This finds the average of each column: [2.0, 3.0].
NumPy
np.mean(arr, axis=0)
This finds the max value in each row: [2, 4].
NumPy
np.max(arr, axis=1)
Sample Program
This program shows how to sum scores for each test across all students and find each student's average score.
NumPy
import numpy as np
# Create a 3x4 array representing 3 students and 4 test scores
scores = np.array([
[80, 90, 70, 85],
[75, 85, 80, 90],
[90, 95, 85, 100]
])
# Sum scores for each test (column-wise sum)
total_per_test = np.sum(scores, axis=0)
# Average score for each student (row-wise mean)
avg_per_student = np.mean(scores, axis=1)
print("Total scores per test:", total_per_test)
print("Average score per student:", avg_per_student)
OutputSuccess
Important Notes
Remember axis=0 collapses rows and keeps columns.
Axis numbering starts at 0 for the first dimension.
Aggregation functions include sum, mean, max, min, etc.
Summary
Aggregation combines data to summarize it.
Use axis=0 to aggregate down rows (per column).
Use axis=1 to aggregate across columns (per row).
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does setting axis=0 do when aggregating a 2D NumPy array?
easy
A. Aggregates values down each column (per column)
B. Aggregates values across each row (per row)
C. Flattens the array before aggregation
D. Aggregates only the diagonal elements
Solution
Step 1: Understand axis parameter meaning
In NumPy, axis=0 means aggregation happens down the rows, combining values in each column.
Step 2: Apply to 2D array
Aggregating with axis=0 summarizes each column separately.
Final Answer:
Aggregates values down each column (per column) -> Option A
Quick Check:
axis=0 means down rows = per column aggregation [OK]
Thinking axis=0 aggregates rows instead of columns
Assuming axis=0 flattens the array
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to sum a 2D NumPy array arr along rows (per row)?
easy
A. np.sum(arr, axis=1)
B. np.sum(arr, axis=0)
C. arr.sum(axis=2)
D. np.sum(arr)
Solution
Step 1: Identify axis for row-wise sum
Summing across columns (per row) requires axis=1.
Step 2: Check syntax correctness
np.sum(arr, axis=1) correctly sums each row's elements.
Final Answer:
np.sum(arr, axis=1) -> Option A
Quick Check:
Sum per row uses axis=1 [OK]
Hint: Use axis=1 to sum across columns (per row) [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using axis=0 to sum rows
Using invalid axis like 2 for 2D array
Forgetting to specify axis
3. Given the array:
arr = np.array([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]])
What is the output of np.sum(arr, axis=0)?
medium
A. [3 7 11]
B. [5 7 9]
C. [6 15]
D. [1 2 3 4 5 6]
Solution
Step 1: Understand axis=0 sum
Sum down rows means add elements in each column: (1+4), (2+5), (3+6).
Step 2: Calculate sums
Calculations: 1+4=5, 2+5=7, 3+6=9, so result is [5 7 9].
Final Answer:
[5 7 9] -> Option B
Quick Check:
Sum axis=0 adds columns down rows [OK]
Hint: Sum axis=0 adds columns down rows [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Adding rows instead of columns
Confusing axis=0 with axis=1
Returning flattened array instead of summed
4. What is wrong with this code snippet?
arr = np.array([[1, 2], [3, 4]])
result = np.mean(arr, axis=2)
medium
A. No error, code runs fine
B. np.mean cannot be used on arrays
C. Missing parentheses in np.array
D. axis=2 is invalid for 2D array
Solution
Step 1: Check array dimensions
The array arr is 2D with shape (2,2), so valid axes are 0 and 1.
Step 2: Validate axis parameter
Using axis=2 is invalid and causes an error because axis 2 does not exist.
Final Answer:
axis=2 is invalid for 2D array -> Option D
Quick Check:
Axis must be less than array dimensions [OK]
Hint: Axis must be less than array dimensions [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using axis number too large for array
Thinking np.mean can't be used on arrays
Ignoring error messages
5. You have a 3D NumPy array data with shape (4, 3, 2). You want to compute the sum of each 2D slice along the first axis (axis=0), resulting in a 2D array. Which code correctly does this?
hard
A. np.sum(data)
B. np.sum(data, axis=1)
C. np.sum(data, axis=0)
D. np.sum(data, axis=2)
Solution
Step 1: Understand array shape and axis
Array shape is (4,3,2). Summing along axis=0 collapses the first dimension (4), resulting in shape (3,2).
Step 2: Apply sum along axis=0
Using np.sum(data, axis=0) sums all 4 slices element-wise, producing a 2D array.
Final Answer:
np.sum(data, axis=0) -> Option C
Quick Check:
Sum axis=0 collapses first dimension to 2D [OK]
Hint: Sum axis=0 collapses first dimension in 3D arrays [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using wrong axis and getting wrong shape
Summing all elements without axis
Confusing axis numbering in 3D arrays
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.