Finds the comment with ID 10 or returns nil if not found.
Ruby on Rails
Comment.find_by(id: 10)
Sample Program
This example shows how to use basic query interface methods to filter, order, limit, and check records in a Rails model.
Ruby on Rails
class User < ApplicationRecord
end
# Find users aged 25
users = User.where(age: 25)
# Order users by name ascending
ordered_users = User.order(name: :asc)
# Limit to 3 users
limited_users = User.limit(3)
# Check if any user exists with email example@example.com
exists = User.exists?(email: 'example@example.com')
puts "Users aged 25 count: #{users.count}"
puts "First user ordered by name: #{ordered_users.first&.name}"
puts "Limited users count: #{limited_users.count}"
puts "User with email exists? #{exists}"
OutputSuccess
Important Notes
Query methods return ActiveRecord::Relation objects that can be chained.
Calling count runs a SQL COUNT query, which is efficient.
Use safe navigation (&.) to avoid errors when no records are found.
Summary
The query interface lets you get data from the database easily without SQL.
You can filter, sort, limit, and check records using simple methods.
Methods can be combined to build complex queries step-by-step.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the where method do in Rails' query interface?
easy
A. Filters records based on given conditions
B. Deletes records from the database
C. Updates records with new values
D. Creates new records in the database
Solution
Step 1: Understand the purpose of where
The where method is used to filter records by specifying conditions, like filtering users by age.
Step 2: Compare with other methods
Methods like delete, update, and create perform different actions, not filtering.
Final Answer:
Filters records based on given conditions -> Option A
Quick Check:
where filters records [OK]
Hint: Remember: where = filter records by condition [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing where with update or delete
Thinking where creates or deletes records
Assuming where changes data instead of filtering
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to get all users ordered by their created_at date in descending order?
easy
A. User.order(:created_at, :desc)
B. User.order('created_at ASC')
C. User.order(created_at: :desc)
D. User.order(created_at => 'desc')
Solution
Step 1: Identify correct hash syntax for order
Rails expects a hash with column name as key and direction as symbol, like created_at: :desc.
Step 2: Check other options for syntax errors
User.order(:created_at, :desc) uses wrong argument format treating :desc as column name, User.order('created_at ASC') uses string with wrong direction, User.order(created_at => 'desc') uses wrong hash rocket syntax.
Final Answer:
User.order(created_at: :desc) -> Option C
Quick Check:
Correct hash syntax for order = User.order(created_at: :desc) [OK]
Hint: Use symbol keys and symbols for direction in order [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Passing multiple arguments instead of a hash
Using wrong direction like ASC in order string
Wrong hash syntax with => and string
3. Given the code Product.where(price: 100).limit(3).pluck(:name), what will be the output?
medium
A. An array of up to 3 product names with price 100
B. An array of all product names regardless of price
C. A single product name with price 100
D. An error because limit cannot be chained after where
Solution
Step 1: Understand chaining of query methods
where(price: 100) filters products with price 100, limit(3) restricts to 3 records, pluck(:name) extracts names into an array.
Step 2: Analyze output type
The result is an array of names, up to 3, matching the price condition.
Final Answer:
An array of up to 3 product names with price 100 -> Option A
Quick Check:
where + limit + pluck = filtered limited array [OK]
Hint: Chain filters, limits, then pluck for array output [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking pluck returns a single value
Assuming limit cannot be chained after where
Ignoring the filter condition in output
4. What is wrong with this query? User.where('age > ?', 18).order('name ASC').limit('five')
medium
A. The where clause syntax is incorrect
B. The limit argument should be an integer, not a string
C. The order method cannot use strings
D. The query is correct and will run without errors
Solution
Step 1: Check each method argument type
where('age > ?', 18) is correct, order('name ASC') accepts string, but limit('five') expects an integer, not a string.
Step 2: Identify the error source
Passing 'five' as a string sets limit to 0 because 'five'.to_i == 0, not the intended value.
Final Answer:
The limit argument should be an integer, not a string -> Option B
Quick Check:
limit needs integer, not string [OK]
Hint: limit must be a number, not a word string [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Passing string instead of integer to limit
Thinking order cannot take strings
Misreading where clause syntax
5. You want to find all Article records published after 2020, sorted by title ascending, but only show the first 5 titles. Which query is correct?
hard
A. Article.where(published_at: > Date.new(2020,1,1)).order(:title).limit(5).pluck(:title)
B. Article.limit(5).order(title: :asc).where('published_at > 2020-01-01').pluck(:title)
C. Article.where('published_at > 2020-01-01').order('title DESC').limit(5).pluck(:title)
D. Article.where('published_at > ?', Date.new(2020,1,1)).order(title: :asc).limit(5).pluck(:title)
Solution
Step 1: Check filtering condition syntax
Article.where('published_at > ?', Date.new(2020,1,1)).order(title: :asc).limit(5).pluck(:title) uses correct SQL placeholder with where('published_at > ?', Date.new(2020,1,1)). Article.where(published_at: > Date.new(2020,1,1)).order(:title).limit(5).pluck(:title) has invalid Ruby syntax. Article.where('published_at > 2020-01-01').order('title DESC').limit(5).pluck(:title) uses string date without quotes and wrong order direction.
Step 2: Verify order and limit usage
Article.where('published_at > ?', Date.new(2020,1,1)).order(title: :asc).limit(5).pluck(:title) orders by title ascending with symbol and limits to 5 records before pluck. Article.limit(5).order(title: :asc).where('published_at > ?', '2020-01-01').pluck(:title) applies limit before where, which is less efficient and may give wrong results.
Final Answer:
Article.where('published_at > ?', Date.new(2020,1,1)).order(title: :asc).limit(5).pluck(:title) -> Option D
Quick Check:
Correct where, order ascending, limit 5, pluck titles [OK]
Hint: Filter first, then order, limit, and pluck [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Wrong where syntax with > operator
Ordering descending instead of ascending
Limiting before filtering causing wrong results
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.