison.
Step 2: Identify the operator for 'not equal'
The operator '!=' means 'not equal to' in Rust.
Final Answer:
!= -> Option A
Quick Check:
Not equal operator = != [OK]
Hint: Remember '!=' means not equal in most languages [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing '!=' with '=='
Using '<>' which is not valid in Rust
Mixing up '<=' and '>='
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to check if variable a is greater than or equal to variable b in Rust?
easy
A. a =>= b
B. a => b
C. a =< b
D. a >= b
Solution
Step 1: Recall Rust relational operator syntax
Rust uses '>=' to check if left value is greater than or equal to right value.
Step 2: Identify correct syntax among options
Only 'a >= b' matches the correct Rust syntax.
Final Answer:
a >= b -> Option D
Quick Check:
Greater or equal operator = >= [OK]
Hint: Greater or equal is '>=' not '=>' [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using '=>' instead of '>='
Swapping '=' and '<' in operators
Confusing assignment '=' with comparison
3. What will be the output of the following Rust code?
let x = 10;
let y = 20;
println!("{}", x < y);
medium
A. true
B. 20
C. 10
D. false
Solution
Step 1: Understand the comparison operation
The code compares if x (10) is less than y (20), which is true.
Step 2: Determine the printed output
Since the condition is true, the printed output will be 'true'.
Final Answer:
true -> Option A
Quick Check:
10 < 20 = true [OK]
Hint: Compare values carefully; 10 is less than 20 [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing output with variable values
Thinking it prints the smaller number
Mixing up < and > operators
4. Identify the error in the following Rust code snippet:
let a = 5;
let b = 10;
if a <> b {
println!("Not equal");
}
medium
A. Variables a and b must be mutable
B. The operator '<>' is invalid in Rust
C. Missing semicolon after println!
D. The if statement needs parentheses
Solution
Step 1: Check the relational operator used
The operator '<>' is not a valid relational operator in Rust.
Step 2: Confirm correct operator for not equal
Rust uses '!=' to check if two values are not equal.
Final Answer:
The operator '<>' is invalid in Rust -> Option B
Quick Check:
Not equal operator = !=, not <> [OK]
Hint: Use '!=' for not equal, not '<>' [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using '<>' from other languages
Forgetting Rust requires '!='
Assuming parentheses needed in if condition
5. Given a list of integers, which Rust expression correctly checks if all elements are greater than 0 using relational operators?
hard
A. numbers.iter().filter(|&x| x > 0)
B. numbers.iter().any(|&x| x > 0)
C. numbers.iter().all(|&x| x > 0)
D. numbers.iter().map(|&x| x > 0)
Solution
Step 1: Understand the requirement
We want to check if all elements in the list are greater than 0.
Step 2: Identify the correct iterator method
'all' returns true only if every element satisfies the condition x > 0.
Step 3: Confirm the closure syntax
The closure '|&x| x > 0' correctly compares each element to 0.
Final Answer:
numbers.iter().all(|&x| x > 0) -> Option C
Quick Check:
Check all elements > 0 with 'all' method [OK]
Hint: Use 'all' to check every element meets condition [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using 'any' which checks only one element
Using 'filter' which returns iterator, not bool
Using 'map' which transforms elements, not checks
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.