Bird
Raised Fist0
Microservicessystem_design~10 mins

Request-response vs event-driven in Microservices - Interactive Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available

Start learning this pattern below

Jump into concepts and practice - no test required

or
Recommended
Test this pattern10 questions across easy, medium, and hard to know if this pattern is strong
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to show a request-response call between two microservices.

Microservices
response = serviceB.[1](request_data)
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Asend_event
Bemit_signal
Cpublish_message
Dcall_api
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Choosing event-driven terms like 'send_event' instead of direct call.
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to publish an event in an event-driven microservice.

Microservices
event_bus.[1](event_data)
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Arequest_response
Bpublish_event
Ccall_api
Dsend_request
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using synchronous call terms like 'call_api' in event-driven context.
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the event-driven consumer code to properly handle incoming events.

Microservices
def on_event_received(event):
    [1](event.data)

# Missing function to process event data
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aemit_signal
Bcall_api
Cprocess_event
Dsend_event
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using sending functions instead of processing functions.
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to complete the request-response flow: client sends request and waits for response.

Microservices
response = client.[1](request)
if response.[2] == 200:
    handle_success(response.data)
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Asend_request
Bstatus_code
Cevent_type
Dpublish_event
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using event-driven terms in request-response code.
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to complete the event-driven consumer that subscribes, processes, and acknowledges events.

Microservices
event_bus.[1]('order_created', on_order)

def on_order(event):
    [2](event.data)
    event.[3]()
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Asubscribe
Bprocess_order
Cacknowledge
Dpublish
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using 'publish' instead of 'subscribe' or 'acknowledge'.

Practice

(1/5)
1. Which communication pattern is best when a service needs an immediate answer from another service?
easy
A. Event-driven pattern
B. Request-response pattern
C. Batch processing
D. File transfer

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand request-response pattern

    This pattern involves one service sending a request and waiting for a direct reply from another service immediately.
  2. Step 2: Compare with event-driven pattern

    Event-driven is asynchronous and does not guarantee immediate response, so it is not suitable for immediate answers.
  3. Final Answer:

    Request-response pattern -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Immediate answer = Request-response [OK]
Hint: Immediate reply means request-response pattern [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing event-driven with immediate response
  • Thinking batch processing is real-time
  • Assuming file transfer is a communication pattern
2. Which of the following is the correct way to describe an event-driven system?
easy
A. Services emit events and other services react asynchronously.
B. Services send requests and wait for replies synchronously.
C. Services communicate only through shared databases.
D. Services batch process data at fixed intervals.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Define event-driven communication

    In event-driven systems, services emit events without waiting for immediate replies, and other services react to these events asynchronously.
  2. Step 2: Eliminate incorrect options

    Services send requests and wait for replies synchronously. describes request-response, C and D are unrelated to event-driven communication.
  3. Final Answer:

    Services emit events and other services react asynchronously. -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Event-driven = asynchronous event emission [OK]
Hint: Event-driven means emit events, react later [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Mixing synchronous request-response with event-driven
  • Thinking event-driven requires waiting for replies
  • Confusing batch processing with event-driven
3. Consider this scenario: Service A sends a request to Service B and waits for a response. Meanwhile, Service C emits an event that Service B listens to and processes asynchronously. Which pattern does Service A use with Service B, and which pattern does Service C use with Service B?
medium
A. Service A uses request-response; Service C uses event-driven
B. Both use event-driven
C. Both use request-response
D. Service A uses event-driven; Service C uses request-response

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify Service A and B interaction

    Service A sends a request and waits for a response from Service B, which is the request-response pattern.
  2. Step 2: Identify Service C and B interaction

    Service C emits an event that Service B processes asynchronously, which is event-driven communication.
  3. Final Answer:

    Service A uses request-response; Service C uses event-driven -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Request-response = direct wait; Event-driven = async event [OK]
Hint: Request-response waits; event-driven emits and forgets [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Swapping patterns between services
  • Assuming all communication is synchronous
  • Ignoring asynchronous event processing
4. A developer implemented a microservice system where Service X sends an event and immediately expects a response from Service Y. What is the main issue with this design?
medium
A. Events must be stored in a database before processing.
B. Request-response pattern is not suitable for microservices.
C. Services should never communicate directly.
D. Event-driven systems do not support immediate responses; this breaks the pattern.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand event-driven communication

    Event-driven systems are asynchronous; services emit events without waiting for immediate replies.
  2. Step 2: Identify the design issue

    Expecting an immediate response after sending an event contradicts the asynchronous nature of event-driven systems, causing design problems.
  3. Final Answer:

    Event-driven systems do not support immediate responses; this breaks the pattern. -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Event-driven ≠ immediate response [OK]
Hint: Events don't get immediate replies in event-driven [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking request-response is bad for microservices
  • Believing services must never communicate directly
  • Confusing event storage with communication pattern
5. You are designing a large e-commerce system. For order placement, the user must get immediate confirmation. For inventory updates and shipping notifications, delays are acceptable. Which combination of communication patterns should you use?
hard
A. Use event-driven for order confirmation; request-response for inventory and shipping
B. Use request-response for all communications
C. Use request-response for order confirmation; event-driven for inventory and shipping
D. Use event-driven for all communications

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze order confirmation requirement

    User needs immediate confirmation, so request-response pattern fits best for order placement.
  2. Step 2: Analyze inventory and shipping updates

    These can be delayed and processed asynchronously, so event-driven pattern suits these tasks.
  3. Step 3: Combine patterns appropriately

    Use request-response for immediate feedback and event-driven for asynchronous updates to scale well and keep user experience smooth.
  4. Final Answer:

    Use request-response for order confirmation; event-driven for inventory and shipping -> Option C
  5. Quick Check:

    Immediate = request-response; delayed = event-driven [OK]
Hint: Immediate needs request-response; delays use event-driven [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using event-driven for immediate confirmation
  • Using request-response for all async tasks
  • Ignoring user experience needs