Branch coverage in PyTest - Build an Automation Script
Start learning this pattern below
Jump into concepts and practice - no test required
import pytest def check_number_sign(num: int) -> str: if num > 0: return 'Positive' elif num == 0: return 'Zero' else: return 'Negative' @pytest.mark.parametrize('input_value, expected_output', [ (10, 'Positive'), (0, 'Zero'), (-5, 'Negative') ]) def test_check_number_sign(input_value, expected_output): assert check_number_sign(input_value) == expected_output
The function check_number_sign has three branches: one for positive numbers, one for zero, and one for negative numbers.
The test uses pytest.mark.parametrize to run the same test logic with three different inputs, covering all branches.
This ensures 100% branch coverage because each conditional path is tested.
Assertions check that the function returns the correct string for each input.
Using parametrize keeps the test code clean and easy to maintain.
Now add data-driven testing with 3 different inputs using pytest parametrize
Practice
What does branch coverage measure in pytest testing?
Solution
Step 1: Understand branch coverage concept
Branch coverage ensures every possible path in decision points (like if-else) is tested.Step 2: Compare with other coverage types
Line coverage counts executed lines, but branch coverage focuses on decision paths.Final Answer:
It checks if all decision paths in the code are tested. -> Option AQuick Check:
Branch coverage = all decision paths tested [OK]
- Confusing branch coverage with line coverage
- Thinking it counts test cases
- Assuming it checks syntax errors
Which pytest command option enables branch coverage measurement?
Solution
Step 1: Recall pytest coverage options
The option--covenables coverage measurement, and--cov-branchadds branch coverage.Step 2: Identify correct combined command
Both options must be used together aspytest --cov --cov-branchto measure branch coverage.Final Answer:
pytest --cov --cov-branch -> Option AQuick Check:
Use --cov with --cov-branch for branch coverage [OK]
- Using only --cov-branch without --cov
- Typing incorrect option names
- Assuming branch coverage is default
Given this code snippet tested with pytest and branch coverage enabled, what is the branch coverage result?
def check_num(x):
if x > 0:
return "Positive"
else:
return "Non-positive"
# Test cases:
assert check_num(5) == "Positive"
Solution
Step 1: Identify branches in the code
The function has two branches: one for x > 0 and one for else (x ≤ 0).Step 2: Check which branches are tested
The test calls check_num(5), which covers only the x > 0 branch, missing the else branch.Final Answer:
50% branch coverage -> Option DQuick Check:
One branch tested out of two = 50% [OK]
- Assuming one test covers all branches
- Confusing line coverage with branch coverage
- Ignoring else branch testing
Identify the error in this pytest test that aims for full branch coverage:
def classify(n):
if n > 10:
return "High"
elif n > 5:
return "Medium"
else:
return "Low"
def test_classify():
assert classify(12) == "High"
assert classify(7) == "Medium"
Solution
Step 1: Analyze branches in classify()
There are three branches: n > 10, n > 5, and else (n ≤ 5).Step 2: Check test coverage of branches
Tests cover n=12 (High) and n=7 (Medium), but no test covers n ≤ 5 (Low) branch.Final Answer:
Missing test for the else branch (n ≤ 5). -> Option CQuick Check:
All branches need tests for full coverage [OK]
- Assuming two tests cover all branches
- Looking for syntax errors where none exist
- Ignoring else branch testing
You have this function. Which set of test inputs achieves 100% branch coverage?
def analyze_score(score):
if score >= 90:
return "A"
elif score >= 75:
return "B"
else:
return "C"
Solution
Step 1: Identify all branches
Branches: score ≥ 90 ("A"), score ≥ 75 ("B"), else "C".Step 2: Check which inputs cover all branches
Input 95 covers "A" branch; 80 covers score ≥ 75 ("B"); 70 covers else "C" branch. This covers all branches.Final Answer:
[95, 80, 70] -> Option BQuick Check:
Test inputs cover all if-elif-else paths [OK]
- Missing coverage for one of the branches
- Choosing inputs that skip else branch
- Assuming close values cover all branches
