Which of the following is a primary benefit of denormalization in MongoDB?
Think about how denormalization affects data retrieval speed.
Denormalization stores related data together, reducing the need for joins and improving read speed. However, it can increase data duplication and complicate consistency.
Given a MongoDB collection orders where each document embeds customer info, what will this query return?
db.orders.find({"customer.name": "Alice"})db.orders.find({"customer.name": "Alice"})Remember how embedded documents are queried in MongoDB.
MongoDB allows querying inside embedded documents using dot notation. This query returns orders where the embedded customer name is 'Alice'.
You have denormalized customer address data embedded in many order documents. Which approach best minimizes update complexity when a customer changes address?
Consider how references affect update operations.
Storing address in a separate collection and referencing it avoids multiple updates. Denormalization improves reads but complicates writes when data is duplicated.
Consider this scenario: customer phone numbers are embedded in orders. After updating a customer's phone number in the customers collection, some orders still show the old number. What is the cause?
Think about how denormalization affects data duplication and consistency.
Denormalization duplicates data. Updating the original source does not automatically update embedded copies, causing stale data in orders.
Which statement best describes a key trade-off when choosing denormalization over normalization in MongoDB?
Consider how denormalization affects reads, writes, and data duplication.
Denormalization speeds up reads by embedding data but requires careful handling of writes and consistency due to duplicated data.