In a microservices architecture, why should each service own its own data?
Think about how tightly connected services become if they share data storage.
Owning data per service ensures loose coupling, which means services can evolve independently without breaking others. Sharing databases tightly couples services and creates dependencies.
Given a microservices system with User, Order, and Inventory services, which service should own the data about product stock levels?
Consider which service is responsible for managing stock details.
The Inventory service owns product stock data because it is responsible for managing and updating stock levels. Other services should query it via APIs rather than owning the data.
What is a major scaling challenge when multiple microservices share a single database for their data?
Think about what happens when many services depend on the same database under load.
Sharing a database creates a single point of contention and coupling, which limits the ability to scale services independently and can cause cascading failures.
What is a key tradeoff when a microservice duplicates data owned by another service to reduce cross-service calls?
Consider what happens when the same data exists in multiple places.
Duplicating data can reduce latency by avoiding remote calls but requires mechanisms to keep data synchronized, increasing complexity and risking stale data.
In a microservices system where each service owns its data, how does this design affect overall system reliability compared to a shared database approach?
Think about how failure in one service affects others when data is owned separately.
Owning data per service isolates failures to that service and its database, preventing cascading failures and improving overall system reliability.