Model Pipeline - Long document summarization strategies
This pipeline shows how a long document is summarized by breaking it down, processing parts, and combining results to create a short summary.
This pipeline shows how a long document is summarized by breaking it down, processing parts, and combining results to create a short summary.
Loss
2.5 |****
2.0 |***
1.5 |**
1.0 |*
0.5 |
+------------
1 2 3 4 5 Epochs| Epoch | Loss ↓ | Accuracy ↑ | Observation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.3 | 0.45 | Model starts learning basic summarization patterns. |
| 2 | 1.8 | 0.6 | Loss decreases, accuracy improves as model learns better context. |
| 3 | 1.4 | 0.72 | Model captures important sentences more accurately. |
| 4 | 1.1 | 0.8 | Summary quality improves, loss steadily decreases. |
| 5 | 0.9 | 0.85 | Model converges with good balance of loss and accuracy. |
chunks = split_document(document, size=500)
summaries = []
for chunk in chunks:
summary = model.summarize(chunk)
summaries.append(summary)
final_summary = model.summarize(' '.join(summaries))
print(final_summary)
What is the main purpose of the last line model.summarize(' '.join(summaries))?def summarize_long_doc(doc):
chunks = doc.split('.')
summaries = []
for chunk in chunks:
summary = model.summarize(chunk)
summaries.append(summary)
return ' '.join(summaries)
final_summary = summarize_long_doc(long_text)
print(final_summary)
What is the main issue with this approach?Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown