Bird
Raised Fist0
MLOpsdevops~10 mins

Technical debt in ML systems in MLOps - Interactive Code Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available

Start learning this pattern below

Jump into concepts and practice - no test required

or
Recommended
Test this pattern10 questions across easy, medium, and hard to know if this pattern is strong
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to identify the main cause of technical debt in ML systems.

MLOps
technical_debt_cause = '[1]'
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Afast_deployment
Bmodel_complexity
Csimple_code
Dcomplex_data_dependencies
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Choosing simple_code or fast_deployment as the cause.
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to show a common symptom of technical debt in ML systems.

MLOps
symptom = '[1]'
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Ahidden_feedback_loops
Bsimple_testing
Cclear_documentation
Dslow_model_training
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Choosing slow_model_training or clear_documentation.
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the code that causes technical debt by selecting the right practice.

MLOps
def deploy_model():
    # Avoid [1] to reduce technical debt
    pass
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Amanual_deployment
Bautomated_testing
Ccontinuous_integration
Dcode_review
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Choosing automated_testing or continuous_integration.
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to create a dictionary comprehension that tracks model versions and their status.

MLOps
model_status = {version[1]: status for version, status in versions.items() if status [2] 'deployed'}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
A.upper()
B==
C!=
D.lower()
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using != instead of == for filtering.
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to create a dictionary comprehension that maps feature names to their importance scores, filtering only positive scores.

MLOps
feature_importance = { [1]: [2] for [1], [2] in features.items() if [2] [3] 0 }
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Afeature
Bimportance
C>
Dscore
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using inconsistent variable names or wrong comparison operator.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What does technical debt in ML systems usually mean?
easy
A. Extra documentation for ML models
B. Using the latest ML algorithms
C. Quick fixes that cause problems later
D. Adding more hardware resources

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the meaning of technical debt

    Technical debt refers to shortcuts or quick fixes made during development that cause issues later.
  2. Step 2: Relate to ML systems context

    In ML systems, this means messy code, missing tests, or poor design that slows future work.
  3. Final Answer:

    Quick fixes that cause problems later -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Technical debt = Quick fixes causing future problems [OK]
Hint: Technical debt means quick fixes causing future issues [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing technical debt with adding features
  • Thinking it means more hardware
  • Assuming it is about documentation only
2. Which of the following is a sign of technical debt in ML code?
easy
A. Messy code with no tests
B. Well-documented and tested code
C. Using version control properly
D. Automated deployment pipelines

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify characteristics of technical debt

    Technical debt often shows as messy code and missing tests.
  2. Step 2: Match options to these characteristics

    Messy code with no tests describes messy code with no tests, which is a clear sign of technical debt.
  3. Final Answer:

    Messy code with no tests -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Messy code + no tests = Technical debt [OK]
Hint: Look for messy code and missing tests as debt signs [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Choosing well-documented code as debt
  • Confusing deployment pipelines with debt
  • Thinking version control causes debt
3. Consider this ML pipeline code snippet:
def train_model(data):
    model = Model()
    model.train(data)
    return model

model1 = train_model(data1)
model2 = train_model(data2)

# Later code uses model1 and model2

What technical debt risk does this code have?
medium
A. Model objects are not saved for reuse
B. Duplicate training code causing maintenance issues
C. No risk, code is clean and reusable
D. Data is not validated before training

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze the code behavior

    The function trains models but does not save them to disk or persistent storage.
  2. Step 2: Identify technical debt risk

    Not saving models means retraining is needed every time, causing inefficiency and maintenance problems.
  3. Final Answer:

    Model objects are not saved for reuse -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Models not saved = Technical debt risk [OK]
Hint: Check if models are saved to avoid retraining debt [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming code is clean without checking persistence
  • Ignoring data validation as debt here
  • Confusing duplicate code with saving models
4. You find this error in your ML system logs:
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'predict'

Which technical debt issue is most likely causing this?
medium
A. Deployment pipeline is missing environment variables
B. Data preprocessing step failed silently
C. Training function has a syntax error
D. Model object was not properly saved or loaded

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the error message

    The error means the model variable is None, so it was not loaded or saved correctly.
  2. Step 2: Link error to technical debt

    Not saving/loading models properly is a common technical debt causing runtime failures.
  3. Final Answer:

    Model object was not properly saved or loaded -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    None model = save/load issue = Technical debt [OK]
Hint: None model means save/load problem causing debt [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Blaming syntax errors for runtime NoneType errors
  • Assuming data preprocessing caused this error
  • Ignoring model persistence issues
5. You want to reduce technical debt in your ML system. Which approach best helps improve reliability and speed of updates?
hard
A. Train models faster by skipping data validation
B. Add automated tests and version control for models and code
C. Use complex code shortcuts to save development time
D. Avoid documentation to focus on coding

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify best practices to reduce technical debt

    Automated tests and version control improve code quality and track changes, reducing debt.
  2. Step 2: Evaluate options for reliability and update speed

    Add automated tests and version control for models and code supports reliability and faster updates by preventing errors and managing versions.
  3. Final Answer:

    Add automated tests and version control for models and code -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Tests + version control = Less technical debt [OK]
Hint: Tests and version control reduce technical debt fast [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Skipping validation to save time increases debt
  • Using shortcuts adds more debt
  • Ignoring documentation harms maintainability