Bird
Raised Fist0
PyTorchml~8 mins

CNN architecture for image classification in PyTorch - Model Metrics & Evaluation

Choose your learning style10 modes available

Start learning this pattern below

Jump into concepts and practice - no test required

or
Recommended
Test this pattern10 questions across easy, medium, and hard to know if this pattern is strong
Metrics & Evaluation - CNN architecture for image classification
Which metric matters for CNN image classification and WHY

For image classification using CNNs, accuracy is often the main metric. It tells us how many images the model labels correctly out of all images. But accuracy alone can be misleading if classes are unbalanced.

So, we also look at precision and recall for each class. Precision shows how many predicted images of a class are actually correct. Recall shows how many images of a class the model found out of all that class has. The F1 score balances precision and recall.

These metrics help us understand if the CNN is good at recognizing images correctly and not mixing classes.

Confusion matrix example
          Predicted
          Cat  Dog  Bird
Actual Cat   50   2    3
       Dog    4  45    1
       Bird   2   3   40

Total samples = 150

True Positives (Cat) = 50
False Positives (Cat) = 4 + 2 = 6
False Negatives (Cat) = 2 + 3 = 5

Precision (Cat) = 50 / (50 + 6) = 0.89
Recall (Cat) = 50 / (50 + 5) = 0.91

This matrix shows how many images were correctly or wrongly classified by the CNN for each class.

Precision vs Recall tradeoff with examples

Imagine a CNN that classifies animals in photos. If it has high precision for "Dog", it means when it says "Dog", it is usually right. But it might miss some dogs (low recall).

If it has high recall for "Dog", it finds almost all dogs but might wrongly label some cats as dogs (lower precision).

For some tasks, like medical image classification, high recall is critical to not miss any disease. For others, like sorting photos, high precision might be more important to avoid mistakes.

Good vs Bad metric values for CNN image classification
  • Good: Accuracy above 90%, precision and recall above 85% for all classes means the CNN is reliable.
  • Bad: Accuracy around 50% or precision/recall below 60% means the CNN struggles to classify images correctly.
  • Very high accuracy but low recall on a class means the model misses many images of that class.
Common pitfalls in CNN metrics
  • Accuracy paradox: High accuracy can happen if one class dominates but the model ignores others.
  • Data leakage: If test images are too similar to training, metrics look better than real.
  • Overfitting: Training accuracy is high but test accuracy is low, meaning the CNN memorizes training images.
Self-check question

Your CNN model has 98% accuracy but only 12% recall on the "cat" class. Is it good for production?

Answer: No. The model misses most cat images (low recall), so it is not reliable for detecting cats even if overall accuracy is high.

Key Result
Accuracy shows overall correctness, but precision and recall reveal class-wise strengths and weaknesses in CNN image classification.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main role of convolutional layers in a CNN for image classification?
easy
A. To detect features like edges and textures in small parts of the image
B. To reduce the size of the image by downsampling
C. To combine all features into a final decision
D. To randomly change pixel values for data augmentation

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand convolutional layers

    Convolutional layers scan small parts of the image to find patterns like edges and textures.
  2. Step 2: Compare with other layers

    Pooling layers reduce image size, and fully connected layers make the final classification decision.
  3. Final Answer:

    To detect features like edges and textures in small parts of the image -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Convolutional layers = feature detection [OK]
Hint: Convolution layers find patterns, pooling shrinks images [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing pooling with convolution
  • Thinking fully connected layers detect features
  • Believing convolution layers change image size
2. Which of the following is the correct way to define a 2D convolutional layer in PyTorch with 3 input channels, 16 output channels, and a kernel size of 3?
easy
A. nn.Conv2d(16, 3, kernel_size=3)
B. nn.Conv1d(3, 16, kernel_size=3)
C. nn.Linear(3, 16, kernel_size=3)
D. nn.Conv2d(3, 16, kernel_size=3)

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify correct layer type and parameters

