Architecture decision records (ADR) in Microservices - Architecture Diagram

System Overview - Architecture decision records (ADR)

This system manages Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) for a microservices environment. It helps teams document, store, and retrieve architectural decisions to ensure clarity and consistency across services. Key requirements include easy access, version control, and integration with development workflows.

Architecture Diagram

User
  |
  v
Load Balancer
  |
  v
API Gateway
  |
  v
+------------------+      +----------------+
| ADR Management    |<---->| Version Control|
| Service           |      | Service        |
+------------------+      +----------------+
        |
        v
+------------------+
| Database         |
+------------------+

Components

User

client

Developer or architect accessing ADR system

Load Balancer

load_balancer

Distributes incoming requests evenly to API Gateway instances

API Gateway

api_gateway

Routes requests to ADR Management Service and handles authentication

ADR Management Service

service

Handles creation, retrieval, update, and deletion of ADRs

Version Control Service

service

Manages versioning and history of ADR documents

Database

database

Stores ADR metadata and content

Request Flow - 8 Hops

User → Load Balancer

Load Balancer → API Gateway

API Gateway → ADR Management Service

ADR Management Service → Version Control Service

ADR Management Service → Database

ADR Management Service → API Gateway

API Gateway → Load Balancer

Load Balancer → User

Failure Scenario

Component Fails:Database

Impact:ADR content cannot be read or saved; version history may be incomplete

Mitigation:Use database replication and failover to maintain availability; cache recent ADRs for read access

Architecture Quiz - 3 Questions

Which component handles authentication before routing requests to the ADR service?

A API Gateway

B Load Balancer

C Version Control Service

D Database

Design Principle

This architecture uses a layered approach with a load balancer and API gateway to manage traffic and security. Separating version control from ADR management allows focused handling of document history. Database replication and caching improve reliability and performance.

Practice

1. What is the main purpose of an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) in microservices projects?

easy

A. To document important architecture decisions and their reasons

B. To write detailed code for each microservice

C. To track bugs and issues in the system

D. To monitor server performance metrics

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the role of ADRs

   ADRs are used to record key architecture decisions and why they were made.

2. Step 2: Differentiate ADRs from other documents

   ADRs are not for code, bugs, or performance monitoring but for decision documentation.

3. Final Answer:

   To document important architecture decisions and their reasons -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Purpose of ADR = Document decisions [OK]

Hint: ADRs capture decisions, not code or bugs [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing ADRs with bug tracking
• Thinking ADRs are code documentation
• Assuming ADRs monitor system metrics

2. Which of the following is the correct basic structure of an ADR document?

easy

A. Title, Status, Context, Decision, Consequences

B. Title, Code, Tests, Deployment, Logs

C. Summary, Bugs, Fixes, Performance, Metrics

D. Introduction, User Stories, UI Design, API Endpoints

Solution

1. Step 1: Recall ADR standard sections

   ADRs typically include Title, Status, Context, Decision, and Consequences.

2. Step 2: Eliminate unrelated structures

   Options with code, bugs, or UI design are unrelated to ADR format.

3. Final Answer:

   Title, Status, Context, Decision, Consequences -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   ADR structure = Title, Status, Context, Decision, Consequences [OK]

Hint: Look for Context and Consequences in ADR structure [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Mixing ADR with test or deployment docs
• Confusing ADR with bug reports
• Including UI design in ADR

3. Given this ADR excerpt:

Title: Use REST for service communication
Status: Accepted
Context: Need simple, stateless communication
Decision: Use REST over HTTP
Consequences: Easier integration but higher latency

What is the main consequence documented here?

medium

A. REST requires stateful connections for speed

B. REST causes stateless communication to fail

C. REST reduces integration complexity and latency

D. REST leads to easier integration but higher latency

Solution

1. Step 1: Read the Consequences section carefully

   The consequence states "Easier integration but higher latency".

2. Step 2: Match the consequence with options

   REST leads to easier integration but higher latency matches exactly; others contradict the text.

3. Final Answer:

   REST leads to easier integration but higher latency -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Consequence = Easier integration, higher latency [OK]

Hint: Focus on Consequences section for effects [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Ignoring the 'higher latency' part
• Assuming REST reduces latency
• Confusing stateless with stateful

4. You find an ADR with this status:

Status: Deprecated

What does this status indicate about the decision?

medium

A. The decision is newly proposed and under review

B. The decision is no longer recommended or used

C. The decision is currently active and enforced

D. The decision has been accepted but not implemented yet

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand ADR status meanings

   "Deprecated" means the decision is outdated and should not be used.

2. Step 2: Compare with other statuses

   New proposals are "Proposed", active ones "Accepted", so deprecated means no longer recommended.

3. Final Answer:

   The decision is no longer recommended or used -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Status 'Deprecated' = Not recommended [OK]

Hint: Deprecated means outdated, avoid using [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing deprecated with accepted
• Thinking deprecated means new proposal
• Assuming deprecated means pending

5. Your team must decide between using REST or gRPC for microservice communication. You want to document this choice clearly for future reference. Which is the best way to use an ADR in this situation?

hard

A. Write code samples for both REST and gRPC without explanation

B. Skip documentation and decide by majority vote only

C. Write an ADR with Context explaining needs, Decision stating REST or gRPC, and Consequences of each choice

D. Create a bug report to track this decision

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify ADR purpose for decision documentation

   ADRs should explain context, decision, and consequences clearly.

2. Step 2: Evaluate options for documenting architecture choices

   Only Write an ADR with Context explaining needs, Decision stating REST or gRPC, and Consequences of each choice uses ADR properly; others ignore documentation or misuse formats.

3. Final Answer:

   Write an ADR with Context explaining needs, Decision stating REST or gRPC, and Consequences of each choice -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Use ADR to document decision and consequences [OK]

Hint: Use ADR to record context, decision, and consequences [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Skipping documentation
• Confusing ADR with bug reports
• Only writing code without explanation