BSum all values in the 'Value' column ignoring groups
CApply sum to the whole DataFrame
DCreate a new column with sums
✗ Incorrect
It sums the 'Value' column for each group defined by 'Category'.
Which pandas method is best for simple aggregations like mean or sum after groupby?
A.apply()
B.filter()
C.agg()
D.transform()
✗ Incorrect
.agg() is designed for simple aggregation functions like mean or sum.
Explain how to use a custom function with pandas groupby to calculate a special metric for each group.
Think about splitting data, defining a function, and applying it.
You got /4 concepts.
Describe the difference between using .agg() and .apply() after grouping data in pandas.
One is for simple aggregations, the other for flexible custom functions.
You got /4 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the groupby function in pandas primarily do?
easy
A. It splits data into groups based on column values for separate analysis.
B. It sorts the entire DataFrame by column values.
C. It deletes duplicate rows from the DataFrame.
D. It merges two DataFrames based on a key column.
Solution
Step 1: Understand the purpose of groupby
The groupby function divides data into groups based on unique values in one or more columns.
Step 2: Recognize the use of groups
After grouping, you can apply functions to each group separately for analysis or aggregation.
Final Answer:
It splits data into groups based on column values for separate analysis. -> Option A
Quick Check:
Group data = split by column values [OK]
Hint: GroupBy splits data into parts by column values [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing groupby with sorting
Thinking groupby deletes duplicates
Mixing groupby with merge operations
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to apply a custom function my_func to each group after grouping by column 'Category' in a DataFrame df?
easy
A. df.groupby('Category').apply(my_func)
B. df.apply.groupby('Category')(my_func)
C. df.groupby('Category').my_func()
D. df.group_by('Category').apply(my_func)
Solution
Step 1: Recall pandas groupby syntax
The correct method to group by a column is df.groupby('ColumnName').
Step 2: Apply a custom function to groups
Use .apply(function) after grouping to run the function on each group.
Hint: Use groupby('col').apply(func) to run custom function [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using wrong method name like group_by
Calling function directly on groupby object
Misplacing apply before groupby
3. Given the DataFrame df below:
import pandas as pd
data = {'Team': ['A', 'A', 'B', 'B', 'C'], 'Points': [10, 15, 10, 20, 30]}
df = pd.DataFrame(data)
# Custom function to get range of points in group
def point_range(x):
return x.max() - x.min()
result = df.groupby('Team')['Points'].apply(point_range).to_dict()
What is the value of result?
medium
A. {'A': 10, 'B': 10, 'C': 0}
B. {'A': 25, 'B': 30, 'C': 30}
C. {'A': 5, 'B': 10, 'C': 0}
D. {'A': 15, 'B': 20, 'C': 30}
Solution
Step 1: Group points by 'Team'
Teams: A has points [10, 15], B has [10, 20], C has [30].
Step 2: Calculate range (max - min) for each group
Range = max - min per group = {'A': 5, 'B': 10, 'C': 0} [OK]
Hint: Calculate max-min per group for range [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing sum with range
Forgetting single value group range is zero
Mixing keys and values in result
4. Consider this code snippet:
import pandas as pd
data = {'Category': ['X', 'X', 'Y'], 'Value': [1, 2, 3]}
df = pd.DataFrame(data)
# Custom function to sum values
def sum_values(x):
return x.sum
result = df.groupby('Category')['Value'].apply(sum_values)
What is the issue with this code?
medium
A. The apply method cannot be used with custom functions.
B. The groupby syntax is incorrect; it should be groupby(['Category']).
C. The DataFrame is missing a required index column.
D. The function sum_values returns the method, not the sum result.
Solution
Step 1: Check the custom function definition
The function returns x.sum which is a method, not called (missing parentheses).
Step 2: Understand the effect on apply
Returning the method itself causes the result to be a method object, not the sum value.
Final Answer:
The function sum_values returns the method, not the sum result. -> Option D
Quick Check:
Missing () calls method, not result [OK]
Hint: Call sum() with parentheses to get result [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Forgetting parentheses on sum()
Thinking groupby syntax is wrong here
Believing apply can't use custom functions
5. You have a DataFrame df with columns 'Store', 'Product', and 'Sales'. You want to find the difference between the highest and lowest sales per store, but only for products with sales above 100. Which approach correctly uses groupby with a custom function to achieve this?
hard
A. df.groupby('Store')['Sales'].apply(lambda x: x[x > 100].max() - x[x > 100].min())
B. All of the above produce the same correct result.
C. df.groupby('Store').apply(lambda g: g[g['Sales'] > 100]['Sales'].max() - g[g['Sales'] > 100]['Sales'].min())
D. df[df['Sales'] > 100].groupby('Store')['Sales'].apply(lambda x: x.max() - x.min())
Solution
Step 1: Understand filtering sales above 100
One approach filters inside the apply lambda on each store's sales series. Another filters the DataFrame before grouping. The third filters inside the group apply on the subgroup DataFrame.
Step 2: Check if all approaches calculate max-min correctly
All three methods correctly compute the difference of max and min sales above 100 per store.
Step 3: Confirm equivalence of results
Filtering before or inside groupby leads to the same final result for this case.
Final Answer:
All of the above produce the same correct result. -> Option B
Quick Check:
Filtering + groupby + custom function = all correct [OK]
Hint: Filter before or inside groupby; both work [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Filtering after groupby without apply
Not filtering sales > 100 properly
Assuming only one method works
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.