    For images, use nn.Conv2d with input channels first, then output channels, and kernel size.
  2. Step 2: Check each option

    nn.Conv2d(3, 16, kernel_size=3) uses nn.Conv2d(3, 16, kernel_size=3) which is correct. nn.Conv1d(3, 16, kernel_size=3) uses Conv1d (wrong dimension). nn.Linear(3, 16, kernel_size=3) uses Linear (not convolution). nn.Conv2d(16, 3, kernel_size=3) reverses input/output channels.
  3. Final Answer:

    nn.Conv2d(3, 16, kernel_size=3) -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Conv2d(input_channels, output_channels, kernel_size) = A [OK]
Hint: Conv2d uses (in_channels, out_channels, kernel_size) order [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using Conv1d instead of Conv2d for images
  • Swapping input and output channels
  • Using Linear layer for convolution
3. Given the following PyTorch CNN snippet, what is the output shape after the convolution and pooling layers if the input image size is (3, 32, 32)?
import torch
import torch.nn as nn

class SimpleCNN(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self):
        super().__init__()
        self.conv = nn.Conv2d(3, 8, kernel_size=3, padding=1)
        self.pool = nn.MaxPool2d(2, 2)
    def forward(self, x):
        x = self.conv(x)
        x = self.pool(x)
        return x

model = SimpleCNN()
input_tensor = torch.randn(1, 3, 32, 32)
output = model(input_tensor)
print(output.shape)
medium
A. torch.Size([1, 8, 30, 30])
B. torch.Size([1, 8, 16, 16])
C. torch.Size([1, 3, 16, 16])
D. torch.Size([1, 8, 32, 32])

Solution

  1. Step 1: Calculate output size after convolution

    Input size: 32x32, kernel=3, padding=1, stride=1 (default). Output size = (32 - 3 + 2*1)/1 + 1 = 32. Channels change from 3 to 8.
  2. Step 2: Calculate output size after max pooling

    MaxPool2d with kernel=2, stride=2 halves width and height: 32/2 = 16. Channels remain 8.
  3. Final Answer:

    torch.Size([1, 8, 16, 16]) -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Conv keeps size, pooling halves it = B [OK]
Hint: Conv with padding keeps size; pooling halves it [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Ignoring padding effect on convolution output size
  • Forgetting pooling halves spatial dimensions
  • Mixing up input and output channels
4. Identify the error in this PyTorch CNN model definition for image classification:
import torch.nn as nn

class Net(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self):
        super(Net, self).__init__()
        self.conv1 = nn.Conv2d(3, 16, 3)
        self.pool = nn.MaxPool2d(2, 2)
        self.fc1 = nn.Linear(16 * 15 * 15, 10)

    def forward(self, x):
        x = self.pool(F.relu(self.conv1(x)))
        x = x.view(-1, 16 * 15 * 15)
        x = self.fc1(x)
        return x
medium
A. Pooling layer should come before convolution
B. The input size to fc1 is incorrect due to convolution output size mismatch
C. Missing import for torch.nn.functional as F
D. The number of output classes in fc1 should be 16

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check imports and usage

    The forward method uses F.relu but torch.nn.functional as F is not imported, causing a NameError.
  2. Step 2: Verify other parts

    Input size to fc1 assumes input image size 32x32 with kernel=3 and no padding, output size after conv and pool is 15x15, so fc1 input size is correct. Pooling after conv is correct. Output classes 10 is reasonable.
  3. Final Answer:

    Missing import for torch.nn.functional as F -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Using F.relu without import = A [OK]
Hint: Check all used modules are imported [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Forgetting to import torch.nn.functional as F
  • Miscalculating fc1 input size
  • Changing layer order incorrectly
5. You want to build a CNN in PyTorch to classify 64x64 RGB images into 5 classes. Which architecture below correctly combines convolution, pooling, and fully connected layers to achieve this?
hard
A.
class CNN(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self):
        super().__init__()
        self.conv1 = nn.Conv2d(3, 10, 5)
        self.pool = nn.MaxPool2d(2, 2)
        self.conv2 = nn.Conv2d(10, 20, 5)
        self.fc1 = nn.Linear(20 * 13 * 13, 50)
        self.fc2 = nn.Linear(50, 5)
    def forward(self, x):
        x = self.pool(F.relu(self.conv1(x)))
        x = self.pool(F.relu(self.conv2(x)))
        x = x.view(-1, 20 * 13 * 13)
        x = F.relu(self.fc1(x))
        x = self.fc2(x)
        return x
B.
class CNN(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self):
        super().__init__()
        self.conv1 = nn.Conv2d(3, 10, 3)
        self.pool = nn.MaxPool2d(2, 2)
        self.fc1 = nn.Linear(10 * 32 * 32, 5)
    def forward(self, x):
        x = self.pool(F.relu(self.conv1(x)))
        x = x.view(-1, 10 * 32 * 32)
        x = self.fc1(x)
        return x
C.
class CNN(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self):
        super().__init__()
        self.conv1 = nn.Conv2d(3, 10, 5)
        self.pool = nn.MaxPool2d(2, 2)
        self.conv2 = nn.Conv2d(10, 20, 5)
        self.fc1 = nn.Linear(20 * 12 * 12, 50)
        self.fc2 = nn.Linear(50, 5)
    def forward(self, x):
        x = self.pool(F.relu(self.conv1(x)))
        x = self.pool(F.relu(self.conv2(x)))
        x = x.view(-1, 20 * 12 * 12)
        x = F.relu(self.fc1(x))
        x = self.fc2(x)
        return x
D.
class CNN(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self):
        super().__init__()
        self.conv1 = nn.Conv2d(3, 10, 5)
        self.pool = nn.MaxPool2d(2, 2)
        self.conv2 = nn.Conv2d(10, 20, 5)
        self.fc1 = nn.Linear(20 * 14 * 14, 50)
        self.fc2 = nn.Linear(50, 5)
    def forward(self, x):
        x = self.pool(F.relu(self.conv1(x)))
        x = self.pool(F.relu(self.conv2(x)))
        x = x.view(-1, 20 * 14 * 14)
        x = F.relu(self.fc1(x))
        x = self.fc2(x)
        return x

Solution

  1. Step 1: Calculate output sizes after conv and pooling layers

    Input: 64x64. Conv1 kernel=5, padding=0: (64-5+1)=60, pool kernel=2 stride=2: 60/2=30. Conv2 kernel=5: (30-5+1)=26, pool: 26/2=13. Final size 20x13x13.
  2. Step 2: Check fc1 input sizes

    class CNN(nn.Module):
        def __init__(self):
            super().__init__()
            self.conv1 = nn.Conv2d(3, 10, 5)
            self.pool = nn.MaxPool2d(2, 2)
            self.conv2 = nn.Conv2d(10, 20, 5)
            self.fc1 = nn.Linear(20 * 13 * 13, 50)
            self.fc2 = nn.Linear(50, 5)
        def forward(self, x):
            x = self.pool(F.relu(self.conv1(x)))
            x = self.pool(F.relu(self.conv2(x)))
            x = x.view(-1, 20 * 13 * 13)
            x = F.relu(self.fc1(x))
            x = self.fc2(x)
            return x
    : 20*13*13 correct.
    class CNN(nn.Module):
        def __init__(self):
            super().__init__()
            self.conv1 = nn.Conv2d(3, 10, 3)
            self.pool = nn.MaxPool2d(2, 2)
            self.fc1 = nn.Linear(10 * 32 * 32, 5)
        def forward(self, x):
            x = self.pool(F.relu(self.conv1(x)))
            x = x.view(-1, 10 * 32 * 32)
            x = self.fc1(x)
            return x
    : single conv kernel=3 gives ~10*31*31 but uses 10*32*32 wrong.
    class CNN(nn.Module):
        def __init__(self):
            super().__init__()
            self.conv1 = nn.Conv2d(3, 10, 5)
            self.pool = nn.MaxPool2d(2, 2)
            self.conv2 = nn.Conv2d(10, 20, 5)
            self.fc1 = nn.Linear(20 * 12 * 12, 50)
            self.fc2 = nn.Linear(50, 5)
        def forward(self, x):
            x = self.pool(F.relu(self.conv1(x)))
            x = self.pool(F.relu(self.conv2(x)))
            x = x.view(-1, 20 * 12 * 12)
            x = F.relu(self.fc1(x))
            x = self.fc2(x)
            return x
    : 20*12*12 too small.
    class CNN(nn.Module):
        def __init__(self):
            super().__init__()
            self.conv1 = nn.Conv2d(3, 10, 5)
            self.pool = nn.MaxPool2d(2, 2)
            self.conv2 = nn.Conv2d(10, 20, 5)
            self.fc1 = nn.Linear(20 * 14 * 14, 50)
            self.fc2 = nn.Linear(50, 5)
        def forward(self, x):
            x = self.pool(F.relu(self.conv1(x)))
            x = self.pool(F.relu(self.conv2(x)))
            x = x.view(-1, 20 * 14 * 14)
            x = F.relu(self.fc1(x))
            x = self.fc2(x)
            return x
    : 20*14*14 too big.
  3. Final Answer:

    nn.Linear(20 * 13 * 13, 50) -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    64->60->30->26->13 = 20x13x13 -> A [OK]
Hint: Calculate conv and pool sizes stepwise to find fc input size [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Ignoring how kernel size reduces image dimensions
  • Assuming pooling does not halve size
  • Mismatching fc layer input size with conv output